Womyn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The word womyn is one of several alternative spellings of the English word women used by some feminists.[1] There are other spellings, including womban or womon (singular), and wimmin (plural). Some writers who use such alternative spellings see them as an expression of female independence and a repudiation of traditions that define women by reference to a male norm.[2] The alternative spellings avoid suffix "-man" or "-men".

Background[edit]

In Old English sources, the word man was gender-neutral, one of whose meanings was similar to the modern English usage of one as an indefinite pronoun (compare with mankind (man + kind) which means the human race.[3] The words wer and wyf were used to specify a man or woman where necessary, respectively. Combining them into wer-man or wyf-man expressed the concept of "any man" or "any woman".[4][5] Some feminist writers have suggested that this more symmetrical usage reflected more egalitarian notions of gender at the time.[2]

Variants[edit]

Womon/womyn[edit]

The word womyn appeared as an Older Scots spelling of woman[6] in the Scots poetry of James Hogg. Its usage as a feminist spelling of women (with womon as the singular form) first appeared in print in 1976 referring to the first Michigan Womyn's Music Festival.[7]

Womon/wimmin[edit]

The word wimmin appeared in 19th-century renderings of Black American English, without any feminist significance. Z. Budapest promoted the use of word wimmin (singular womon) in the 1970s as part of her Dianic Wicca movement, which claims that present-day patriarchy represents a fall from a matriarchal golden age.[8]

Millie Tant, a fictional character in the British comic Viz, often used the term wimmin when discussing women's rights.[9]

The term wimmin was considered by George P. Krapp to be eye dialect, the literary technique of using nonstandard spelling that implies a pronunciation of the given word that is actually standard. The spelling indicates that the character's speech overall is dialectal, foreign, or uneducated.[10][11] This form of nonstandard spelling differs from others in that a difference in spelling does not indicate a difference in pronunciation of a word. That is, it is dialect to the eye rather than to the ear.[12] It suggests that a character "would use a vulgar pronunciation if there were one" and "is at the level of ignorance where one misspells in this fashion, hence mispronounces as well."[13]

Criticism[edit]

This word has been criticized by trans activists[who?] due to its usage in trans-exclusionary radical feminist circles which excludes trans women from identifying into the category of "woman" and consequently prevents them from accessing spaces and resources for women. See: Womyn-born womyn.[citation needed]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ D. Hatton. "Womyn and the 'L': A Study of the Relationship between Communication Apprehension, Gender, and Bulletin Boards" (abstract), Education Resources Information Center, 1995.
  2. ^ a b Neeru Tandon (2008). Feminism: A Paradigm Shift
  3. ^ In Latin similarly, there is "homo" or "hominis" then "vir" or "viris" and "mulier" or "mulieris"; respectively meaning "man" (gender-neutral) then "adult male" and "adult female".
  4. ^ Spender, Dale. Man-Made Language.
  5. ^ Miller, Casey, and Kate Swift. The Handbook of Non-Sexist Language.
  6. ^ DOST: Woman Archived 2013-05-11 at the Wayback Machine.
  7. ^ "Womyn". Oxford English Dictionary.
  8. ^ Eugene V. Gallagher, W. Michael Ashcraft (2006). Introduction to New and Alternative Religions in America.
  9. ^ Maconie, Stuart. Pies and Prejudice: In search of the North. Edbuty, 2008. p. 132. ISBN 978-0-09-191023-5
  10. ^ Walpole (1974:193, 195)[incomplete short citation]
  11. ^ Rickford & Rickford (2000:23)[incomplete short citation]
  12. ^ "Eye Dialect by Vivian Cook". Homepage.ntlworld.com. Retrieved 2012-06-13. 
  13. ^ Bolinger (1946:337)[incomplete short citation]

Further reading[edit]

  • Sol Steinmetz. "Womyn: The Evidence," American Speech, Vol. 70, No. 4 (Winter, 1995), pp. 429–437