Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anthropology
- 1 Human height
- 2 Cro-Magnon
- 3 Latin peoples article deletion
- 4 AfC submission - 17/03
- 5 CfD discussion for societies and cultures
- 6 Mongoloid
- 7 Paleoanthropology and Michael Cremo
- 8 Matriarchy
- 9 Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kinship Terms: the Numerical Variations
- 10 RfC at Talk:Cro-Magnon
- 11 AfC submission - 26/05
- 12 AfC submission - 27/05
- 13 Leaflet for Wikiproject Anthropology at Wikimania 2014
- 14 One of your project's articles has been featured
- 15 CfD nomination of Category:People by ethnic or national descent by continent
- 16 CfD nomination of Category:People by ethnic or national origin
- 17 Requested move at talk:Neanderthal extinction hypotheses
- 18 Comment on the WikiProject X proposal
- 19 WikiProject Academia?
- 20 Launch of WikiProject Wikidata for research
- 21 Categories: why "Human biology" and "Human geography" are next to "Anthropology" under "Social sciences"?
- 22 WikiProject X is live!
- 23 Homo tsaichangensis - new article to keep an eye on
- 24 Male body shape article needed
- 25 RFC that may affect this project
- 26 History and founders of Anthropology
- 27 Presentations and pluralisations of peoples
- 28 "Man" infobox bias
- 29 AfC submission
- 30 Article on Avi Tuschman and Our Political Nature: The Evolutionary Origins of What Divides Us
- 31 ITN candidate Australopithecus deyiremeda
- 32 Acceleration (human)
- 33 RfC at Homo naledi
- 34 Article request
- 35 Genetic anthropology
- 36 Article upgrade assistance request (Pre-translation stage)
- 37 Semitic people merge discussion
- 38 Cradle of Humankind
- 39 Proposed article move from Syro-Palestinian archaeology to Levantine archaeology
- 40 Please visit and help
- 41 Nomination of List of films featuring whitewashed roles for deletion
- 42 One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
- 43 Proposed Merger of Cultural entomology and Ethnoentomology
- 44 User:The Ungovernable Force/Wikiproject Anthropology
- 45 Help expand an article?
- 46 Duplication in articles on consanguinity, incest, etc.
- 47 Trouble finding references? The Wikipedia Library is proud to announce ...
- 48 100% Shameless Canvassing
- 49 Chribaya
- 50 Need help with Cyber-ethnography article
- 51 RfC notice: image montages of individual faces on ethnicity and other demonym articles
- 52 RM on anti-national sentiment
- 53 Looking for feedback on a tool on Visual Editor to add open license text from other sources
- 54 Missing article: Native American nation
- 55 Navbox for prehistoric caves
- 56 Category move for discussion
- 57 Request for comments
- 58 One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hi there. Just seeking input at Talk:Human_height#Why_is_height_being_expressed_in_metres.3F. Cheers.--Gibson Flying V (talk) 02:15, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- And again at Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Dates_and_numbers#Human_height.--Gibson Flying V (talk) 23:57, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Cro-Magnon. Sourcing issues, conflation of the European pre-Neolithics population with Cro-Magnon, etc. Two new eidtors who mean well but it takes time to learn how we work. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 12:41, 23 February 2014 (UTC)needs attention. See recent posts at
Latin peoples article deletion
AfC submission - 17/03
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Langgai Tinggang. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 02:43, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
CfD discussion for societies and cultures
There is a discussion going on right now at WP:Categories for discussion that involves changing the category names for all cultures, from, for example, "Afghan society" to "Society of Afghanistan". I can see that next will be changing "German culture" to "Culture of Germany" and the like. This would be for all ethnicities, nationalities and cultures.
