Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Sexology and sexuality
(Click here for project talk page)
  Resources & templates   Sex work task force
(Click here for task force talk page)

Project talk page

edit·history·watch·refresh Stock post message.svg To-do list for WikiProject Sexology and sexuality:

Not in Front of the Children - at Peer Review[edit]

I've requested Peer Review for Not in Front of the Children.

Feedback would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Peer review/Not in Front of the Children/archive1.

Thank you,

Cirt (talk) 06:03, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Epigenetic theories of homosexuality article[edit]

Opinions are needed on the following matter: Talk:Epigenetic theories of homosexuality#What about Epigenetic theories of heterosexuality ?. It concerns the lack of a heterosexual comparison, what to title the article, and the fact that better sources should be used for the biomedical information (unless there is a WP:MEDDATE aspect preventing better sources). See this comment I made. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 06:33, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Sexuality after spinal cord injury at Peer Review[edit]

I've requested Peer Review for Sexuality after spinal cord injury in hopes of getting it ready for an eventual FAC. If anyone can spare the time I'd love to get any feedback at Wikipedia:Peer review/Sexuality after spinal cord injury/archive1.

Thank you! delldot ∇. 21:27, 21 November 2015 (UTC)


Hey guys, the article for Courtship disorder was nominated for deletion. I completed the nom despite thinking that the topic looks to be notable enough for an entry, but I note that the nominator also said that the article was biased. I'm not familiar enough with the topic to know if it is or isn't, hence why I'm posting here. Can one of you take a look? I don't see anything that particularly stands out offhand, but I figured I'd ask. I'm also going to cut/paste this to another WP. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:27, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Party and play[edit]

The topic of party and play a.k.a. chemsex seems to be in the news at the moment. However, our current article on it is both out of date and poorly sourced. Would anyone else like to help with bringing it up to date? -- The Anome (talk) 17:00, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

AfC submission[edit]

See Draft:MGTOW. Thank you, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 00:56, 15 December 2015 (UTC)


The usage and purpose of MGTOW is under discussion, see talk:MGTOW -- (talk) 06:20, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

It is also being discussed at Talk:Men Going Their Own Way -- (talk) 05:26, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Sexuality after spinal cord injury at FAC[edit]

I have nominated Sexuality after spinal cord injury for Featured article status. If you have time I hope you'll take a look and let me know what you think at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Sexuality after spinal cord injury/archive1. Thank you! delldot ∇. 20:39, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Shouldn't the penises in Wikipedia be of representative size?[edit]

I just noticed that I've overlooked how big the size of the male genitals are in anal sex. Shouldn't the representative picture of a major kind of sex be average sized? Especially for anal sex? (poor girl). Porn sites distort peoples' judgement of what the average size of a penis is, there's no need to further this. I don't feel like doing an analysis of the penis size of every article with a penis but fellatio also has this problem (plus that the woman is fellating a penis that she can barely cram past her lips makes her look like a whore (though her face helps), she could be licking the outside while rubbing it instead). Does the penis-width to lip-width ratio of the drawing have to be so high that it's degrading to the woman? I'm sure that average instance of fellatio in real life is not "can barely fit in the mouth". Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 19:20, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Sexuality after spinal cord injury needs reviewers at FAC[edit]

Hey all, Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Sexuality after spinal cord injury/archive1 is getting elderly. It has gotten very little input and I'm starting to get anxious that it'll get archived for lack of attention. If you have time I'd love it if you could let me know what you think! Thanks! delldot ∇. 02:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)