This page is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the page attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
To my knowledge, Gene Roddenberry had decided to de-canonize TAS because he was unhappy with the way it turned-out. I read that at the Star Trek canon article. Since its another WP article and has been cited as sourced, I am, not sure if that qualifies as original research or not. Xerobane 08:54, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Where are the other books by Marc Okrand classified - apart from The Klingon Dictionary which can be found in the Canon: Reference guides section. I especially mean The Klingon Way, Klingon for the Galactic Traveller, and similar books by other authors, e.g. Lengends of the Ferengi. Are they Canon or Non-Canon? They are neither novels nor comics, their type are not mentioned anywhere. I would like to draw your attention to the fact that I have written an article on The Klingon Way and it was immediately contested by certain Users and marked for deletion. The discussion is goming on. noychoH (talk) 21:50, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Paramount has official statements about what is and what is not canon. Not sure why this page has any ambiguity in it at all. Not sure why there is a "semi-canon" section - there is no such thing other than people's desires (POV) to elevate it to such status. StarHOG (Talk) 13:20, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