If you would like to weigh in, the conversation is occurring at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 March 27#Society by country. Liz Read! Talk! 14:50, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
I'll be surprised and pleased if anyone has any knowledge about this subject. I've run into an editor adding material from someone who thinks Mongoloids had the decimal system 50,000 years ago (he didn't add that, but he used the author to say that there were Mongoloids up to 70,000 KYA. Dougweller (talk) 19:59, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- I have some biological anthropology textbooks at hand. The view you mention is certainly not a mainstream view (and not supported by archeology, for sure). -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 16:33, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Paleoanthropology and Michael Cremo
An editor has added a pov tag to Paleoanthropology on the basis that mainstream archaeology is biased and that Michael Cremo must be included. I've removed it as a misunderstanding of NPOV and the purpose of the article but I expect him to put it back. See Talk:Paleoanthropology#''Controversy'' section Dougweller (talk) 17:44, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
This month and last month the lead was tag bombed. I've removed most but my removals are being disputed - anyone with time is invited to see comment at the discussion at Talk:Matriarchy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dougweller (talk • contribs) 12:50, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Dear anthropology experts: This old draft was never submitted at AfC to be added to the encyclopedia, and now it's stale and about to be deleted. I seem to remember from my undergraduate days that "kinship" is an aspect of anthropology, so I thought that I would check here to see if anyone thinks its a notable topic and should be kept and improved instead. —Anne Delong (talk) 14:26, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
RfC at Talk:Cro-Magnon
See Talk:Cro-Magnon#RFC: Should this article suggest an identity between Cro-Magnon and EEMH or say that CM is a subset of EEMH? - anyone interested in the subject of Cro-Magnon or early modern humans please at least take a look at the page. Dougweller (talk) 16:07, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
AfC submission - 26/05
AfC submission - 27/05
Leaflet for Wikiproject Anthropology at Wikimania 2014
My name is Adi Khajuria and I am helping out with Wikimania 2014 in London.
One of our initiatives is to create leaflets to increase the discoverability of various wikimedia projects, and showcase the breadth of activity within wikimedia. Any kind of project can have a physical paper leaflet designed - for free - as a tool to help recruit new contributors. These leaflets will be printed at Wikimania 2014, and the designs can be re-used in the future at other events and locations.
This is particularly aimed at highlighting less discoverable but successful projects, e.g:
• Active Wikiprojects: Wikiproject Medicine, WikiProject Video Games, Wikiproject Film
• Tech projects/Tools, which may be looking for either users or developers.
• Less known major projects: Wikinews, Wikidata, Wikivoyage, etc.
• Wiki Loves Parliaments, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiki Loves ____
• Wikimedia thematic organisations, Wikiwomen’s Collaborative, The Signpost
The deadline for submissions is 1st July 2014
For more information or to sign up for one for your project, go to:
Adikhajuria (talk) 09:47, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been featured
CfD nomination of Category:People by ethnic or national descent by continent
Category:People by ethnic or national descent by continent has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. 068129201223129O9598127 (talk) 21:12, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:People by ethnic or national origin
Category:People by ethnic or national origin has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. 068129201223129O9598127 (talk) 10:53, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Requested move at talk:Neanderthal extinction hypotheses
Comment on the WikiProject X proposal
Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Launch of WikiProject Wikidata for research
Hi, this is to let you know that we've launched WikiProject Wikidata for research in order to stimulate a closer interaction between Wikidata and research, both on a technical and a community level. As a first activity, we are drafting a research proposal on the matter (cf. blog post). Your thoughts on and contributions to that would be most welcome! Thanks, -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 02:16, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Categories: why "Human biology" and "Human geography" are next to "Anthropology" under "Social sciences"?
Maybe I misunderstand what anthropology is about, but is this correct way of categorization:
- I dont think any of those categorizations work. I dont think many people consider human biology to be a social science. And Human genetics is definitely not a subfield of biological anthropology. Human geography is an inter sectional field between anthropology and geography so it could go under either - but probably makes more sense under geography.User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 15:24, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
WikiProject X is live!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Homo tsaichangensis - new article to keep an eye on
Homo tsaichangensis, more widely known as Penghu 1, an apparently new species of Homo, described and named (apparently concurrently but by different authors) in the last few days. --Animalparty-- (talk) 07:58, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- As far as I can see there is very little reason that jaw couldn't fit within Asian Homo erectus. It is ridiculous how quick people are to name any tiny fossil a new species without any substantial anatomical evidence for doing so. thanks for bringing the article to our attention.User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 00:31, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Male body shape article needed
The article is already requested in articles for creation but it would be nice to have this done sooner rather than later. Please if anyone would be willing to help out. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:44, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
RFC that may affect this project
There is an RFC that may affect a page in this project at WikiProject Tree of Life. The topic is Confusion over taxonomy of subtribe Panina and taxon homininae (are chimps hominins)?
