Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics/United States comics work group

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Comics / United States (Rated Project-class)
WikiProject icon This page is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.
 Project  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by the United States comics work group.
edit·history·watch·refresh Stock post message.svg To-do list for Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/United States comics work group:

First aim[edit]

As the remit of this group is to put more focus on non-Marvel/DC articles I think the first aim should be to get the entries for the main publishers as quite a few of them have only just managed to shake off notability tags and still need a lot of work, sometimes to less the impact of editing by people connected to the company. So for example: Dark Horse Comics. (Emperor 14:08, 28 October 2007 (UTC))


I was just adding the work group to Devil's Due Productions and spotted the fact that List of Devil's Due Productions publications wasn't even linked in from there and the list there isn't as long as the one on the actual page.

This got my thinking as Dark Horse Comics, Image Comics, IDW Publishing, etc. all have big old lists on their main page which seems unnecessary and leads to bulky and unwieldy pages. It struck me all we really need there are the current titles and then we can keep the big assed lists on a separate page. Oddly Dark Horse has a separate list for List of current Dark Horse Comics publications which seems to be the wrong way round to me, obviously current publication lists take a bit more work to stay up-to-date and having them on the main page seems ideal as they get the focus there.

So that is what I'm suggesting (and exactly the kind of thing the project is for ;) ): Keep the main page for a company history and current publications and move the lists of titles to a separate entry.

Thoughts? (Emperor 15:03, 29 October 2007 (UTC))

Not specific for these articles (not my specialty), but in general, I dislike the focus on "current" in any Wikipedia article, be it the "current squad" of a sports team or the "current magazines" from a publisher. The "current" are no more important than any that have stopped, and are too much in need of reworking. More logical (all IMO) would be a list of major "whatever" (players, magazines, series), e.g. for a publisher, all magazines with more than 5 years or 100 issues (random numbers) are listed in the main article, and a link to the complete list of publications is given (separate article). It makes little sense to not list a series that ran for thirty years and 1500 issues in the main article, but on the other hand to list a 6 issue miniseries, only because the second is "current". Fram 15:33, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
I'd see a few things there - firstly important works that have a few years under their belt and/or a big following are going to be mentioned in the actual history of the publisher in a more prose style which actually explains their importance. Equally, I have seen articles with sections for "notable titles" and it is impossible to police because they are so subjective and the "notable" always gets knocked off - leaving us where we are now.
My idea for keeping the current series on the front page was because they'd tend to get updated rather than if they are lost on some sub-page - its clear the list of current Dark Horse publications doesn't get updated often enough to be viable where it is.
Of course, this raises the other option I didn't mention - don't have any lists of publications on the main page. There isn't really a need to have a list of any publications on the main page if there is a separate page with them on. This could have the effect of forcing people to actually write longer histories rather than simply dropping an item into a list. On reflection, this seems like the option I might lean towards although I'd need to ponder the issue some more before coming to a firm conclusion. (Emperor 15:50, 29 October 2007 (UTC))
Either a complete list in the main article (for minor publishers with a short list) or a separate complete list is probably the best option. Such a list can be made into a good, informative table (not just a list of names), with first and last publication, number of issues, and probably a few things more as well. This would probably be the best option in most cases. Fram 15:53, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
I like your idea of a table as there is a real limit to the usefulness of a simple list (as currently exist) unless you are quickly looking for the link and moving on. What would you do about things, like Hellboy published largely as limited series? Have them in the same cell or something more cunning?
If we went down this road I could see how we could "add value" to the list which we couldn't do on the mainpage without drowning out the important bits. (Emperor 17:49, 29 October 2007 (UTC))
...And that's where my limits of knowledge wrt superhero comics and the US scene comes in. I don't know enough about all this, I have indeed noticed a multitude of miniseries, one-offs, crossovers, ... The good old days of Action Comics 1 - 9999 seem far away sometimes. How to actually turn this into a readable, informative table is something else. In some cases, something like the tables in Buffy comics may be preferable (ordered from an in-universe perspective), in other cases an ordering by publication date (out-of-universe) may be better... I'll let the members of this work group decide on that :-) Fram 19:58, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
No problem - it is less about the actual publications and more about stylistic/layout issues - which tend to be more universal (so your input has been very useful). I'll have a look around the various options and see what I can come up - perhaps sandboxing something to see how it looks. (Emperor 15:13, 2 November 2007 (UTC))
Just chip in to say I agree with the consensus here. Tables seems to be the way to go after a perusal of featured lists. With Hellboy I'd just list them by publication date, or maybe split them onto a separate page along with BPRD books. Hiding Talk 00:14, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

"Manga-style" OEL comics[edit]

Are you guys handling the original English-language comics published by companies like Tokyopop? Bizenghast, I Luv Halloween are a couple of examples. As I was putting together some resources for the world comics group, I realized that Anime News Network might be helpful for some general info and news on those types of series. It's an independent, pretty complete database for "manga-style" comics and is, by and large, considered pretty reliable. Great as a starting point, anyway! --hamu♥hamu (TALK) 03:31, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme[edit]

As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.

