Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women's History
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Women's History page.
|Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10|
|WikiProject Women||(Rated Project-class)|
|WikiProject Women's History||(Rated Project-class)|
|This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot II. Any threads with no replies in 90 days may be automatically moved. Sections without timestamps are not archived.|
|This WikiProject was featured on the WikiProject report at the Signpost on 12 March 2012.|
- 1 November editathons from Women in Red: Join us!
- 2 Cento vergilianus de laudibus Christi FAN
- 3 Article alert
- 4 WiR December highlights
- 5 Fatimah listed at Requested moves
- 6 Disambiguation links on pages tagged by this wikiproject
- 7 Talk:Josephine Butler
- 8 BBC 100 Women
- 9 New Year's resolution: Write more articles for Women in Red!
- 10 Revisiting gendered categories
- 11 Gloria Richardson
- 12 Merge proposal
- 13 "Carolina Oliphant, Lady Nairne", by any other name
November editathons from Women in Red: Join us!
Women in Red's November 2017 worldwide online editathons.
Cento vergilianus de laudibus Christi FAN
A month or so ago, I nominated the Latin poem Cento vergilianus de laudibus Christi at FAN. The work is unique and pertinent to this project for a number of reasons, namely that it might be the first Christian poem written by a women, as well as the the first work by a women to have been printed and disseminated via the printing press. If anyone would be so kind as to drop by the candidate page and offering some comments/suggestions, I'd greatly appreciate it!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 16:12, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
WiR December highlights
Women in Red's December 2017 worldwide online editathons.
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Fatimah to be moved to . This page is of interest to this WikiProject, and interested members may wish to participate in the discussion here. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 15:43, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia has many thousands of wikilinks which point to disambiguation pages. It would be useful to readers if these links directed them to the specific pages of interest, rather than making them search through a list. Members of WikiProject Disambiguation have been working on this and the total number is now below 20,000 for the first time. Some of these links require specialist knowledge of the topics concerned and therefore it would be great if you could help in your area of expertise.
A list of the relevant links on pages which fall within the remit of this wikiproject can be found at http://22.214.171.124/~dispenser/cgi-bin/topic_points.py?banner=WikiProject_Women%27s_History
You are invited to comment at Talk:Josephine Butler#Request for comment on names where there's an issue about naming; the article (which is currently a FA) refers to its female subject by her first name throughout "for simplicity". Any input is welcome.--John (talk) 18:26, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
BBC 100 Women
I've started a discussion on Wikipedia talk:Notability_(people)#BBC_100_Women on whether the women listed on this program are inherently notable. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:26, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
New Year's resolution: Write more articles for Women in Red!
Women in Red's January 2018 worldwide online editathons.
Revisiting gendered categories
Wikipedia talk:Categorization#Revisiting gendered categories: Let's have a clear criterion of "has or can have a proper article" --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:21, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
- It is not a !voting proposal or RfC, but a discussion draft, and has already had some constructive feedback (e.g. leading with "ghettoization" of articles was a distraction, as were suggesting statistical differences and reasons for them without providing sources). Seeking input on the overall idea. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ< 02:28, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
It has been proposed that Timeline of feminism be merged into Timeline of second-wave feminism. Seeking your feedback at Talk:Timeline of feminism#Merge discussion. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 11:51, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
"Carolina Oliphant, Lady Nairne", by any other name
I've started a Request for Comment on Talk:Carolina Nairne#Request for comment on how to refer to the article subject: How should the article refer to its subject, Carolina Oliphant, Lady Nairne, after the initial mention of her full name? --GRuban (talk) 18:06, 17 January 2018 (UTC)