Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Micronesia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

WikiProject X is live![edit]

WikiProject X icon.svg

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Federated States of Micronesia listed at Requested moves[edit]

Information.svg

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Federated States of Micronesia to be moved to Micronesia. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 01:44, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

"Nanyo (Japanese mandated territory)" or "South Pacific Mandate"[edit]

"Nanyo (Japanese mandated territory)" or "South Pacific Mandate"? There is a discussion at Talk:Nanyo (Japanese mandated territory)#Requested move 19 October 2015 --Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 04:31, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Article alerts added[edit]

I have just added an alerts section to this wikiproject. Any page which has this w-project banner on the talk page will automatically show up when it is nominated for deletion/ good article/ etc. Any feedback would be appreciated. Ottawahitech (talk) 21:31, 12 August 2016 (UTC)please ping me

Upcoming "420 collaboration"[edit]

Cannabis leaf 2.svg

You are invited to participate in the upcoming

"420 collaboration",

which is being held from Saturday, April 15 to Sunday, April 30, and especially on April 20, 2017!

The purpose of the collaboration, which is being organized by WikiProject Cannabis, is to create and improve cannabis-related content at Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects in a variety of fields, including: culture, health, hemp, history, medicine, politics, and religion.


For more information about this campaign, and to learn how you can help improve Wikipedia, please visit the "420 collaboration" page.

---Another Believer (Talk) 22:04, 10 April 2017 (UTC)


May 2017 on Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red logo.svg

Welcome to Women in Red's
May 2017 worldwide online editathons.
Participation is welcome in any language.

Adath Jeshurun Women's League costume party, Minneapolis (4419484936).jpg
Test cricket - women - 1935.jpg
Pacific Basin Human Geography Cultural Zones.jpg



(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Ipigott (talk) 10:50, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion for Category:I-Kiribati sportspeople stubs[edit]

Dawynn (talk) 13:56, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Runit dome article: Logic error?[edit]

Hi.

I just fixed some errors in the Runit island article page [[1]] about the dome and was wondering about the following sentence: "Concern primarily lays in the rapid tidal response to the height of the water beneath the dome, with the potential for contamination of the ground-water supply with radionuclides." But if the ground water has any potential to get contaminated with radionuclides, it should have already been contaminated with salt water. (Or will, in that case) I don't think the radioactive particles would have any impact at all in this situation, except maybe for bacteria living in the ground water. (You're/They're drinking it, I guess. So I hope there no harmful bacteria in it. :)

I know there is the (possibly) upcoming issue of contamination with sea water for all the isles ground water supplies. But in that case any liveform in it will probably die and get exchanged for sea life - which is already slightly contaminated.

Does anyone have an idea how to put that into a sentence for the article?

Sincerely

(I guess I should make an account...) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8108:88C0:3E8:884A:C450:2B26:1F07 (talk) 13:36, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Category:Governors of Nanyo listed at Categories for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

I have asked for a discussion to look at the possibility of moving the category Category:Governors of Nanyo to Category:Governors of the South Pacific Mandate. Would anyone here be interested in offering their opinion at the move discussion? - Polly Tunnel (talk) 11:28, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject[edit]

The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

Portals are being redesigned.

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template {{Transclude lead excerpt}}.

The discussion about this can be found here.

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.

Background[edit]

On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.

There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

So far, 84 editors have joined.

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.

Thank you.    — The Transhumanist   07:48, 30 May 2018 (UTC)