This article needs additional citations for verification. (April 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Wing fences, also known as boundary layer fences and potential fences are fixed aerodynamic devices attached to aircraft wings. Often seen on swept-wing aircraft, wing fences are flat plates fixed to the upper surfaces parallel to the airflow, typically wrapping around the leading edge. By obstructing span-wise airflow along the wing, they prevent the entire wing from stalling at once, as opposed to wingtip devices, which increase aerodynamic efficiency by seeking to recover wing vortex energy.
As a swept-wing aircraft slows toward the stall speed of the wing, the angle of the leading edge forces some of the airflow sidewise, toward the wing tip. This process is progressive: airflow near the middle of the wing is affected not only by the leading edge angle, but also the spanwise airflow from the wing root. At the wing tip the airflow can end up being almost all spanwise, as opposed to front-to-back over the wing, meaning that the effective airspeed drops well below the stall. Because the geometry of swept wings typically places the wingtips of an aircraft aft of its center of gravity, lift generated at the wingtips tends to create a nose-down pitching moment. When the wingtips stall, both the lift and the associated nose-down pitching moment rapidly diminish. The loss of the nose-down pitching moment leaves the previously balanced aircraft with a net nose-up pitching moment. This forces the nose of the aircraft up, increasing the angle of attack and leading to stall over a greater portion of the wing. The result is a rapid and powerful pitch-up followed by a complete stall, a difficult situation for a pilot to recover from. The "Sabre dance" (which caused many F-100 Super Sabres to crash) is a notable example of this behavior. Spanwise flow can also impede the efficiency of engine air intakes in or near the wing roots resulting in a drop in power, especially at high angles of attack. Such power loss was identified as a contributing factor in two failed takeoffs of the De Havilland Comet 1 shortly after its introduction. Remedial measures included addition of wing fences and restrictions on takeoff rotation.
Wing fences delay, or eliminate, these effects by preventing the spanwise flow from moving too far along the wing and gaining speed. When meeting the fence, the air is directed back over the wing surface. Similar solutions included a notch in the leading edge, as seen on the Avro Arrow, or the use of slats, as on the earlier versions of the F-86. Slats can act as fences directly, in the form of their actuators, but also reduce the problem by improving the angle of attack response of the wing and moving the stall point to a lower speed.
Wolfgang Liebe, who is generally credited with inventing wing fences, filed a patent for it in 1938 while working on the Messerschmitt Bf 109B. After World War II, Soviet military aircraft designers became known for their habit of using wing fences, using them on aircraft as varied as Mikoyan MiG-15, Mikoyan MiG-17, Mikoyan MiG-19, Mikoyan MiG-21, Mikoyan MiG-25, Mikoyan MiG-31, Tupolev Tu-128, Tupolev Tu-95, Tupolev Tu-160 in swept-wing mode, and Tupolev Tu-22Ms.
- Vortilon, a similar device mounted on the underside of the wing
- Boeing 727
- Sud Aviation Caravelle
- De Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter
- BAE Systems Hawk
- Baade 152
- Hurt, H. H. Jr., "NAVAIR 00-80T-80, Aerodynamics for Naval Aviators". Naval Air Systems Command, 1965, p. 86. at faa.gov
- (in German) DE 700625 "Vorrichtung zum Verhindern der Ausbreitung von Strömungsstörungen an Flugzeugflügeln" filed on September 27, 1938.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Wing fences.|