History and founders of Anthropology
I am participating in a discussion at Talk:Anthropology regarding how best to describe the early history of the discipline including its founding figures and the relation between the various subdisciplines, and the conceptual history of the term "anthropology". Participation by as many anthropologically inclined editors as possible would improve the outcome of the discussions. ·maunus · snunɐɯ· 16:45, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Presentations and pluralisations of peoples
- The following OP has been multiply posted and my suggestion is that Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (ethnicities and tribes) might act as a centralised location for related discussion.
Use of the pluralisation of a demonym where this is possible
A recent successful RM was made for the following:
- Azerbaijani people → Azerbaijanis
- Bahamian people →
- Bangladeshi people → Bangladeshis
- Barbadian people → Barbadians
- Bolivian people → Bolivians
- Chilean people → Chileans
- Colombian people → Colombians
– And many similar articles which, on the same president, I would like moved - as would apply to all demonym based population describing articles in those cases those cases in which the plural form of the demonym differs from the singular form of the word.
(explanation was given)
As per: Albanians, Americans, Armenians, Australians, Austrians, List of Bahranis, Belarusians, Bosnians, Brazilians, Bulgarians, Lists of Cameroonians and Canadians, ...
As per WP:UCRN as demonstrated in searches ...
On this basis I would suggest that any editor with authority to directly make sensible changes to article and category contents could go ahead and make sensible moves (as relevant to article content naturally).
I would say that this issue also relates to content in which two ethnicities are mentioned such that relating to Afghan American(s) and perhaps this will also need to be sorted out at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ethnicities and tribes).
I propose that the table on that project page might read as something like the following:
|Use pluralisation of a demonym
when this is practical
|Koreans · Germans · Swedes|
|Use ".. people" when pluralisation
of the demonym is not practical
|French people · Wauja people|
|Groups where two
ethnicities are referenced
Afghans in the United Kingdom
|Parenthetical disambiguation||Macedonians (ethnic group)|
Peoples for which two nationalities/ethnicities/descents are referenced
In the case of people who are described by use of two national/ethnic descriptions I was interested to see the navigational content at: British Korean which reads as follow:
British Korean or Korean British may refer to:
- Koreans in the United Kingdom
- British people in North Korea
- British people in South Korea
- North Korea-United Kingdom relations
- South Korea-United Kingdom relations
- Eurasian (mixed ancestry) people of Korean and British descent
Mention of this content is also made at: Wikipedia talk:UK Wikipedians' notice board#What to do with articles for Britains with other nationalities, ethnicities and/or descents and, as potentially an example of good practice, I thought I would also present this content "here".
- Again, this OP has been multiply posted and my suggestion is that Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (ethnicities and tribes) might act as a centralised location for related discussion. This is by no means meant as a discouragement of location specific discussion.
"Man" infobox bias
The article about man has an infobox collage of male pictures, the selection of which seems bias and arbitrary. The editors prevent members from editing it without first suggesting it on the talk page, but a few editors seem to have final say and they favor pictures of men they personally favor for arbitrary reasons. I implore members of the WikiProject Anthropology to chime in on this topic, as I have suggested one image, perhaps a classic representation of man, be displayed. JosephSpiral (talk) 22:43, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello again! Here's a draft we'd appreciate if you reviewed: Draft:Geometric Morphometrics in Anthropology, Draft:Shell tools in the Philippines, Draft:Philippine prehistoric beads and Draft:Philippine Jade Artifacts. Thanks once more, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 16:45, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Article on Avi Tuschman and Our Political Nature: The Evolutionary Origins of What Divides Us
ITN candidate Australopithecus deyiremeda
RfC at Homo naledi
Interested editors are invited to comment at Talk:Homo_naledi#RfC:_a_dozen_articles_rejected_by_Nature. --Animalparty! (talk) 07:20, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: the article is currently protected until the dispute is resolved. Consensus is needed to resolve the dispute and resume article improvement. --Animalparty! (talk) 00:24, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
When I was doing research for different topic I came across lot of anthropological, historical researched references to Pole-star worship This is a request to develope a good article on this issue. (Pl.avoid ocnfusion,Pole worship is distinct)
Not sure what to make of this article. The lead says "Genetic anthropology (Human genetics) is a branch of human genetics" and then says it's a "field of anthropology." I removed an unsourced section which said:
"There seems to be a divide in the academic community as to what is Genetic Anthropology and what is Molecular Anthropology. There are many universities that offer degrees in Genetic Anthropology or Anthropological Genetics, while others offer degrees in Molecular Anthropology, but all are considered to be under the umbrella of Evolutionary Anthropology. In most universities genetic anthropology is taught in conjunction with other anthropological areas such as paleoanthropology, primatology, human biology, Bioarchaeology and osteology."
