Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Square Enix

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to the discussion page. This page provides space for community members to discuss housekeeping, project and article issues. Click here to add an issue to the discussion below, or here to edit the page to respond to a specific issue.

The current month's archive is here.

Crystal Clear app file-manager.png
WPSE Archive index


Begging for a DYK review[edit]

Hey guys, I've been jammin on FFXIV: Heavensward for 8 months now and it's finally ready. I wouldn't normally do this, but I'd really appreciate a review at Template:Did you know nominations/Final Fantasy XIV: Heavensward. I know I just put it up but I'm hoping to catch the 3rd anniversary of FF14's release (8/27) so it's a bit time sensitive. I'm willing to QPQ anything you like in exchange. :) Also, if there's an admin in the house, I'm still waiting on a housekeeping move at Final Fantasy XIV: Heavensward. Axem Titanium (talk) 21:12, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Looking nice! Withing striking distance of GA, I think. I'll see if I can get to a DYK review tomorrow or Tuesday. --PresN 02:05, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks! I'd been cooking it in draft for entirely too long. I'm going to give the plot section another pass before doing a GA nom. Axem Titanium (talk) 19:08, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Tidus FA?[edit]

After making my first FA (from other project) I was wondering whether it was possible to bring Tidus to Featured Article status based on how it appears there is more out of universe than in-universe info. What should I ask for first, a peer review or a copyedit? Anybody could also help me? Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 23:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Peer review first- maybe do a copyedit edit pass yourself beforehand, but there's not much point polishing the prose only to rewrite chunks of it afterwards. I think it's definitely possible to do, though you'll want to see if there's information that you can find that's not used in the article yet; also, the reception section (like so many characters) falls prey a bit to the "lists of listicles" phenomenom- instead of talking in flowing prose about how some critics find him annoying, there's interjections like "He was also featured fifth in 1UP's "The Top 5 Most Irriating RPG Protagonists"". Though it's still a lot better than many character articles, especially the ones on "hot" female characters that read like a bullet list of every half-baked listicle they've ever placed 12th on. --PresN 01:38, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback as usual PresN. I tried rewriting some parts to avoid those "he was listed x by" and just using the prose.Tintor2 (talk) 16:11, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Update. I made the peer review Wikipedia:Peer review/Tidus/archive1 and also requested a copy-edit.Tintor2 (talk) 15:17, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Another update. Tidus' creation section uses this Flaregamer article. According to them, the original article was made in 2001 by Final Fantasy Online that has been archived. However, I can't seem to find Nomura's article about his works. Any idea? Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 02:10, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Not really sure what you mean? They say that the article was from FFO, but was never published there; they also mention a few sources (unlinked), which means that original Nomura interviews are from V-Jump and Famitsu interviews, or from the FFX Ultimania(s). Looking around, looks like there's some translations of bits of the FFX and FFX-2 ultimanias, including one that might be useful to you from FFX-2 by Ryu Kaze, one of the founders of this wikiproject, amusingly enough, with page numbers. I didn't look that hard, though; when I did the FF13 FA, I found actual scans in Japanese of some of the interviews in those books and manually transcribed+google translated them, so I still get flashbacks. --PresN 03:20, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
@PresN: I mean if it's okay to use Flaregamer in an article that I would like to become FA.Tintor2 (talk) 13:35, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Mmm, you might want to ask at WT:VG or WT:VG/RS; to be honest it might be hard to justify, as it appears to be just a multi-user blog (11 people) that post something a few times a year at most; no indication of fact-checking or editing. On the other hand, they do have interviews with people so...? --PresN 17:13, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. Already sent it there.Tintor2 (talk) 17:24, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Update. A copyeditor already finished editing the article while closed the peer review since even one commented did in my talk page. Do you guys think it's worth for FA material? I'm not entirely sure so I need answer or maybe a conominator. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 21:32, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Looks like you've gone ahead and done it, but I agree, not much else to do for it at this point but get more eyes on it. --PresN 15:48, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Another update It appears the nomination is going quite well. Could someone make a source review? Praise be to-- I mean regards.Tintor2 (talk) 21:43, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Another update A user already made the source review. Does the FAC need more attention or everything is going on well? Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 22:23, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

I'd say you don't have much to worry about now. Even if you don't get an outright support from GamerPro64, you've still got seven supports, plus an image and source review. I heard once that the mimimum number of supports needed is five plus image and source reviews. You're on a roll! --ProtoDrake (talk) 22:51, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Final update: It became a FA. Merry Christmas! The promoter said something a link, but I don't get it. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 20:06, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
@Tintor2: Congrats! He means that there are links that are repeated in the article- the same article linked multiple times. The script he linked can show you them. --PresN 21:05, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