  • The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
  • The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
  • A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:03, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for United States comics[edit]

Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:24, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Article alerts[edit]

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:48, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

Does your WikiProject care about talk pages of redirects?[edit]

Does your project care about what happens to the talk pages of articles that have been replaced with redirects? If so, please provide your input at User:Mikaey/Request for Input/ListasBot 3. Thanks, Matt (talk) 02:29, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Sources in FURs[edit]

Right now I'm going through Category:Comics images lacking original published source and sorting the images by work group. The US related images are at Category:Comics images lacking original published source/US.

If it's ok, I'm going to ad this clean up to the "to do" list.

- J Greb (talk) 15:19, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement[edit]

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 04:06, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

United States comics articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release[edit]

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the United States comics articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Sunday, November 14th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of November, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

If you have already provided feedback, we deeply appreciate it. For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 16:38, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposal to add United States comics work group under WikiProject United States[edit]

Hi, I am a member of WikiProject United States, it was recently suggested that the United States comics work group might be inactive or semi active and it might be beneficial to include it in the list of projects supported by WikiProject United States, which Kumioko have added some of the projects like WikiProject American television and WikiProject United States Government. After reviewing the project it appears that there have not been any active discussion on the talk page in some time and the only content updates appear to be simple maintenance so being supported by a larger project might be beneficial. This discussion is intended to start the process of determining if the project members are interested in the project being added to the projects supported by WikiProject United States. Any thoughts? JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 07:22, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

I have added United States comics work group to the WikiProject United States banner since there any no objections. I will begin to asses some of the articles myself. If have any concerns or questions, please let me know or ask at the project. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 22:46, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination as a United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month candidate[edit]

One or more articles relating to this project have been nominated to be a future United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month. All editors interested in improving these articles or voting for next months collaboration are encouraged to participate here. --Kumioko (talk) 19:37, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States[edit]

WikiProject United States logo.svg

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

--Kumioko (talk) 01:35, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects[edit]

WikiProject United States logo.svg

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 18:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposal for United States A-Class review process[edit]

There is a proposal at WikiProject United States to start an A-Class review process for United States related articles. Please stop by and join the discussion. Kumioko (talk) 02:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

George Herriman FAC[edit]

I've nominated the George Herriman article for FAC, with the hope of having it appear as Today's Featured Article on 13 October 2013, which is the 100th anniversary of his signature work, Krazy Kat. Any attention, feedback, and support would be greatly appreciated. Curly Turkey (gobble) 16:34, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Discussion to remove the Automatically assessed logic from the WikiProject United States template[edit]

Greetings, there is a discussion regarding removal of the logic used to populate Automatically assessed article categories from Template:WikiProject United States. Most of the categories (over 220 Wikipedia wide) were deleted in February 2013 because they were empty. These categories were previously populated by a bot that hasn't run since 2011 and the categories aren't used. Removal of this uneeded/unused logic will greatly reduce the size and complexity of the WikiProject United States template. Any comments or questions are encouraged here. Kumioko (talk) 18:20, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Lest there is any confusion for people who don't speak the same language, the words "logic used to populate Automatically assessed article categories" refer to the feature that was supposed to allow this WikiProject's template to "inherit" class and importance ratings from other WikiProjects. Kumioko says that there are no longer any bots performing the function that formerly copied those ratings. --Orlady (talk) 23:36, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Little Nemo (1911 film) Featured Article canditature[edit]

I've put up Little Nemo (1911 film) as a Featured Article canditate, and would appreciate any and all feedback on the article. Please join in the discussion at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Little Nemo (1911 film)/archive1. Curly Turkey (gobble) 07:53, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Wanted GA reassessment[edit]

I've opened a community GA reassessment of Wanted. The article has had quite a fall from grace since its promotion in 2009, and I believe it needs to be demoted. Corvoe (speak to me) 15:53, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

RfC participation request[edit]

I realize this might be a little out there, but seeing as how comings are one of the most frequently adapted media... There's an RfC regarding a single-line chapter-to-episode section over in Oathkeeper, though it's mostly an RS issue. Any participation would be welcome. Darkfrog24 (talk) 01:41, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Please See - Submissions[edit]
--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 00:48, 6 August 2016 (UTC)