Article upgrade assistance request (Pre-translation stage)
Hi, I am looking for support for a relatively new umbrella article on en-wikipedia named Ceremonial pole. Undersigned seeks your help specially to improve defenition and lead sections of the article.
Ceremonial pole is a human tradition since ancient times; either existed in past at some point of time, or still exists in some cultures across global continents from north to south & from east to west. Ceremonial poles are used to symbolize a variety of concepts in several different world cultures.
Through article Ceremonial pole we intend to take encyclopedic note of cultural aspects and festive celebrations and dances around Ceremonial pole as an umbrella article and want to have historical, mythological, anthropological aspects, reverence or worships wherever concerned as a small part.
While Ceremonial poles have a long past and strong presence but usually less discussed subject. Even before we seek translation of this article in global languages, we need to have more encyclopedic information/input about Ceremonial poles from all global cultures and languages. And we seek your assistance in the same.
Since other contributors to the article are insisting for reliable sources and Standard native english; If your contributions get deleted (for some reason like linguistics or may be your information is reliable but unfortunately dosent match expectations of other editors) , please do list the same on Talk:Ceremonial pole page so that other wikipedians may help improve by interlanguage collaborations, and/or some other language wikipedias may be interested in giving more importance to reliablity of information over other factors on their respective wikipedia.
This request is made to you since culture related topics may be of intrest to you.
Thanking you with warm regards
Semitic people merge discussion
Forgive me if this is in the wrong place, I do not know my way around Wikipedia and its protocols at all. I am alerting you to the fact that an article of interest to you (and you are marked as this article being relevant to you) is currently being debated for removal/merging. It is being argued (I believe wrongly) that the article is irrelevant and has no place in having its own page, so I do think someone from your group should keep an eye on the discussion on the talk page. They already merged the article today into another article without any discussion but I managed to get an admin to move it back again. Conversation has now started on the talk page and I think it is definitely something you will want to keep an eye on. Talk page here; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Semitic_people Taurusthecat (talk) 14:13, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Taurusthecat, thanks for the heads up! I'll take a look at the discussion and hopefully can add to it. In the future you may want to look at WP:CANVAS which is a policy about how to advertise ongoing discussions. Alerting wikiprojects to ongoing discussions is fine, but you want to make sure that your notification is neutral and doesn't bias people coming to the discussion. Happy editing! Wugapodes (talk) 19:33, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thankyou for the advice, appreciated. It seems some people are determined to merge this page elsewhere, I think to bury the information, also numerous small edits are being done now in an effort to make the material seem less and less relevant, I guess to support deleting/merging the material later. I have noticed that this article (which has been around for quite a few years with much effort put into it) is of particular interest of a large number of focus groups, so I do think it is important for it to be monitored. As the article stands and as far as I can tell, it is extremely factual and contains much useful information, it would be a shame for it to be eroded away and finally removed. As the subject matter is sensitive to some and can elicit emotional interpretations according to their own personal views, it is important the article remains un-biased, factual and complete and is not vandalized. Taurusthecat (talk) 22:12, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- What did you have in mind? I don't know about the topic and I've only skimmed the article at this point, but there are some words I might put in a different order if I had written it, like I might swap the first and second sentences, for example. I could tweak some grammatical things here and there, but I wasn't sure if you want feedback or were just pointing out this article more generally? Permstrump (talk) 15:41, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- @user:Permstrump. Well... first, this page is part of a research project : m:Research:Wikipedia Primary School SSAJRP programme and as part of the project, this is one of the 100 or so pages that we hope to see improved in the course of the project. Now... whilst I was looking on the talk page at the assessments proposed by the wikiprojsects it is associated with, I saw important discrepancies (from start to C level). Not surprisingly so as many of the assessment were made a long time ago. Hence my request to review.
