Wikipedia talk:WikiProject England

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject England and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4: 31 days

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be auto-archived by if there are more than 5.

Good article reassessment for Crewkerne

Crewkerne has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:39, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Fort Belvedere, Surrey

Fort Belvedere, Surrey has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 21:37, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Chronicon ex chronicis, and specifically, the Genealogia Lindisfarorum

Per a user talk page request, I have broken out Draft:Chronicon ex chronicis, one of the oldest English works, and I am specifically looking for information on the Genealogia Lindisfarorum, a genealogy reproduced as part of the book. This is outside my expertise, and I would appreciate any help with this effort. BD2412 T 01:21, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for History of Somerset

History of Somerset has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:51, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Bury F.C.

Bury F.C. has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:37, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for James Blunt

James Blunt has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 04:01, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for She: A History of Adventure

She: A History of Adventure has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:25, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Plymouth

Plymouth has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:12, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Quantock Hills

Quantock Hills has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:16, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FAR: House of Plantagenet

I have nominated House of Plantagenet for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Borsoka (talk) 04:12, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]