This page is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This confuses me, it was preserved in the National Film Registry before Eraserhead; and arguably BR has had more influence on American cinema than Casablanca (film). - RoyBoy 22:35, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
I think it is considered low-importance for WikiProject United States in general. There are a lot more U.S. topics that are more important. It may be part of the American Cinema task force, but it's a project rating, not a task-force rating. You can see under WikiProject Film, it is considered part of the core list of films. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 22:51, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply, just doesn't seem appropriate in relative to other articles within this project. - RoyBoy 04:28, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
I think you have to consider the scope of WikiProject United States. That would include the U.S. states, the Presidents, key members of Congress, landmarks, all the major historical events, etc. Film is part of it, but I am not sure if Blade Runner rates highly in that scope. I don't think it matters too much as long as it is definitely recognized as a core film by WikiProject Film. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 13:44, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
A GAR was opened up for Star Wars a month ago, and it's starting to garner comments. Lately, the article has been having issues with structure, length, disputes over the best way to summarize the elements. Due to the importance of the article, and some budding disagreement about the best way to address its issues, more eyes would be appreciated. The GAR is at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Star Wars/1. ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 19:02, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Proposed merger (Begotten and Din of Celestial Birds)