GA/FA discussion regarding Final Fantasy XV[edit]

There is an important discussion regarding the possibility of making Final Fantasy XV a GA or an FA in the future. The discussion can be found at Talk:Final Fantasy XV#Possible GA/FA?. Input or suggestions from project members would be appreciated. Thanks, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:55, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Logo of Star Ocean[edit]

The logo used for Star Ocean: The Last Hope is used. However, later games use the different logo again, which was used for a few games prior to Last Hope. I found images of the logo. Does anyone have a photoshop application to create the logo without using backgrounds and subtitles? George Ho (talk) 19:20, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Nine Twelve GAs to majority GA or better[edit]

Incredible milestone approaching, thought I'd mention it. Also, smallest number of cleanup tags and articles we have ever recorded. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:30, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Long time no see. I hope the Flaregamer site is considered reliable so that I can nominate Tidus to FA after the copyedit.Tintor2 (talk) 23:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
It's good to be back! I was just working on life and my YouTube comedy channel, but I always come back. I nominated one Kingdom Hearts article for GA, keep things small and manageable. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 21:02, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Cleanup Campaign Part VI[edit]

The last Top level Importance articles with cleanup tags

Then the last B class articles with cleanup tags

Have at it!

Judgesurreal777 (talk) 21:41, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Images of Tales of Eternia at FFD[edit]

The FFD discussion has been ongoing for several months without closure. Though the games belong to Namco or Bandai Namco, I figure that you can treat the issue the same as the one with Final Fantasy games. I invite you to improve consensus there. --George Ho (talk) 04:19, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

2016 Community Wishlist Survey Proposal to Revive Popular Pages[edit]

Magic Wand Icon 229981 Color Flipped.svg

Greetings WikiProject Square Enix Members!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about a technical proposal to revive your Popular Pages list in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

If the above proposal gets in the Top 10 based on the votes, there is a high likelihood of this bot being restored so your project will again see monthly updates of popular pages.

Further, there are over 260 proposals in all to review and vote for, across many aspects of wikis.

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Best regards, SteviethemanDelivered: 18:08, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Characters of Chrono Cross Merger Discussion[edit]

Please chime in! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 18:59, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy Holidays![edit]

We would like to wish everyone on the project a very happy holiday season! Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:02, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy Christmas and New Year, and best wishes for everyone in 2017 and beyond! --ProtoDrake (talk) 09:40, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Happy Holidays, and here's to a good 2017! --PresN 20:36, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

FFVII possible FA push[edit]

Hi there. I'm wondering as, given that a huge new article has appeared on Polygon and it's the titles twentieth anniversary, there might be a collaborative effort between editors to bring this title to to FA standard, then return it to its rightful place. I must say here and now that starting from around mid-January I'll have very pressing real-world concerns that will bar me from extensive work on any part of Wikipedia until the beginning of February at the latest (not wikibreak strictly, just not much time to do long bouts of editing). I would be more than happy to take on the Synopsis (which needs trimming I think), Development and Release sections, and others can take on elements such as Gameplay and Reception. It's not a project for the immediate future, but at some point in the next month or two. Opinions? --ProtoDrake (talk) 23:05, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

I will try to help. However, I think the plot section is toó long and de could clean up the lead a little.Tintor2 (talk) 23:27, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Main discussion is now at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#FFVII possible FA push which is happily quite active. --PresN 15:26, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Merge discussion[edit]

There is currently a merge discussion at Talk:Characters of Final Fantasy X and X-2#Separation from main game articles. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 02:18, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Shintaro Takai[edit]

Any sources for this, or is it a candidate for merger/deletion? I am no longer watching this pageping if you'd like a response czar 08:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

@Czar: Did a sweep in both English and Japanese; can't find anything that counts for notability. A few mentions in interviews by other people in projects he worked on, and an interview with him about a game he was developing, but nothing actually about him beyond confirmation of him being credited for several games. Which isn't enough. --PresN 12:15, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Final Fantasy XV characters[edit]

A user recently created the article Gladiolus Amicitia but it seems to be lacking out-of-universe information in comparison to Noctis' article. By the way, Noctis' article lacks information about his role in FFXV. Since I don't have a PS4, I sadly can't expand it but I'm pretty sure Noctis could become a GA once his role in FFXV is added. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 16:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

@Tintor2: I've done work on Noctis' article. And I've got a feeling Gladio's article will be merged back into the main Characters article at some point.
This article isn't bad. However, years ago we reached consensus regarding the balanced, encyclopedic coverage of Final Fantasy characters on Wikipedia, and this character just doesn't cut it. He is not the main protagonist, and his notability has not extended beyond the work in which he appeared. Policies may have been changed in recent times (for which I wasn't around) but a fair and comprehensive merge still seems like the logical choice here. —Deckiller (t-c-l) 10:57, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Proud[edit]

This WikiProject has never faltered. The work continues and is just as strong as it once was. You guys are incredible!

