Wikipedia talk:Categorizing portals

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Categorizing portals page.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Portals, a collaborative effort to improve portals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortalsWikipedia:WikiProject PortalsTemplate:WikiProject PortalsPortals articles
Project	This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
	See also: List of Portals

History[edit]

I recategorized some of the portals to match what seemed to be the generally adopted approach. In order to have a consistent approach to categorizing portals, I thought it would be helpful to document that approach. Please feel free to comment on these guidelines or propose changes.

For portal subcategories, only the main portal(s) from the subcategory should be included in the Portals category. The remainder of the portals in the subcategories should only be included in the subcategory. As additional portal subcategories are created, portals that are included in the subcategories should be recategorized according to these guidelines. These guidelines apply recursively to subsubcategories and their parent subcategories.

—Doug Bell ^{talk•contrib} 09:13, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the entire spiel (some things changed in the intervening 3.5+ years, and some topics were not originally covered at all). — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 10:44, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now moved everything to Wikipedia:Portal/Categorizing. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 11:10, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization of portal categories[edit]

I propose adding a note to Wikipedia:Portal/Categorizing#Proper_categorization saying that portal categories should not be categorized in content categories (categories under Category:Articles). The reasons for this are:

Currently some portal categories are (directly) in a content category (example) and some (example) are not (an inconsistency).
Currently some content categories contain just a portal and some contain both a portal and a portal category (e.g. Category:Religion directly contains Portal:Religion and Category:Religion portals (as well as an icon)). This is an inconsistency and adds to the clutter in content categories.
Portal categories often contain administration pages (example) and things like templates (example). The principle we normally follow is that such pages shouldn't be under content categories.
Every portal page (e.g. Portal:Foo) should be (directly) in the corresponding content category (Category:Foo). It's not possible to fully check this using category intersection whilst some portal categories are in content categories (although there's also another reason why that doesn't currently work).DexDor^(talk) 22:21, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DexDor (talk) 08:38, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've made the proposed change. DexDor (talk) 20:54, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]