Wikipedia talk:WikiProject British and Irish hills

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject British and Irish hills    (Inactive)
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject British and Irish hills, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Stub articles for the Munros[edit]

After glancing at the List of Munros I noticed there an awful lot missing their own articles.

I've made a start and done the following in the last couple of days:

The sources used are munromagic, The Munros, Scottish Mountaineering Trust, 1986, Donald Bennett and If anyone wants to help (there are about 118 left to do!) it'd be appreciated. Cheers, Nk.sheridan   Talk 21:17, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

all my stubs need photos if anyone has anything. Probably best to add to wikicommons and link to there. Nk.sheridan   Talk 21:20, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Geograph can be a very good source for suitably licensed photos, although its coverage is less good for Scotland. Suicidalhamster (talk) 22:47, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello! I've started to add some more Munro articles, so far Glas Tulaichean and Beinn Bhreac - again these need photos - I've climbed them in cloud unfortunately! I'll continue to make slow but steady progress but am currently targeting hills I am familiar with Nick Ottery (talk) 12:49, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Article alerts[edit]

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 08:54, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement[edit]

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:02, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Template:Infobox mountain changes[edit]

As some may have noticed I have been updating articles to conform with the new syntax used by {{Infobox mountain}}. As I'm doing this manually with the help of AutoWikiBrowser, I have had the opportunity to look over thousands of articles. There are a few things that might be improved upon. The first is that most articles that fall under the preview of this project use Ordinance Survey grid references rather than global coordinates as we do in North America. I have also noticed that more than a few of articles use the template {{coord}} either in the Infobox mountain template or at the bottom of the page. I assume this is done so that coordinate data appears in the title line of the article so that it can be read by web crawlers.

Currently, when the coord template is use or global coordinate data is entered using the new method, both the OS and the coordinates labels appear even if the coord display parameter is set to title. I will fix this if there is no objection from the members of this project.

There are at least two good reasons to do this:

  1. Entering the global coordinates enables the use of a location map with an automatically generated position marker.
  2. Using my proposed modification would cause the global coordinates entered in the infobox using the new method to display only in the title line only and not in the infobox. This avoids the awkwardness of entering the data at the end of the article page.
  3. If you wish to implement this change I will go through the articles that display your project banner on there talk page and convert data entered using the coordinate template to the new method.

To understand the two different ways of entering global coordinate data see the template documentation. The first uses the template coord and the second uses the latitude and longitude parameters.

I hope that those interested will express there opinion here or on the template talk page. I have some other ideas but one thing at a time. –droll [chat] 03:44, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

British and Irish hills articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release[edit]

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the British and Irish hills articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 22:08, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Moelfre (hill)[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Moelfre (hill) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced article with no mention of notability, fails WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 22:46, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

I don't see any other deletion notices than here. This hill is a Marilyn and is mentioned in multiple secondary sources (I added references to two). I believe it clearly meets WP:N. Please do not delete it. —hike395 (talk) 07:25, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Wainwright's Outlying Fells[edit]

None of these are within the project's list of "key mountains" (only Walna Scar cracks 2000ft, and it isn't a Marilyn), but editors interested in the project might be interested in those hills too.

After climbing Black Combe last week I looked in Wikipedia to answer a question: is it the 2nd highest of the Outlying Fells, after Walna Scar, as we thought? No answer.

I found the article The Outlying Fells of Lakeland, which has a list in A-Z order of the summits mentioned in the book, apparently split out in Feb 2008 from an early List of Wainwrights. Some blue links, a lot of red links, and a few unlinked names (from where someone in 2010 had cleaned up the links which pointed to positively wrong places) such as two "The Knott"s. I've now resolved all those unlinked names, creating articles, hatnotes etc as needed to sort out ambiguous names.

There is also a template: {{Outlying Fells}}. In the state where I found it it linked to about 24 summits, mix of red and blue links.

I thought about it and decided that the 56 individual chapters of the book probably constitute Notable hills, and the other summits in the list should become redirects to their chapters, and be mentioned, with height, and bolded, in the articles on those chapters. I also felt that the template should reflect this, and have revamped it to: {{Outlying Fells}}.

I think the list in the main article could usefully be converted into a sortable table, with columns for name, chapter, number of chapter (or page no in book) (to allow sorting into book order which is roughly geographic), height. That would have answered the question which brought me to the whole topic (which the splendid The Database of British and Irish Hills provided when I found it).

For now, I've added the highest and lowest three summits to the article. I've also created articles for quite a few of the redlinked summits/chapters, adding "Howes" as a section of Branstree and adding Circuit of Devoke Water as a section of the existing Devoke Water. Sorted out various dab problems, etc, on the way, as you do. Will continue to work my way through it when the mood inspires.

I recognise that some of these summits are at the margins of notability, but the fact that they're in the LDWA's Hill Walker's Register seems to tip the balance into making it appropriate to have each of the summits given a mention and a redirect in the encyclopedia, though not necessarily its own article, and the chapters of the book seem a reasonable arrangement. I've found photos in Commons, mostly Geograph, for the articles I've done so far.

If you have any sourced encyclopedic content on any of these fells, please expand the articles, or create the ones I haven't yet done.

Any comments? PamD 09:04, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Only one: good work! I think you're going about this in exactly the right way, and a sortable table would be a great improvement. --Stemonitis (talk) 09:08, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for instant kind words! I'm planning to turn all the red links blue first and then work on how to do the table. PamD 09:11, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
I've knocked a table together. I don't have Wainwright's book, so I can't add chapter/page numbers, nor can I tell which names he uses for the summits. It should be straightfoward to add that information, though. --Stemonitis (talk) 10:46, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Well, almost three weeks later, I've now created or upgraded an article for each of the 56 chapters, with redirects from all the named summits. I'll see what I can do with the table, when I get round to it - I really like the idea of being able to sort by chapter, either A-Z or book order, but also want to have dummy entries for major alternative names of summits, and for book chapters which aren't summits. It will come, in time. PamD 15:19, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

And now I think I've finished. Table has the two extra columns, various alternative names are crossreferenced, etc. I hope people will find it useful! PamD 13:04, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

List of Furths[edit]

I've just created this list of Furths and added the link to the relevant navbox. Feel free to check and improve the list and to turn the Irish section into a full table. --Bermicourt (talk) 20:08, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Further to my last (pardon the pun); I've now created Category:Furths and started articles for all the missing Furths (all in Ireland).

The new ones are: Beenkeragh, Caher, Caher West Top, Maolán Bui, The Bones, Cnoc an Chuillin, The Big Gun and Cruach Mhór. Please feel free to expand. --Bermicourt (talk) 21:11, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal[edit]

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject X is live![edit]

WikiProject X icon.svg

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lists of Marilyns[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svgTemplate:Lists of Marilyns has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Nessie (talk) 18:24, 21 March 2019 (UTC)