- Now, any improvement to the article itself would be great as well :) Anthere (talk)
Proposed article move from Syro-Palestinian archaeology to Levantine archaeology
There is a proposal to move from Syro-Palestinian archaeology to Levantine archaeology here and to create separate pages for Archaeology of Syria and Archaeology of Palestine. Your opinions would be welcome, thanks! Drsmoo (talk) 07:34, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Please visit and help
Hello friends. The following articles could really use some neutral input:
Nomination of List of films featuring whitewashed roles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of films featuring whitewashed roles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films featuring whitewashed roles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 14:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Proposed Merger of Cultural entomology and Ethnoentomology
I was thumbing through articles that needed work for WikiProject Insects and found that Cultural entomology has a (very old) proposed merge with Ethnoentomology. There are no comments on the Cultural entomology page, but one vote for and against merger at the Ethnoentomology page. These articles cover a lot of the same ground, and the merge request was never settled. Please provide additional comments on the talk page M. A. Broussard (talk) 04:10, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
User:The Ungovernable Force/Wikiproject Anthropology looks like it was the first precursor to the creation of this project. I've listed it for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:The Ungovernable Force/Wikiproject Anthropology but if someone thinks it should be kept (historical reasons?), maybe it can be moved to somewhere in this project space, please vote keep at the MFD. Thanks! -- Ricky81682 (talk) 20:33, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Help expand an article?
Hi! I recently chose to redirect the article Postpartum confinement, as someone nominated it for deletion saying that it didn't expand on Postpartum_period#East_Asia. It looks like the section Postpartum_period#Cultures covers confinement, but I can see the merit in having a separate article that goes into this in greater detail across the various cultures and discussing this in more general detail on a cultural level.
Duplication in articles on consanguinity, incest, etc.
Trouble finding references? The Wikipedia Library is proud to announce ...
Alexander Street Press (ASP) is an electronic academic database publisher. Its "Academic Video Online" collection includes videos in a range of subject areas, including news programs (notably shows like 60 minutes), music and theatre, lectures and demonstrations, and documentaries. The Academic Video Online: Premium collection would be useful for researching topics related to science, history, music and dance, anthropology, business, counseling and therapy, news, nursing, drama, and more. For more details see their website.
100% Shameless Canvassing
Trying to get a goon squad together to tackle war. The article is in shambles. It's rated high importance by this WikiProject, so I'm trying to get some goons. Please goon over and see if we can get something going. TimothyJosephWood 17:54, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
We're missing a number of specific-culture articles that are redlinks at Cultural periods of Peru. At this point we even have an article on the Chiribaya dog mummies, but not the culture and people they were buried with. Seems a bit backwards. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 16:13, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Need help with Cyber-ethnography article
Hi all hope you are having a great day. Please contribute to the discussion on Talk:Cyber-ethnography#Image_on_page_under_section_.22The_range_of_methodologies.22 --Have a great day :) , Sanjev Rajaram (talk) 00:35, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
RfC notice: image montages of individual faces on ethnicity and other demonym articles
Please participate in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Images#Proposed repeal of WP:NOETHNICGALLERIES. It is a proposal to vacate the previous consensus reached in the February 2016 RfC that resulted in the creation of the MOS:NOETHNICGALLERIES provision at MOS:IMAGES, and also relates thematically to Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 127#RfC: Ethnicity in infoboxes (all of these discussions are ultimately about using infoboxes to identify individuals as members of particular ethnicities, and this relates also to MOS:IDENTITY). — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 17:24, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
RM on anti-national sentiment
Looking for feedback on a tool on Visual Editor to add open license text from other sources
I'm designing a tool for Visual Editor to make it easy for people to add open license text from other sources, there are a huge number of open license sources compatible with Wikipedia including around 9000 journals. I can see a very large opportunity to easily create a high volume of good quality articles quickly. I have done a small project with open license text from UNESCO as a proof of concept, any thoughts, feedback or endorsements (on the Meta page) would be greatly appreciated.
Missing article: Native American nation
Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America#Major missing article: Native American nation. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 13:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Category move for discussion
There is a proposal being discussed for moving (or renaming) Category:Science organizations by topic to Category:Organizations by academic discipline. The discussion is here  (at CfD). ----Steve Quinn (talk) 03:08, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Request for comments
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!