Wilson Doctrine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The Wilson Doctrine is a convention in the United Kingdom that restricts the police and intelligence services from tapping the telephones of members of the House of Commons and House of Lords. It was introduced in 1966 and named after Harold Wilson, the Labour Prime Minister who established the rule. Since it was established, the development of new forms of communication, such as mobile phones and email, has led to extensions of the doctrine. However, it was never extended to cover members of the new devolved legislatures.[1]

For a period, GCHQ chose to also apply the same principle to members of the devolved legislatures,[1] but in July 2015 it emerged that the application of the principle to members of the European Parliament and devolved legislatures had been ended.[2]

In October 2015, the Investigatory Powers Tribunal ruled that the doctrine had no legal force.[3]

In November 2015, the Prime Minister made a statement clarifying how the "Government continues to apply the doctrine in the twenty first century".[4] The Investigatory Powers Act 2016 includes a provision to place the Wilson doctrine on a statutory footing for the first time.[5]


Following a spate of scandals involving alleged telephone bugging of MPs, Prime Minister Harold Wilson gave a pledge to MPs that their phones would not be tapped:

With my right hon. Friends, I reviewed the practice when we came to office and decided on balance - and the arguments were very fine - that the balance should be tipped the other way and that I should give this instruction that there was to be no tapping of the telephones of members of Parliament. That was our decision and that is our policy.

— Harold Wilson, House of Commons[6]

However the pledge was qualified in two respects, as the Intelligence and Security Committee made clear in their 2005-06 Annual Report:[7]

But if there was any development of a kind which required a change in the general policy, I would, at such moment as seemed compatible with the security of the country, on my own initiative make a statement to the House about it.

— Harold Wilson, House of Commons[6]

This meant that the Prime Minister could reverse the doctrine in the interests of national security, but that he did not need to reveal the fact to the House of Commons until he choose.[8]


Subsequent prime ministers have regularly confirmed that the ban remains in place, but in January 2006 the Interception of Communications Commissioner, The Rt Hon. Sir Swinton Thomas, asked the government to reconsider the implications of the doctrine on the regulatory framework established under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000. Prime Minister Tony Blair confirmed he would be considering whether or not the ban should be lifted, in order to comply with the act.

However, in March 2006 - in a written ministerial statement - Tony Blair said that following a period of fresh consultation, he had decided the 'Wilson doctrine' will remain in place.[9]

In February 2007, Sir Swinton Thomas again called for the ban to be removed,[10] saying:

It is fundamental to the constitution of this country that no one is above the law or is seen to be above the law. But in this instance, MPs and peers are anything but equal with the rest of the citizens of this country and are above the law.

In September 2007 Prime Minister Gordon Brown reaffirmed the doctrine as "The Wilson Doctrine applies to all forms of interception that are subject to authorisation by Secretary of State warrant."[11]

Public debate[edit]

In February 2008 it was reported that Sadiq Khan had been bugged whilst talking to a constituent in Woodhill Prison. However, since this appeared to have been a face-to-face conversation, even if it was bugged, it may not have been a literal breach of the Wilson Doctrine. An inquiry was launched by Justice Secretary, The Rt Hon. Jack Straw MP.[12]

Further questions about the validity of the doctrine arose in November 2008 after the home and parliamentary offices of Damian Green MP were searched by the Metropolitan Police.[13] Other questions in the Lords asked whether communications which had been stored were protected by the same doctrine.[14]

2015 Investigatory Powers Tribunal case[edit]

Following the global surveillance disclosures by Edward Snowden, three parliamentarians took a case in 2015 to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT) that the Wilson Doctrine was being broken.[15] GCHQ's QC argued that the Wilson Doctrine "does not have force in law and cannot impose legal restraints on the agencies", so the doctrine only has a political effect, and that excluding politicians from mass surveillance wasn't feasible.[8][16] The IPT ruled in favour of GCHQ in October 2015.[3] Subsequently, the Home Secretary said in Parliament that the protection of MPs communications from being intercepted still applies but does not extend to a blanket ban on surveillance.[17][18]

Investigatory Powers Act 2016[edit]

While not codifying the Doctrine, section 26 of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 provides that warrants to intercept the communications of MPs and other Parliamentarians must also require the authorisation of the Prime Minister as well as the relevant Secretary of State and a Judicial Commissioner[19]. It extends to the devolved legislatures as well as UK members of the European Parliament. This provision came into force on 31 May 2018[20].

See also[edit]


  1. ^ a b https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/snoopgate-scandal-brit-spooks-spying-6127095
  2. ^ "First Minister demands urgent assurances". Scottish Legal News. 24 July 2015. Retrieved 27 July 2015.
  3. ^ a b Thomas Tamblyn (14 October 2015). "GCHQ Can Monitor Communications Of MPs And Peers Rules Tribunal". Huffington Post.
  4. ^ Mr David Cameron (Prime Minister) (4 November 2015). "The Wilson Doctrine:Written statement". Parliament. Retrieved 11 November 2015.
  5. ^ "Details of UK website visits 'to be stored for year'". BBC. 4 November 2015. Retrieved 10 November 2015.
  6. ^ a b HC Deb 17 November 1966 vol 736 cc639
  7. ^ Interception of Communications Commissioner. "Report of the Interception of Communications Commissioner for 2005-2006" (PDF). HC 315 SE/2007/17. Retrieved 2009-01-12{{inconsistent citations}}
  8. ^ a b Alexander J Martin (24 July 2015). "The Wilson Doctrine isn't legally binding, MPs CAN be spied on, says QC". The Register. Retrieved 25 July 2015.
  9. ^ Tony Blair (30 March 2006). "Wilson Doctrine". Hansard. UK Parliament. 30 Mar 2006 : Column 95WS. Retrieved 18 January 2014.
  10. ^ Richard Norton-Taylor (2007-02-20). "Watchdog urges end to ban on MP phone taps". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 2008-02-04.
  11. ^ Gordon Brown (12 September 2007). "Members: Surveillance". Hansard. UK Parliament. 12 Sep 2007 : Column 2103W. Retrieved 18 January 2014.
  12. ^ Bell, Thomas (2008-02-04). "Police 'took MP bugging decision'". London: BBC News. Retrieved 2009-01-12.
  13. ^ Andrew Mackinlay. "Written Answers for 8 December 2008 Prime Minister Damian Green". Hansard. 8 Dec 2008 : Column 12W. Archived from the original (– Scholar search) on 2012-10-03. Retrieved 2008-12-08{{inconsistent citations}} Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  14. ^ Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer. "Members of the House: Police Access — Question". Theyworkforyou.com. 8 Dec 2008 : Members of the House: Police Access — Question. Retrieved 2008-12-08{{inconsistent citations}}
  15. ^ Alexander J Martin (23 July 2015). "Galloway and Greens challenge Brit spooks over dragnet snooping". The Register. Retrieved 25 July 2015.
  16. ^ Ian Cobain and Jamie Grierson (24 July 2015). "MPs can no longer remain exempt from surveillance, lawyers concede". The Guardian. Retrieved 25 July 2015.
  17. ^ "Emergency debate: the operation of the Wilson Doctrine". Parliament. 16 October 2015. Retrieved 8 November 2015.
  18. ^ "Wilson Doctrine: MPs' spying protection 'still exists'". BBC. 19 October 2015. Retrieved 8 November 2015.
  19. ^ "s26, Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (Members of Parliament etc.)". Retrieved 31 December 2018.
  20. ^ "Regulation 3(j), The Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (Commencement No. 5 and Transitional and Saving Provisions) Regulations 2018". Retrieved 31 December 2018.

External links[edit]