Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Conservatism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
  Main   Talk   Portal   Showcase   Assessment   Collaboration   Incubator   Guide   Newsroom   About Us   Commons  

Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
Q: An article was erroneously tagged by a member of this project.
A: Do not remove the banner. Ask the member why they tagged it, or post a message at the project talk page (below). Note: the banner does not imply that the subject has a conservative or right-wing ideology, has no relevance to neutral POV, nor that WikiProject Conservatism owns the article.[1]
Q: I'm a member and the banner I added to an article talk page was removed.
A: From PROGGUIDE: You may not force them to remove the banner. No editor may prohibit a group of editors from showing their interest in an article. This warning {{UWCNSV-BANNER}} can be used to notify an editor of the guideline.
Q: Can non-members tag articles?
A: Yes, but if a member removes the banner do not replace it.[1]
Q: The quality or importance rating of an article is incorrect.
A: Anyone can change the rating. Make sure to consult the assessment scale here. Ratings are subjective, importance ratings in particular can be controversial. Disputes will be resolved by project members at the project talk page (below).[2][3]
Q: What is the scope of this WikiProject?
A: As stated on the main page of this project, we are dedicated to improving articles related to conservatism, not limited to any particular form or national variety of conservatism.
edit·history·watch·refresh Stock post message.svg To-do list for WP:WikiProject Conservatism:
Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject Conservatism (Rated Project-class)
WikiProject icon This page is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia.
 Project  Quality: rating not applicable
 

Request assessment: The People's Cube[edit]

Review.png

It is requested that a member assess the quality and/or importance of the following article:

Page: The People's Cube (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Requester: user:panBK

Request assessment: Michael J. Knowles[edit]

Review.png

It is requested that a member assess the quality and/or importance of the following article:

Page: Michael J. Knowles (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Requester: user:saxonjf


Comments:

Deletion of a Wikiproject page[edit]

See Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Conservatism/IncubatorUnscintillating (talk) 00:23, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Our American Revival[edit]

Our American Revival needs a major clean-up (or an AfD) if anyone has time for it...Zigzig20s (talk) 07:44, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Ideology of Drudge Report[edit]

You are invited to participate in the RfC at Talk:Drudge Report#RfC: Should the article say that Drudge Report has been described as far-right?. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 19:21, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

RfC for pedophilia terminology at the Milo Yiannopoulos article[edit]

Opinions are needed on the following matter: Talk:Milo Yiannopoulos#RfC: Should the article include text/sources analyzing Yiannopoulos's statements on pedophilia?. A permalink for it is here. The discussion concerns whether or not to mention that sources note that Yiannopoulos's definition of pedophilia is technically correct, but also that the term is used more broadly than the technical definition (to include adults engaging in sexual activity with minors, or specifically committing child sexual abuse). Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:08, 8 November 2017 (UTC)