Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Skepticism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


RfC at VPP on reform of FTN and FRINGE

[edit]

Proposed merge of Pharyngula (blog) into PZ Myers

[edit]

Please see the discussion at Talk:PZ_Myers#Proposed_merge_of_Pharyngula_(blog)_into_PZ_Myers. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 21:27, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

icon

Talk:Scientology, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Chess enjoyer (talk) 00:35, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RFC at Andrew Huberman

[edit]

Talk:Andrew Huberman#RfC: Lead of Andrew Huberman DolyaIskrina (talk) 13:57, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks Dolyaalskrina, I'll check it out. Sgerbic (talk) 17:04, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Archaeoraptor

[edit]

Archaeoraptor has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:24, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for QAnon

[edit]

QAnon has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:43, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've submitted 2024 United States drone sightings as a featured article candidate. The subject - mass reports of "mysterious drones", official debunking, and lingering speculation - aligns well with this project's focus on critical analysis of extraordinary claims.

The nomination discussion has unfortunately stalled, and I would appreciate more reviewers or fresh eyes on it to help move the process forward. Feedback is welcome on the nomination page. Thank you! Anne drew (talk · contribs) 01:22, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ANI: Cambial Yellowing on Scientology

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding the derailing of content discussions. The thread is Cambial Yellowing on Scientology. The discussion is about the topic Scientology.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 21:45, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Flight 19

[edit]

Flight 19 has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:46, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about WikiProject banner templates

[edit]

For WikiProjects that participate in rating articles, the banners for talk pages usually say something like:

There is a proposal to change the default wording on the banners to say "priority" instead of "importance". This could affect the template for your group. Please join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council#Proposal to update wording on WikiProject banners. Stefen 𝕋ower HuddleHandiwerk 19:49, 6 December 2025 (UTC) (on behalf of the WikiProject Council)[reply]