Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional sound production

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Professional sound production (Rated NA-class)
WikiProject icon This page is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 NA  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 

Gain listed at Requested moves[edit]

Information.svg

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Gain to be moved to Gain (electronics). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 20:14, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Sawmills Studio, Cornwall[edit]

Hi There, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.139.213.174 (talk) 20:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

CobraNet RfC[edit]

Please contribute your thoughts on a dispute regarding inclusion of a list of licensed manufacturers in the CobraNet article. ~Kvng (talk) 04:56, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Audacity (audio editor) listed at Requested moves[edit]

Information.svg

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Audacity (audio editor) to be moved to Audacity. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 12:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

My Ears![edit]

The Wikipedia Page for "White Noise", and possibly the pages for brown noise and gaussian noise and so fourth, has an absolutely pain inducing sample. Do not check the sample yourself, it may be actually dangerous to hear at high volume. Thispagehasathing (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:13, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

My Ears! (Clarification)[edit]

I cannot add to the "Talk" Page for "White Noise"/ other pages. More importantly, I cant remove that sample. Please remove this sample if you can, and check the samples of the other types of noise - even at low volume its painfully loud. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thispagehasathing (talkcontribs) 02:18, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Monaural symbol?[edit]

The Monaural article has an image at the top which is uncaptioned. It was first added in 2006 and captioned then as "Label for 1.0 sound, mono." The Quadraphonic sound article has a similar image. Are these indeed standard labels, and if so where does one typically see them? 24.7.14.87 (talk) 03:54, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

I'm not aware of any industry standard for these speaker-placement diagrams. There are standards for the placement of speakers themselves. ~Kvng (talk) 14:11, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement![edit]

Today's Article For Improvement star.svg

Hello,
Please note that Professional audio, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of Today's articles for improvement. The article was scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing!
Delivered by MusikBot talk 00:07, 9 January 2017 (UTC) on behalf of the TAFI team

Loudest sounds[edit]

There are currently discussions at RfD for the redirect Loudest man-made sound on Earth at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 January 13#Loudest man-made sound on Earth where input from editors knowledgeable about loudness and related concepts would be most welcome. Thryduulf (talk) 21:02, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Website link[edit]

Hi,

In the "Production music" page I added a link to a website dedicated to one library music composer. But it has been removed, considering it as "inappropriate". Why? It's non commercial and anyone being interested in production music can get there information never seen anywhere else: it's about De Wolfe, Chappell, In-editions... So to me it's a way to go further in the subject.

Best regards, Croquetout — Preceding unsigned comment added by Croquetout (talkcontribs) 00:16, 7 May 2017 (UTC)