Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Companies

Qc Terme

I have created a new page about the italian company qc Terme and i woukd greatly appreciate your help in reviewing it.I need the page to be approved by December 31st. The draft is called Draft:QC_Terme . I would be grateful for any feedback or suggestions to make the article acceptable for publication.

Benjamin Electric Manufacturing Company

This needs work. Bearian (talk) 01:22, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

@Bearian:, Lots of work. I found enough to verify it's notable and there is this which is a starting point (although will need to find more reliable sources to support what is in that source). Will likely take a while.--CNMall41 (talk) 07:28, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. Bearian (talk) 10:51, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

@Bearian:, just finished up what I could. Have a look and trim if necessary. About as far as I could get. There are a few images in Commons but don't see any of them as being relevant. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:51, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you! Bearian (talk) 07:07, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gas City, Ltd.

The article Gas City, Ltd. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged as Unreferenced for 8 years. No other language has a reliably sourced article from which to translate. Never was notable as a company.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 20:40, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Sinclair Oil Corporation

In the last few days a large amount of content was removed from Sinclair Oil Corporation.

Is this what the community wants or a rogue editor? 2A02:2455:8423:4800:DF2E:D34:6C9:45E2 (talk) 19:32, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Update stats in Project Management Institute infobox

Hi editors! My name is MaryKate, and I'm employed by Project Management Institute. I have an open request to update the infobox, and wondered if I can improve its independent sourcing.

Let me know if there are any questions or concerns. Hope to see you over on the PMI Talk page! MK at PMI (talk) 14:08, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Answered on the talk page. Seem simple enough. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:47, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Adtalem Global Education

Hello! On behalf of Adtalem Global Education, I have submitted a few COI edit requests to improve the article from a Wikipedia perspective. The article has had two warning banners for over a decade and my requests are related to acquisitions and divestitures, history, campuses and enrollment, and finances.

I'm seeking editor assistance to review and implement the requests appropriately, if any project members are interested in taking a look. Thanks for your consideration, Inkian Jason (talk) 14:55, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Looking for help with Trimble History section

Hello, I'm an employee at Trimble checking to see if any editors at this WikiProject might have time to review a History section draft I've placed on the Trimble Talk page. The draft significantly expands the existing section by filling in informational gaps. It also clarifies existing passages and firms up the section's sourcing. Thanks in advance to any folks here who take the time to review it! Jeremy at Trimble (talk) 20:42, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Highbridge Multi-Strategy Fund

The article Highbridge Multi-Strategy Fund has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged as unsourced for 6 years. I can't find significant coverage, just listings. Possibly defunct?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 05:31, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Toast. Looks like it was liquidated in 2022 and there is very little as far as sourcing. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:40, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Air Greenland

Air Greenland has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:23, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

StubHub

Hi WikiProject Companies, I have a COI edit request over at StubHub that may be of interest to folks here. Would love any thoughts or feedback you might have! Cheers Stephanie BINK (talk) 21:39, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Asking for help with update to Eli Lilly and Company introduction

Hello, I'm an employee at Eli Lilly and Company, and I'm on this WikiProject to ask if any editors here would be interested in reviewing an update I'm requesting to the Lilly article's introduction. It's a pretty short request, so hopefully it won't take much time to inspect. Here's a link to the request. If you have any questions about it, please don't hesitate to ask. Thanks! JWatLilly (talk) 17:22, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Request for review: Draft SavATree article (COI)

Disclosure: I am an employee of SavATree (my COI statement is on my User page). Because of this conflict of interest, I am not editing the SavATree article directly. I have prepared a draft article in a neutral tone with independent, reliable sources. Could an uninvolved editor please review the draft and, if appropriate, move it into the main article space? The draft is available in my sandbox here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AnnMEdits/sandbox Thank you very much for your time and assistance! AnnMEdits (talk) 22:18, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for The Churchill Machine Tool Company

The Churchill Machine Tool Company has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:39, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Request for review: California Closets COI edit

Hello WikiProject Companies editors,

I’m a paid editor who has disclosed my status on my user page. I recently submitted an edit request on Talk:California Closets to update factual and sourced content, but haven’t received a response after several weeks.

Could someone please review the pending COI edit request and provide feedback? I’ve formatted it according to the {{request edit}} guidelines.