I started piggybacking on the FA push for Final Fantasy VII; this article is particularly comprehensive now, mostly thanks to team diligence and a ton of new sources (interviews in particular). It's almost too much of a good thing; we'll have to trim some of that! I think the plot section is about as succinct as it can be, and the gameplay section reads a little better now than it did way back in the day. Technical writing can be very challenging in an encyclopedic register, as we always see with these rather elusive Gameplay sections; they're always the ones that are constantly rewritten.

We should also add a few tidbits regarding retrospective opinions—e.g. timeless story/gameplay, dated graphics/audio font, the archaic translation—which brings up a point I think we need to consider. Final Fantasy is one of the oldest video game franchises, and a ton of VG sources are giving other games the same treatment as FF7 by releasing retrospective reviews, analyses, and interviews. With the HD Remake coming for FF12 later this year, and Square in a constant state of nostalgia these days, it leaves the question: do we need to add a consistent "retrospective" sub-section to the Reception sections of older Final Fantasies? I think it's important for the sake of encyclopedic coverage to frame these classics in a more modern context. —Deckiller (t-c-l) 10:39, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Talking about Final Fantasy, I'm surprised the article Terra Branford hasn't been nominated to GA considering it has a good amount of real world information. Same with Noctis Lucis Caelum (who could even be a FA) whereas Gladios' article might end being merged with the character list.Tintor2 (talk) 16:55, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Final Fantasy XV[edit]

Hey everyone. Just wanted to let you know that Final Fantasy XV has an expired retention period for the Wikipedia:Featured topics/Final Fantasy series topic. Will be taking it to FTRC unless someone will be taking it for GAN. Also, the retention period for Music of Final Fantasy XV involving Wikipedia:Featured topics/Music of the Final Fantasy series will expire on March 13th. GamerPro64 19:02, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

FTRC now up here. @ProtoDrake: you were working on these; I see that you just nominated the music article for GAN, were you planning on doing FFXV as well? Looks like it's missing a reception section is the main thing. --PresN 16:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
@PresN:, no I wasn't going to do the main article as my own project. I'm happy to help, but I'm a bit XV-ed out. I'm doing the music article as that's something of an emergency and requires minimal work, and when there's less upcoming content down the line, I'll get the development article out there. I think there might also be the need for a seperate list article of sorts, like with the Mass Effect 2 and 3 DLC. As to the Characters article, that's also something for a future time as it's been expanded in a rather haphazard fashion and may require a complete rewrite. Kingsglaive is also fairly easy, but I'm not feeling like handling that one either. --ProtoDrake (talk) 16:28, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Gladiolus Amicitia merger[edit]

Gladiolus AmicitiaCharacters of Final Fantasy XV (discuss) --The1337gamer (talk) 09:07, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

FFVII now FAC[edit]

After looking through the article, I've taken the step. Final Fantasy VII has been nominated as an FAC, potentially culminating a colossal collaborative effort to bring the article back from the brink. Anyone who wants to leave comments and either support or oppose this nomination, please do so. To have this article FA before the end of the year would be the ideal ending to this project. --ProtoDrake (talk) 17:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Aerith and Sephiroth's themes[edit]

Shouldn't the musical sections of the characters of Aerith and Sephiroth be simply moved to Music of Final Fantasy VII? By the way, Polygon shared the making of Sephiroth's theme. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 14:59, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Is this notable[edit]

Some years ago, a lot of manga authors from Shueisha did their takes of the Final Fantasy protagonists. Apparently, it was before XIII was released considering they didn't do it. I found it here. Do you guys find it notable to include in the characters' articles? I can't find the original source though. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 17:37, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

I don't think so; it's basically just fanart that happens to have been done by professionals, and non-free besides. The character articles are pretty full up on the official concept art/game art as it is, so it'd be hard to justify adding non-free non-official fanart versions, no matter the quality. --PresN 18:47, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
I didn't think about uploading the images but just mention them.Tintor2 (talk) 18:56, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Popular pages report[edit]

We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Square Enix/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Square Enix.

We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:

  • The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
  • The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
  • The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).

We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Square Enix, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.

Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

VII Victory Pose In Order![edit]

@TarkusAB, GamerPro64, Masem, Tintor2, Jaguar, Sergecross73, Deckiller, and Brayden96: After all these weeks/months of dedicated work, it's happened! Final Fantasy VII has been officially promoted to a Featured Article! *FFVII Victory Fanfare* I think we can all pat ourselves on the back for bringing this project to this point in one of the best collaborative efforts I've seen for any video game article to date. --ProtoDrake (talk) 19:10, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Congratulations! --PresN 01:04, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Great job everybody! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:30, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Heads up[edit]

Tidus will be featured in Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 22, 2017. Thanks to all the users who helped me to make it FA. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 20:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

And it has been published! I'll take a pic of it.Tintor2 (talk) 01:03, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Also, it has been vandalized twice so please keep in mind.Tintor2 (talk) 01:06, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
New discussion Talk:Tidus#Why the...?.Tintor2 (talk) 01:08, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Drive to Majority FA/FL/GA - 5 Left![edit]

Hello, it’s Judgesurreal777 back again, and I think it would be a great time to get the last Good articles we need to become the first major wikiproject ever to have a majority of certified quality content! Here are my thoughts on potential candidates:

Here are also some other B class articles in a high level of completion:

We Are so Super Close to Making History, Let’s do it! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 00:56, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

I made Characters of the Final Fantasy IV series some years ago but I still detect a bit of cruft (still, I never got to play IV's sequel so I have no idea about it).Tintor2 (talk) 20:56, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
I spent some time finishing up the sections of Heavensward I had left unwritten because it wasn't out yet. I believe it is content-complete and needs another set of eyes on the prose before going to GAN. In particular, I think the Plot section is long, but also the story in an MMO is just friggin' long, so I'd like opinions on what stuff can be cut, elided, or simplified while still being understandable. I already neglected to mention a good number of characters completely so I hope it still makes sense. Axem Titanium (talk) 02:38, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Kingdom Hearts III discussion[edit]

There is an ongoing discussion in Talk:Kingdom Hearts III#Why is the distribution credit for DCPI removed? in regards to the credits. Please join in to reach an agreement. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 15:53, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Final Fantasy Ultimania books[edit]

It appears the Final Fantasy Ultimania books will be officially released in Europe based on article I found in Neogaf. Considering they tend to too much creation, it might be useful to articles like Squall and Zidane (at least the image I saw the artwork of Cloud, Squall and Zidane by Amano). Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 20:38, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Official source for clarity. First part Final Fantasy Ultimania Archive Volume 1 is available from 5 June 2018, covering Final Fantasy to Final Fantasy VI. Also, please let's not get carried away adding info just because the Ultimanias are being translated into English. --ProtoDrake (talk) 20:51, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
The cover and divisions make it look like it's going to be English translations of Final Fantasy 25th Memorial Ultimania Volume 1/2/3 (Translated Ultimania site for original book), which should be good. Will add to List of Square Enix companion books. --PresN 21:33, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
I preordered the US version so feel free to ask me for scans. Axem Titanium (talk) 15:25, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Listing Cloud Strife and Aerith Gainsborough at the Star-crossed article[edit]

Hi, all. Opinions are needed on the following matter: Talk:Star-crossed#TheJaff's repeated deletion of Cloud/Aerith. A permalink for it is here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:21, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Squall image[edit]

Considering the FFVIII image of Squall Leonhart only shows his face, I uploaded Nomura's design of Dissidia since it has a shot of his entire body as well as the Gunblade sword discussed in the creation section. Still, I don't know if the quality of the image is good so feel free to change it if you want. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 23:55, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Final Fantasy VII: An Oral History - Book[edit]

Remember that massive feature Polygon came out with last January about Final Fantasy VII? Tons of interviews, illustrations, etc? Well, they've licensed it off to Read-Only Memory to turn into a book, with a few added interviews and new artwork. ROM has launched a kickstarter for it, by which I mean that it's well passed the goal already, 3 days in. It's due in May 2018; I'm getting a copy, so whenever it appears I'll make a post about the interviews that are book-only. Just thought others might be interested as well. --PresN 20:31, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

I wonder if it has a recollection on how exactly they created Cloud. The article comments how Cloud was carefully designed to the game's protagonist but the source might not be reliable.Tintor2 (talk) 21:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Riku[edit]

There is currently a discussion in Talk:Riku (Kingdom Hearts Character)#Expansion on the article in regards to the fact the article was briefly created. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 10:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Back in the game[edit]

Just trimmed up the plot sections of FF6 and FF7 (and FF8 to a small extent). It's amazing how long the sections were 10 years ago: and we thought we were being succinct at the time! —Deckiller (t-c-l) 23:09, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

@Deckiller: Welcome back! --PresN 02:13, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

