Wikipedia talk:Net positive

Essays Low‑impact

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.EssaysWikipedia:WikiProject EssaysTemplate:WikiProject EssaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
Low	This page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
	The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Expand?[edit]

Could this be expanded to include other areas where we can achieve a "net positive"? Such as items at XfD discussions, consensus !votes, etc. where the sum of the parts are greater than the whole? I've seen many areas where I've been tempted to say - "It would be a "net positive" if we kept/agreed/deleted/changed something. Or is is best to keep as related to RfA? Just a thought. — Ched : ? 17:35, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the scope of this should be expanded. In particular, the concept of "net positive" could be used to explain WP:IAR. WFCforLife (talk) 20:03, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

History[edit]

I have merged the history with an older version of this important essay, so it's all in one place now. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:47, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]