Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/July 24

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
Q1: Why is [Insert event here], an event that is "more important and significant" than all the others that are currently listed, not posted?
A1: Relative article quality along with the mix of topics already listed are often deciding factors in what gets posted. Any given day of the year can have a great many important or significant historical events. The problem is that there is generally only room on the Main Page to list about 5 events at a time, so not everything can be posted.
As stated on Wikipedia:FAQ/Main Page, the items and events posted on the Main Page are chosen based more on how well they are written, not based on how much important or significant their subjects are. It is easier for admins to select a well-written, cited, verifiable article over a poor one versus trying to determine objectively how much a subject is important or significant.
Keep in mind that the quality requirements only apply to the selected bolded article, not the other links. Thus, an event may qualify for multiple dates in a year if there is an article written in a summary style and an article providing detailed content; if one of those pages have cleanup issues, the other page can be bolded as an alternate.
Another criterion is to maintain some variety of topics, and not exhibit, just for example, tech-centrism, or the belief that the world stops at the edge of the English-speaking world. Many days have a large pool of potential articles, so they will rotate in and out every year to give each one some Main Page exposure. In addition, an event is not posted if it is also the subject of this year's scheduled featured article or featured picture.
Q2: There are way too many 20th-century events listed. Why aren't there more events from the 19th century and before?
A2: The short, basic reason is the systemic bias of Wikipedia. There are not enough good, well-written articles on 19th-century and earlier events for all 365 days in the year. Currently, a majority of users seem to be generally more interested in writing articles about recent events. If you would like to further help mitigate the systemic bias in Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias.
Q3: This page seems to be biased toward events based in [Insert country or region here]. What can be done about it?
A3: This again is attributed to the systemic bias of Wikipedia. Many users are generally more interested in working on good, well-written articles pertaining to their home country. Since this is the English Wikipedia, there will be more English-speaking users, and thus more articles pertaining to English-speaking countries. And if there are more users who are from the United States, there will probably be more well-written articles about events based in the United States. Again, if you would like to further help mitigate the systemic bias in Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias.
Q4: Why is the birthday of [Insert name here] not listed?
A4: Births and deaths can only be used on centennials, etc. Exceptions can be made if they are directly related to assassinations, executions, natural disasters, civil accidents, genocide/extinction, or other historically significant topics that frequently appear on the Selected Anniversaries pages.
Q5: Are the holidays/observances listed in any particular order?
A5: Yes, there is a specified order: International observances first, then alphabetically by where observed.
Q6: Some of the holidays/observances that are listed have dates in parentheses beside them. What do they mean?
A6: There are two reasons that some holidays/observances have dates next to them:
  • Non-Gregorian-based holidays/observances are marked with the current year as a reminder to others that their dates do in fact vary from year to year.
  • National Days, Independence Days, and other holidays celebrating the nationhood of a country are generally marked by the year of the significant historic date being observed.
Today's featured article for July 24, 2018 Today's featured picture for July 24, 2018
Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 24, 2018



Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/July 23 * Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/July 25

Suggested correction[edit]

The text:

...makes it sound like Brigham Young led the Mormon pioneers to Salt Lake Valley, then led them into Mexico. It might read better as:

I can't edit this source, but someone with more power ought to.  :)
ZorkFox (Talk) 00:52, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Fixed. Thanks for pointing this out. You may want to try WP:ERRORS the next time you find minor errors like that on MainPage. You'll get better service there. -- PFHLai 13:15, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Lost City of the Incas[edit]

Moved from Talk:Main Page.

The "Lost City of the Incas" usually refers to Vilcabamba, not Macchu Picchu --Descendall 23:48, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

"then thought to be the ..." would be most accurate. The name is associated with its history. --Dhartung | Talk 00:29, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Siege of Damascus[edit]

According to the article, the Siege of Damascus started on July 23, 1148. This date is also listed in A History of the Crusades (p 508) --Andibrunt (talk) 07:55, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

2012 notes[edit]

All articles making their OTD debuts! howcheng {chat} 05:57, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

It was a mistake to include noncited assertion from Albanian Revolt of 1910 into this page, especially because it was explained on the talk page that this article has serious issues. One of the issues was that the text of could mislead potential readers that rebels managed to capture many towns including Shkoder, though the last section mentions that rebels did not manage to capture cities but only mountainous regions. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 14:10, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
The article does not have any maintenance tags on it. The "fact" is what's listed on the July 24 article. howcheng {chat} 17:21, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
According to the Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries: The date must be a cited to a reliable source with an inline citation, since inline citations are used to support specific statements in an article. In this case the assertion from Albanian Revolt of 1910 is not cited. It even does not exist in the text of the article.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 22:34, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
"On July 24, 1910, Ottoman forces entered the city of Scutari. During this period martial courts were put in action and summary executions took place. A large number of firearms were collected and many villages and properties were burned by the Ottoman army.[8]" I admit that I did not verify it against the source, however. Actually I just tried right now and that page is not included in the Google Books preview, so that would not have been possible anyway. howcheng {chat} 02:52, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
The assertion you added to Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries is not sourced. The source you mention is used to support another assertion, the claim about villages burned by the Ottoman army. But even if the text you presented is supported by the same source (which is not), it is about the Ottoman reinforcement which managed to break trough the mountains under control of the rebels and enter Scutari to reinforce its Ottoman garrison. Then they went to villages on the mauntains and did what they did (burning houses and taking away arms from rebels). Point is that Ottoman forces did not capture the city of Shkodër because it was already under Ottoman control, not conquired by the rebels. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 06:21, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
OK, how would reword it? howcheng {chat} 09:00, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
I think that rewording would not resolve the problem with unsourced assertion about events that actually did not happen (Ottomans capturing Shkoder in 1910).--Antidiskriminator (talk) 15:04, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

2013 notes[edit]

howcheng {chat} 09:20, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

2014 notes[edit]

howcheng {chat} 06:56, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

2015 notes[edit]

howcheng {chat} 06:49, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

2016 notes[edit]

howcheng {chat} 06:58, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

2017 notes[edit]