A little of help with Vaan[edit]

I'm not a fan of the XII series, but I was "triggered" to expand the articles of Vaan and Balthier. I found this interview with Vaan's English actor but I have a problem. Since English is not my first language my listening is not very, especially with how weird Edner sounds in the article. Could anybody add something about from the interview to the article? Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 19:34, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Ivalice update[edit]

Just letting people know. The game Final Fantasy Tactics A2: Grimoire of the Rift is now a GA. That means the only Ivalice-related title not to be GA or higher is Crystal Defenders, which I've expanded as much as possible but don't actually feel like taking the rest of the way. If anyone wants to, they can take on that article. Then it'll be a short step to perhaps an Ivalice Good Topic. It'll certainly be a step forward for the SQEX project as a whole. --ProtoDrake (talk) 14:48, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Hmm, you've got it pretty much there; I'll try to take a pass at it to get it bumped to GA if no one else jumps on it. --PresN 15:11, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
I found some screenshots for this game series before I made an account. I found this webpage that has a screenshot of Crystal Guardians W1 [1] and this one for Vanguard Storm [2]. I don't know which one is more beneficial for Crystal Guardians/Defenders. the most oldest or the newest. The most recent is Crystal Defenders Plus, and I could demo it and get a screenshot however don't know how to upload them to wikipediaBlue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 18:41, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Final Fantasy series at FTC... again[edit]

Since ProtoDrake got Final Fantasy XV to GA as of today, I've gone ahead and re-re-nominated the Final Fantasy series topic at WP:FTC, marking it's 7th appearance on that page in various forms. --PresN 18:02, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Cloud's height[edit]

While trying to expand Cloud Strife, I noted that for reason his height is listed. Is it that important? Also, while there is a lot of information about Takahiro Sakurai (Japanese voice actor) I can't find too much about his English. Also, shouldn't the reception section be rearranged to make it look more like Lightning or Tidus? I see some sources that don't seem necessary. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 20:51, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

I managed to find more creation information of Cloud but I don't know how to divide it since the new one is about the remake. Still, are you guys interested in turning it into a FA? There is too much time until Square releases the remake. Still, I think the reception section needs a bit of clean up while the prose might need some check. What do you think @ProtoDrake:, @PresN:?Tintor2 (talk) 00:26, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
It seems alright. Yes, the reception section need some cleaning-up. Also, the references probably need some additional work such as archiving. Also... I really don't think height is necessary. It wasn't for Lightning for GA or FA. In fact, that's one of the points that needed addressing before a pass. --ProtoDrake (talk) 11:15, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Rearranged the reception section and worked on the quote video game section. Still, I wonder if the section "In Final Fantasy VII" might need trimming considering how big it is.Tintor2 (talk) 16:46, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
I agree that the height shouldn't be included. That's the sort of little fictional detail I'd typically remove from an article, unless it's somehow really important to understanding the character. (ie character is 8 foot tall and ridiculed throughout the game for it or something.) Sergecross73 msg me 19:54, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
@Sergecross73: @ProtoDrake: Trimmed the FFVII section a bit more and rearranged more the reception section. I also found how Steve Burton was selected to voice the character.Tintor2 (talk) 22:26, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Do you guys think I should request for a copyedit already or does somebody want to work furthermore?Tintor2 (talk) 16:25, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
BTW, I heard a guidebook titled The Legend of Final Fantasy VII has been released in English regions. Maybe that book might help some of the VII articles, especially Cloud.Tintor2 (talk) 01:17, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Dissidia (series) page?[edit]

Should there be a page for Dissidia as a spin-off series? There are a total of 4 games (5 if you consider Dissidia arcade and Dissidia NT separate games). All the games are really well done too.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 15:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

@Blue Pumpkin Pie: There's enough games for one, sure, but you'd need to find a few sources that talk about the series as a whole, otherwise you'd just be summarizing the existing articles and sticking those summaries together. --PresN 01:43, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Oh ok. makes sense.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 13:05, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Discussion about the recent changes to Template:Final Fantasy series[edit]

There's an ongoing discussion about the recent changes to the main FF template here and your feedback is requested. Axem Titanium (talk) 01:44, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

PresN has proposed a new format for the navbox, previewed below. Please discuss at the template talk page. Axem Titanium (talk) 21:38, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Something about Tidus and Yuna[edit]

As many as you know, Nomura made new designs for the two FFX characters that was presented in a museum to celebrate the anniversary of the franchise. Do you think it's worth needed to include or we should only post it if it's a free image?

By the way, an anon requested for an edit here. I think he might be right. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 15:20, 7 April 2018 (UTC)