Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Websites
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Websites page.
|Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6|
|WikiProject Websites / Computing||(Rated Project-class)|
Nomination of List of YouTubers for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of YouTubers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Oliverrushton (talk) 17:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
A proposal to merge duplicate articles TheMuse and The Muse together is up for discussion. To participate, see the open discussion at talk:The Daily Muse -- 18.104.22.168 (talk) 22:43, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Popular pages report
We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Websites/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Websites.
We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:
- The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
- The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
- The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).
We're grateful to m:User talk:Community Tech bot.for his original , and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Websites, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at
Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
It's not an important article, and it looks fairly similar to a stub, but the Quatloos.com article now reflects the entirety of RS mentions for Quatloos!. It'll never be a GA, just because it's lacking some basics (even if I forced a Lead into the article, I'd need to replicate almost the entire body to satisfy the Lead length requirements). However, I'd suggest that it's now "well organized and essentially complete", so should be bumped up to an A grade.
I've also asked WikiProject California to review their grade. If you're happy to follow their recommendation on the rating, please say: it might be a waste of time to have two reviews by WikiProjects. Cheers, Bromley86 (talk) 00:16, 24 May 2017 (UTC)