Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is an MMORPG
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wikipedia is an MMORPG page.
|This page is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
- 1 Moving the article
- 2 Title?
- 3 This is absolutely stupid
- 4 It's good
- 5 What about...
- 6 Wikiholism?
- 7 Wikipedia is like an MMORPG, but Wikipedia is not an MMORPG
- 8 Too many brackets
- 9 Only free MMO?
- 10 Most useful page ever
- 11 How you know you're a n00b
- 12 I agree Wikipedia IS AN MMORPG
- 13 WoWiki
- 14 Social - tavern?
- 15 Intresting
- 16 That this article was not deleted, shows that the premise is actually correct
- 17 Stewards
- 18 Oversight/Revdelete
- 19 IP block exemption
- 20 New logo
- 21 New section
- 22 Checkusers
- 23 Just sayin'
- 24 Wow
- 25 Non-humorous counterpart to this essay
- 26 Hey, what about the rules?
- 27 Inconsistency
- 28 LMAO!
- 29 Comment
- 30 A question about content
Moving the article
I like it, insightful enough for me to not VfD it even though it doesn't really belong. --Alex Krupp 23:38, Oct 3, 2004 (UTC)
- You're right, it doesn't belong in the "Wikipedia:" namespace. I've moved it to meta. Lowellian 20:06, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- By the way, I did not just move the article here; I was the original author of this article. :) —Lowellian (talk) 05:48, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, but by moving it to meta, you did not change any of the article itself. Thus it makes no mention of the other sister projects. (no meta account--Wikipedia user HereToHelp) 18:56, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Read the above discussion more carefully. There is no need for a move to Meta, as even a deletion discussion resulted in a snowball keep. —Lowellian (reply) 17:59, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Shouldn't the title be "Wikipedia is a MMORPG" instead of "an MMORPG?" Massive doesn't actually begin with a vowel or a vowel sound. cookie 19:25, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- "Massive" may not begin with a vowel sound, but "MMORPG" does: "M" is "em". —Lowellian (talk) 05:43, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
This is absolutely stupid
Wikipedia is no more a MMORPG than Congress is. Articles are magic items? Whoever wrote this has absolutely no idea what even constitutes a "game".
Wikipedia is an online library that essentially allows anyone to add a book to it about just about anything. That isn't a game. And neither is 'edit wars' a game. Thats just griefing, and its been around much longer than the internet has. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 22.214.171.124 (talk • contribs) 05:08, June 23, 2006 (UTC)
- What does this article/opinion has to do with Meta anyway? NielsF 01:54, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Can't people ever see these types of articles are JOKES? Sheesh.126.96.36.199 01:05, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Perhaps we should make a big banner at the top of the page with flashing text reading "THIS IS HUMOROUS. LAUGH!" People don't really know if this is serious, because they don't see the Category:Humor at the bottom. Nishkid64 01:52, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- There is the humor template now.Orthologist
Stop making Wikipedia jokes, they aren't funny.... TheFireFox 17:21, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- They are too funny! And I guess someone decided to note that this page is humorous now...Chenhsi (talk) 01:35, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- it wouldn't be funny if it wasn't half true. --Ludwigs2 22:54, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
This page is extremely well written and innovative, but misses a point or two. It doesn't mention that "players" belong in "classes" (sysops, bureaucrats, etc.) and "races" (POV hunters, WikiGnomes, Wikifairies etc.). --Orthologist 20:57, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- I like this page too. I think it's quite an apt observation.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 14:40, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
The um... Cabal? Wait... There isn't one... <Shifty eyes> Yes... Let's go with that... Alx xlA 02:59, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Hey i loved this article. I just wanted an explanation of how this fits in the Wikipediholism spectrum. J-stan 17:11, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- Many editors are addicted to editing Wikipedia in the same way that many MMORPG players are addicted to playing their MMORPG accounts. —Lowellian (reply) 13:08, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia is like an MMORPG, but Wikipedia is not an MMORPG
- Fighting vandalism may be like trying to slay a dragon with an infinite capacity to grow new heads and breathe fire, but it's important that editors (and especially admins) derstand that WP is not a game and do not treat it as such.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 14:39, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Too many brackets
I think the humor of this essay is being distracted with the large number of terms in brackets. If no one disagrees, I will go ahead and incorporate their contents into wikilinks to the respective words.--Alasdair 16:36, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- You mean parentheses, not brackets, right? Anyway, I disagree. Those brackets make it easy to read the article and what each Wikipedia term corresponds to in an MMORPG. —Lowellian (reply) 05:51, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Only free MMO?
