Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/October 21

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
Q1: Why is [Insert event here], an event that is "more important and significant" than all the others that are currently listed, not posted?
A1: Relative article quality along with the mix of topics already listed are often deciding factors in what gets posted. Any given day of the year can have a great many important or significant historical events. The problem is that there is generally only room on the Main Page to list about 5 events at a time, so not everything can be posted.
As stated on Wikipedia:FAQ/Main Page, the items and events posted on the Main Page are chosen based more on how well they are written, not based on how much important or significant their subjects are. It is easier for admins to select a well-written, cited, verifiable article over a poor one versus trying to determine objectively how much a subject is important or significant.
Keep in mind that the quality requirements only apply to the selected bolded article, not the other links. Thus, an event may qualify for multiple dates in a year if there is an article written in a summary style and an article providing detailed content; if one of those pages have cleanup issues, the other page can be bolded as an alternate.
Another criterion is to maintain some variety of topics, and not exhibit, just for example, tech-centrism, or the belief that the world stops at the edge of the English-speaking world. Many days have a large pool of potential articles, so they will rotate in and out every year to give each one some Main Page exposure. In addition, an event is not posted if it is also the subject of this year's scheduled featured article or featured picture.
Q2: There are way too many 20th-century events listed. Why aren't there more events from the 19th century and before?
A2: The short, basic reason is the systemic bias of Wikipedia. There are not enough good, well-written articles on 19th-century and earlier events for all 365 days in the year. Currently, a majority of users seem to be generally more interested in writing articles about recent events. If you would like to further help mitigate the systemic bias in Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias.
Q3: This page seems to be biased toward events based in [Insert country or region here]. What can be done about it?
A3: This again is attributed to the systemic bias of Wikipedia. Many users are generally more interested in working on good, well-written articles pertaining to their home country. Since this is the English Wikipedia, there will be more English-speaking users, and thus more articles pertaining to English-speaking countries. And if there are more users who are from the United States, there will probably be more well-written articles about events based in the United States. Again, if you would like to further help mitigate the systemic bias in Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias.
Q4: Why is the birthday of [Insert name here] not listed?
A4: Births and deaths can only be used on centennials, etc. Exceptions can be made if they are directly related to assassinations, executions, natural disasters, civil accidents, genocide/extinction, or other historically significant topics that frequently appear on the Selected Anniversaries pages.
Q5: Are the holidays/observances listed in any particular order?
A5: Yes, there is a specified order: International observances first, then alphabetically by where observed. But this is a recent change (1 June 2011), so not every page has been updated to reflect this.
Q6: Some of the holidays/observances that are listed have dates in parentheses beside them. What do they mean?
A6: There are two reasons that some holidays/observances have dates next to them:
  • Non-Gregorian-based holidays/observances are marked with the current year as a reminder to others that their dates do in fact vary from year to year.
  • National Days, Independence Days, and other holidays celebrating the nationhood of a country are generally marked by the year of the significant historic date being observed.
Today's featured article for October 21, 2017 Today's featured picture for October 21, 2017
Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 21, 2017

viewtalkedit

None selected. See Wikipedia:Picture of the day/Guidelines for help.

create

Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/October 20 * Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/October 22


Hope some admin has this on the watch list ... Apparently Evita's and Juan Perron's marriage took plave on oct, 22, not 21 - see as the most reliable looking site I found on this <sheesh it's a blocked site> evita<dot>4mg<dot>com/CapI<dot>html (in Spanish, but search 22 de octubre de 1945 there). On German selected anniversaries I've chosen Megamouth Shark#6 instead see [1] for further information) cheers --de:Benutzer:Interpretix 01:03, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing this out. I wish I'd seen this earlier. The wedding is now off the list of selected anniversaries. I've copied your post on Talk:Eva Perón. I hope someone more familiar with the Peróns than me can get this clarified. Thanks. --PFHLai 17:36, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Trafalgar Day[edit]

The article isn't anything special, but how far away is Trafalgar Day from being well-written enough to be on here? Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 14:01, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

2012 notes[edit]

howcheng {chat} 04:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

2013 notes[edit]

howcheng {chat} 06:32, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

2014 notes[edit]

howcheng {chat} 10:29, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

2015 notes[edit]

howcheng {chat} 17:27, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Back to the Future Day 2015[edit]

FYI October 21st 2015 is getting some press coverage as Back to the Future Day, e.g. BBC (mostly taken from this Financial Times story, NBC, CNN, 63,934 likes on Facebook, etc. And there are special screenings all over the place, e.g. [2], [3], [4]. - Pointillist (talk) 17:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done. Will take it off for next year. howcheng {chat} 22:38, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

2016 request[edit]

@Howcheng: - the Aberfan disaster is listed as ineligible due to external links. I see no reason why this should be. Both ELs are relevant to the article and neither seems to be in breach of WP:ELNO. As this year is the 50th anniversary, can the article be featured with a photograph please? Mjroots (talk) 07:49, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

@Mjroots: This is what it looked like a year ago. Looks like someone did some pruning, so we are good to go. howcheng {chat} 16:46, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

2016 notes[edit]

howcheng {chat} 03:31, 21 October 2016 (UTC)