Link to my request: Talk:California Closets#Proposed update to History section (Paid editor disclosure)

Thank you for your time and help! Meredithjg (talk) 16:44, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

@Meredithjg:, you will need to follow WP:COIREQUEST. I took a look at the talk page and you have not added the COI template in order to move it into the COI edit queue. Once you do, an editor will come along in time and review the request. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:18, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Seeking notability evidence for Millennium Interactive

Millennium Interactive's Wikipedia entry survived a deletion vote in 2007, but was redirected to its successor company by an editor in 2017. I would imagine Millennium, which released over 30 games, to be notable in its own right, but since most of its activity was pre-web, it is hard to find independent sources. The argument has been made that reviews of the company's games do not confer noteworthiness, as per WP:COMPANY.

I would therefore be interested if someone could find relevant sources to establish noteworthiness in order to restore the article. Only a Floor Tile (talk) 05:36, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Answered at Talk:Guerrilla Cambridge.--CNMall41 (talk) 06:14, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

@CNMall41 – Thanks for the guidance. I have added "edit COI" to move this request into the COI edit queue. Meredithjg (talk) 16:09, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

I don't think you are replying to the right thing @Meredithjg. NotJamestack (✉️|📝) 16:45, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

@Meredithjg:, I don't mind helping PAID editors, but it seems you are just throwing things against the wall here. Competency is still required on your part. You have left the template on this page instead of the talk page of the article where it belongs. See WP:COIREQUEST and make sure you understand the proper procedure for making such requests. Otherwise, it is highly unlikely that anyone will respond to your request. --CNMall41 (talk) 00:38, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Disagreement over past vs present tense at Rogue Ales

The company has shut down operations and is in the process of going through bankruptcy process and per the sources, it has future meetings with creditors. To me, this isn't a company that had already dissolved. Several temp accounts keep changing it to the past tense, but I believe it's correct to keep it in the present tense until formally recognized as dissolved. What is the standard MOS for companies articles? Graywalls (talk) 22:24, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

@Graywalls:, technically it would still be a company until it legally dissolves, even though it ceased operations. I am not really how sure to phrase it but keeping the "is" for the time being is something I would support until we has sources that talk about it in the past tense. I have watchlisted for now.--CNMall41 (talk) 00:43, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Soros Fund Management

Hi editors, I have an edit request at Soros Fund Management that may be of interest to folks here. Cheers BINK Robin (talk) 22:00, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Request for Review – Robert Half Article

Hi WikiProject Companies,

I’ve identified areas in the Robert Half article that could be updated for accuracy and improved sourcing. I’ve drafted a proposed revision in my sandbox and noted this on the article’s Talk page.

As I have a conflict of interest (COI) due to my affiliation with Robert Half, I will not edit the article directly. Feedback and review from independent editors would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! ~~~~ NeutralEditorCA (talk) 01:39, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Titra Studios

The article Titra Studios has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged as Unreferenced for 16 years. Tagged for notability concerns for 6 years. Fails the relevant notability guidelines.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Bearian (talk) 12:40, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Responded on the talk page. Borderline, but I will try if the prod is removed. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:26, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Discussion about WikiProject banner templates

For WikiProjects that participate in rating articles, the banners for talk pages usually say something like:

• "This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale."

There is a proposal to change the default wording on the banners to say "priority" instead of "importance". This could affect the template for your group. Please join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council#Proposal to update wording on WikiProject banners. Stefen 𝕋ower ^{Huddle • Handiwerk} 19:40, 6 December 2025 (UTC) (on behalf of the WikiProject Council)

Edit request for Better.com

Hello WikiProject Companies editors. There is a request at Talk:Better.com#Funding_summary if editors care to review it. Disclosure: I am an employee at Better (Better Home & Finance Holding Company). KC at Better (talk) 17:43, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Answered on the talk page. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:29, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

DigiM Solution company page

Hi, I submitted a requested article for DigiM Solution at Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies/A-E#D articles. I believe it meets notability criteria through secondary sources. Any advice or help from editors would be appreciated. Dhrubojyoti1 (talk) 20:11, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasuben Pizza (2nd nomination)

Could use some additional opinions on the source assessment at Jasuben Pizza. Seems to be an issue between what constitutes WP:CORPDEPTH and what constitutes WP:CHURNALISM. CNMall41 (talk) 04:29, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Proposed acquisition of Warner Bros.#Requested move 15 December 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Proposed acquisition of Warner Bros.#Requested move 15 December 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 04:35, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

