Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Football League/Tampa Bay Buccaneers subproject

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject National Football League (Rated Project-class)
WikiProject icon This page is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Project  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 
WikiProject Tampa Bay Buccaneers (Rated Project-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon This page is within the scope of WikiProject Tampa Bay Buccaneers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and the National Football League on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Project  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 Top  This page has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

WP 1.0 bot announcement[edit]

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 04:00, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

To Do List: Game Summaries[edit]

I have added game summaries for 82-84, and am about to get set on 1985, and then I'll work ahead from 1988-on. I'll take a look at some of the articles rated "high importance" but still rated at "stub" or "start" class. Leeman Bennett jumps out as one that needs attention. Dementia13 (talk) 17:53, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

I GAN'ed Hugh Culverhouse; it was rated "top importance", but was still at "start-class". Dementia13 (talk) 02:22, 16 August 2010 (UTC)