Theoretically, aren't there several other free MMO's?
- yes! Bam123456789 Please Talk!! 20:38, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- Most supposedly "free" MMORPGs still have things like ads or the option for paid accounts that unlock more options. In the case of Guild Wars, you have to buy the game in the first place even though it doesn't have subscription fees. That said, I agree that Wikipedia is not the only free MMORPG in the world. —Lowellian (reply) 13:05, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- True there are no ads and there are no fees, but you do have to train your character long and hard to level up to Game Master status. Kytti khat (talk) 23:21, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Most useful page ever
How you know you're a n00b
I agree Wikipedia IS AN MMORPG
Social - tavern?
In the WP:Wikipedia is an MMORPG#Social section, it is suggesting that we have over 5.48 million taverns. Now, that's an interesting, if expensive, prospect, but I was wondering if perhaps "balconies" might be a better fit? With the villagepumps as more obvious contenders for the title of our 5 main "taverns"... -- Quiddity (talk) 07:04, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
That this article was not deleted, shows that the premise is actually correct
so much for running an encyclopedia. This is just a giant space for jerking off by little Nacny boys, who should do sports. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 02:56, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
- This is not an article. It is a humor essay, in projectspace. It is only intended for the amusement/insight of other editors (or curious browsers). Hence no articles link to it. -- Quiddity (talk) 05:30, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
- damn, and I was just trying to up my points so I could get some more rollbacker spells. You sure this is just humorous? --Ludwigs2 06:09, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
I propose the following for Revdelete and Oversight:
- Revdelete=Brick dissolver: Only game masters may use a brick dissolver, which allows bricks in a dungeon wall to be dissolved. A dissolved brick is nothing but a clear space that still supports the bricks above it, and can be only viewed by game masters or miners. Whether the signature (edit summary) or even the name of the player who made the brick gets dissolved or not can be decided by the game master. The solvent is 69M per-unobtanic acid.
- Brick crystallizer: A game master can also choose to re-crystallize a brick that has been dissolved, turning it back into a normally-functional brick.
- Oversight=Brick vaporizer: Only SGMs and players allowed by SGMs are allowed to carry this. Anyone with it can permanently vaporize a dungeon's bricks. It is used when a player's secret plans and weaknesses are revealed to all the other players.
IP block exemption
I'm going crazy here, but I'm proposing this:
- Ice-proof suite: Can only be worn by game masters or players allowed by game masters. Allows anyone who wears it to pass through a freeze lock (IP block).Jasper Deng (talk) 05:24, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
I thought having the default image was a bit dull, so I changed it to File:WikiGreen.png. There's also File:En-wikipedia arms 3.svg and File:Outlaw-halo.PNG which might be worth a look. It Is Me Here t / c 22:03, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
This is one of the greatest articles I have ever read. Seriously, hats off to the authors, that was clever and very awesome. I'm impressed and greatly amused. :) • Jesse V.(talk) 06:22, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
Non-humorous counterpart to this essay
Could we work in a link to WP:Wikipedia is in the real world#Wikipedia is not a role-playing game somewhere around the "See also" section? --SoledadKabocha (talk) 18:48, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Arbcom is first referred to as the Arch Mages and is then later referred to as the Super Game Masters. This inconsistency should be fixed, but I'm not really sure how to best do it. --Jakob (talk) 21:21, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
- It says, under Super Classes,
I had to say, that's the funnest thing I've seen on here.