Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/American cinema task force

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Film (Rated Project-class)
WikiProject icon This page is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
 Project  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by the American cinema task force.
 
WikiProject United States / American Cinema (Rated Project-class)
WikiProject icon This page is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
 Project  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.
 

Bobby G. Can't Swim[edit]

I put this up today, and would appreciate anything anyone wants to do to improve it. Thanks. Invertzoo (talk) 22:13, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Movie Trailers from Internet Archive (SabuCat)[edit]

Movie Trailers from Internet Archive (SabuCat) Public Domain. Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 12:10, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

RFC of interest to this project.[edit]

See Talk:Natalie Portman#RFC on the inclusion of Portman's Erdos-Bacon number in the text of this article. Contribute if you have an opinion. --Jayron32 04:05, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Blade Runner low importance?[edit]

This confuses me, it was preserved in the National Film Registry before Eraserhead; and arguably BR has had more influence on American cinema than Casablanca (film). - RoyBoy 22:35, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

I think it is considered low-importance for WikiProject United States in general. There are a lot more U.S. topics that are more important. It may be part of the American Cinema task force, but it's a project rating, not a task-force rating. You can see under WikiProject Film, it is considered part of the core list of films. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 22:51, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply, just doesn't seem appropriate in relative to other articles within this project. - RoyBoy 04:28, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
I think you have to consider the scope of WikiProject United States. That would include the U.S. states, the Presidents, key members of Congress, landmarks, all the major historical events, etc. Film is part of it, but I am not sure if Blade Runner rates highly in that scope. I don't think it matters too much as long as it is definitely recognized as a core film by WikiProject Film. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 13:44, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Star Wars at GAR[edit]

A GAR was opened up for Star Wars a month ago, and it's starting to garner comments. Lately, the article has been having issues with structure, length, disputes over the best way to summarize the elements. Due to the importance of the article, and some budding disagreement about the best way to address its issues, more eyes would be appreciated. The GAR is at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Star Wars/1. ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 19:02, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed merger (Begotten and Din of Celestial Birds)[edit]

There is a discussion at Talk:Din of Celestial Birds#Merger Proposal to merge the short film article with its feature length predecessor, Begotten (film). DarkKnight2149 19:59, 2 September 2017 (UTC)