JBS Financials

Hi editors, I have a COI request to update financials in the JBS N.V. article that may be of interest to folks here. I would appreciate any feedback! Hailey at JBS (talk) 18:33, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Answered on the talk page. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:15, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Credit Suisse

Credit Suisse has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:36, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

Joris Ide Draft

I’ve drafted an article on Joris Ide in Draft space and would appreciate any feedback from editors familiar with construction or building materials companies. Draft:Joris Ide AlexisJRI (talk) 08:55, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

@AlexisJRI:, if you are looking for a review, you will need to click the "submit draft" button near the top of the draft. I did give it a quick look and will tell you it would not pass as the sources do not meet WP:ORGCRIT. Have a look at WP:CORPDEPTH and try to find sources that match that criteria. This is how to show notability in Wikipedia. Also, if you used ChatGTP or another AI-program for assistance, please review it carefully to ensure it is accurate. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:58, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

@CNMall41: Thanks for the review. I’ve updated the draft to address WP:ORGCRIT/WP:CORPDEPTH by adding multiple independent secondary sources (e.g., national and trade business coverage of the 2015 acquisition) and reducing reliance on primary/company sources. I’ve also cleaned up formatting (duplicate References removed). Would you be willing to take another look?

AlexisJRI (talk) 00:24, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Appears that someone has already reviewed the submission. For any discussion of the content going forward, please use the talk page of the draft so that it is kept in a central location. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:32, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:OKD#Requested move 28 November 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:OKD#Requested move 28 November 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vestrian24Bio 16:07, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

COI edit request for Harmony Public Schools

Hello, I'm an employee at Harmony Public Schools, a network of charter schools that operates across the state of Texas. I've placed an edit request to update the article's History section and need someone without a conflict of interest to review it. The request is fairly modest. I'm seeking to improve sourcing of existing content and add a few details about Harmony's early history as well as its growth over the past two decades. If that interests anyone at this WikiProject, you can view my request by following this link. Any help or guidance independent editors can provide would be much appreciated. Thanks! JB for Harmony (talk) 13:33, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

@JB for Harmony:, If no one gets around to reviewing, you can ping me in a week or so and I will have a look. Taking a quick look at the page itself, there are quite a few issues that need addressed such as removal of most of the awards as well as the entire section on superintendents which is basically a list of locations. The criticism information also needs to be included elsewhere on the page instead of separate WP:CSECTION. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:52, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:B&M#Requested move 24 December 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:B&M#Requested move 24 December 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vestrian24Bio 02:34, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Annovis Bio Wikipage

I work for Annovis Bio, Inc. (NYSE: ANVS) and would like to request that an independent editor create an article about the company. I'm disclosing my affiliation per COI guidelines.

Why it's notable: 1. Publicly traded on NYSE since 2020 (ticker: ANVS) https://www.nyse.com/quote/XNYS:ANVS 2. Late-stage clinical biotech with Phase 3 trials in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's 3. Coverage in peer-reviewed journals and financial media

RELIABLE SOURCES: 1. SEC Filings: https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001477845&owner=include&count=40 2. ClinicalTrials.gov entries: NCT06709014, NCT05357989, NCT07284784, NCT05686044 3. ALZFORUM database: https://www.alzforum.org/therapeutics/buntanetap 4. NeurologyLive: "Buntanetap Improves Motor, Nonmotor and Cognitive Symptoms of Parkinson Disease in Phase 3 Study" (Jan 2025) 5. Philadelphia Business Journal: https://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/news/2021/05/21/annovis-bio-berwyn-alzheimers-parkinsons.html 6. Clinical Trials Arena: https://www.clinicaltrialsarena.com/news/annovis-subject-alzheimers-trial/ 7. Parkinson's News Today: https://parkinsonsnewstoday.com/buntanetap-parkinsons-disease/ 8. Longevity Technology: https://longevity.technology/news/new-trial-data-supports-alzheimers-drug-candidates-disease-modyfing-potential/ 9. Benzinga: https://www.benzinga.com/news/health-care/25/11/48905832/annovis-bio-stock-jumps-as-new-data-shows-buntanetap-halts-cognitive-decline-in-parkinsons-patients?gc_id=23299677066&g_special_campaign=true&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=23299679256&gbraid=0AAAAADMUQ_YRoIoL2F_n7A3i6bv5eDgSK&gclid=Cj0KCQiAgvPKBhCxARIsAOlK_Epdb33yLlOCnzO-CMQ7_vJzZHK-7v3o3tUX7jpb3bPJI3PtlXuAYcoaAhlJEALw_wcB

