Wikipedia talk:Hinduism-related topics notice board

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Hinduism (Rated NA-class)
WikiProject icon This page is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia.
 NA  Quality: rating not applicable


The article on Abhang is a stub though it is a part of Classical Musics. I am planning on Adding more Data to it, I would request editors versed in the topic to once verify the additions. Psgs123xyz (talkcontribs) 16:29 8th December 2014

NRGA Act 2012[edit]

This article was nominated for speedy deletion. However, it seems a notable topic from the searches I have done. Could anyone with more experience in this area assist in cleaning-up this article? AusLondonder (talk) 00:09, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Defunct WikiProject Hinduism/Shaktism[edit]

Can anyone point me to the discussions of why the group is labeled as defunct? Thank you. AD64 (talk) 15:23, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Threat to article named Hinduism by Wikipedia Administrators itself[edit]

This is a proposal/complaint to wikiproject Hinduism Administrators i here by arguing that the reference working as (Note2) in article Hinduism has endangered by selfish and anti Hindu Administrators such as Dougweller see his edits for proof. He unable to bear the greatness of Hinduism and removing references and contents from Hindu articles same alike Max Muller by deleting Vedas from History so kindly protect references of article Hinduism. WP MANIKHANTA Talk 11:18, 22 May 2016 (UTC)


The Kali article could use some knowledgable eyes and editing. Technically it's a Good Article, but sources and writing have degraded sections of it to the point that it no longer meets the criteria. I've added several "Better source" tags, which have been removed by another editor, and now added back by myself. Kali is the only article this editor has ever edited, so they don't have a lot of experience — I've given them some links to learn more about sourcing. I won't be able to edit much for a couple of weeks, but perhaps some others would be interested in improving what is an important article. Regards, First Light (talk) 10:11, 31 May 2016 (UTC)