This page is within the scope of , a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of WikiProject Essays Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.
Low This page has been rated as
Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
126.96.36.199 makes an excellent example on this wiki of an excellent IP editor. I mean, he even got an RFA. Perhaps he can be added to this essay. nneonneo 05:46, 14 April 2008 (UTC) talk
be bold and add it? It may be my creation but it is not my article. Thanks for the point, and I will add it. 20:41, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. I wasn't sure how best to word it, so I thought it best to leave it to you.
nneonneo 20:54, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Don't worry about it! Thanks for pointing it out!
21:47, 25 April 2008 (UTC) weburiedoursecrets inthegarden I just took a gander at the edit history of
188.8.131.52. It's refreshing to see an IP using edit summaries. Eeekster ( talk) 04:13, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
And of course the corrolary... [ edit ]
that not every vandal is an IP.
Miquonranger03 ( talk) 22:34, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
That is a fallacy. nneonneo 02:33, 7 September 2008 (UTC) talk
Shortcut [ edit ]
This needs a shortcut
184.108.40.206 ( talk) 12:46, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
is a shortcut. 220.127.116.11 ( talk) 22:07, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Established users posing as unregistered IP addresses [ edit ]
Some WP users (and others) may correct typos etc without signing in.
The editor may be operating from work/elsewhere and not wish others there to know their WP identity.
Requesting clarification on "seemingly silly questions"/minor topics tangental to the editor's main areas (eg fanfic or "certain obscure practices")