10. Additional peer-reviewed publications available:

• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36641607/
• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38970127/
• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41008606/
• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38785991/
• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32975365/
• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29955650/
• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30906671/

DRAFT AVAILABLE: I have prepared a neutral draft and comprehensive source list that I can share with any editor who picks up this request. The draft follows Wikipedia guidelines for tone and sourcing. Thank you for considering this request. Please let me know if you need additional information or sources. Sergeevich92 (talk) 16:47, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

@Sergeevich92:, I do not see a link to the draft you have prepared. However, I did find this which is still something you have a conflict of interest with since it is related to the company. Would suggest using the WP:COIREQUEST method moving forward. Once you have the drat ready, you can ping me here and I will take a look for you. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:45, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

@Sergeevich92:, Unfortunately, that is not how it is done. Please do not copy and paste large amounts of draft text into a talk page message. I created Draft:Annovis Bio for you where you can work on the draft until you feel it is ready for review. I would also suggest reading WP:CIR as it is up to you to create the draft according to Wikipedia guidelines. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:33, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please provide comment on inclusion or non-inclusion of partnership at Hotels.com

Talk:Hotels.com#Arsenal_F.C. Someone representing Expedia Group/Hotels.com is requesting the re-addition of this statement I removed: "In 2023, Hotels.com became a multi-year sponsor of Arsenal's men's and women's teams." Sourced to https://www.90min.com/posts/arsenal-announce-multi-year-partnership-with-hotels-com which is quite rich in comments from Arsenal's as well as Hotels.com/Expedia associated sources. Sports teams and corporations form collaborative marketing and partnerships all the time. The question is whether such inclusion here has encyclopedic merit. I would appreciate editor opinions on this at the talk page. Graywalls (talk) 01:40, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

@Graywalls:, Coming here from the talk page of Hotels.com. I honestly do not have an opinion about adding it back or not as I don't know if there is real encyclopedic value or not. Just wanted to comment about the inclusion of sponsorships. I normally lean towards them being promotional and keep them off company pages per WP:NOTEVERYTHING. However, I normally don't see an issue if the company is well known for them. An example would be Coca-Cola and Microsoft. I think the better example to use for inclusion criteria would be Microsoft that gives more of a general summary than an indiscriminate list. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:30, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

I think if there are reliable sources that discuss about it and not written with extensive direct quotes from any of the involved partners, it would be worth mentioning. Otherwise, including it because the partner is a "big wig known name" is too arbitrary. Graywalls (talk) 03:33, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

I would agree with you there. I just wanted to make sure there was a distinction between what is going on with Hotels.com and sponsorships in general. Looking closer, I don't think there is encyclopedic value on the Hotels.com page but don't want to suggest we always keep them off company pages as sometimes they are. Maybe it would be different for Hotels.com if this were some type of naming rights such as Crypto.com and Crypto.com Arena (although Crypto.com could use a trim of most of its sponsorship information outside of the arena information). --CNMall41 (talk) 03:50, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Looked at Crypto.com and trimmed back some there too. I believe it looks like an excuse to feature names bigger, more recognizable and prestigious than the article's company. While some partnerships/sponsorships are notable, many are WP:DOGBITESMAN and each and every A-list celebrity involvement need not be introduced into the article, but what to include or not include is a wide gray area subject to editor consensus beyond just power flashing big name sources and big name involved parties. Graywalls (talk) 12:11, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

I honestly think there should be more trimming but won't disturb the page since you are already editing there.

Sponsorships such as these can go away in favor of short summaries saying they sponsor professional and collegiate sports teams. Things like this is what we want to avoid as they are promotional and only serve the company. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:54, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/11/airbnb-and-vrbo-are-teaming-up-to-shut-down-repeat-party-house-offenders.html this kind of partnership would be more contextually relevant than things like NASCAR sponsorship, sports team partnership etc. That example is something that uses quotes, but still includes a fair bit of writing from the journalist. Graywalls (talk) 05:45, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

I agree there as well. I think the takeaways here are that some cases are clearly promo, some are not, but many fall into a "wide gray area subject to editor consensus." Hotels.com likely falls into the third category and I don't see consensus to the addition at this point. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:16, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:PNY Technologies#Requested move 6 January 2026

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:PNY Technologies#Requested move 6 January 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vestrian24Bio 08:25, 20 January 2026 (UTC)