Workers' Party of Korea

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Workers' Party of Korea
Chosŏn Rodongdang
General SecretaryKim Jong-un
Politburo Presidium
Founded24 June 1949; 72 years ago (1949-06-24)
Merger of • Workers' Party of North Korea
 • Workers' Party of South Korea
Headquarters"Forbidden City", Chung-guyŏk, Pyongyang, North Korea
NewspaperRodong Sinmun
Youth wing • Socialist Patriotic Youth League
 • Korean Children's Union
Armed wingKorean People's Army
Paramilitary wingWorker-Peasant Red Guards
Supreme organCentral Committee of the
Workers' Party of Korea
Membership (2021)Increase 6,500,000[1]
Political positionFar-left[2][note 1]
National affiliationDemocratic Front for the
Reunification of the Fatherland
International affiliationIMCWP
Colors  Red
Anthem"Long live the Workers' Party of Korea"[7]
(조선로동당 만세)
"Fly high, our party's flag"
(높이 날려라, 우리의 당기)
Status • Ruling party in North Korea
 • Outlawed in South Korea under the National Security Act
Supreme People's Assembly
607 / 687
Party flag
Flag of the Workers' Party of Korea.svg
Rodong Sinmun, the official newspaper of the WPK Central Committee
Workers' Party of Korea
Workers' Party of Korea.svg
"Workers' Party of Korea" in Hancha (top) and Chosŏn'gŭl (bottom) scripts
North Korean name
South Korean name

The Workers' Party of Korea (WPK)[note 2] is the founding and sole ruling party of North Korea. It is the largest party represented in the Supreme People's Assembly and coexists de jure with two other legal parties making up the Democratic Front for the Reunification of the Fatherland. However, these minor parties are completely subservient to the WPK,[8] and must accept the WPK's "leading role" as a condition of their existence.

The WPK was founded in 1949 with the merger of the Workers' Party of North Korea and the Workers' Party of South Korea. The WPK also controls the Korean People's Army. The WPK is outlawed in South Korea under South Korea's National Security Act and is sanctioned by Australia, the European Union, the United Nations and the United States.[9]

The WPK is organized according to the Monolithic Ideological System and the Great Leader, a system and theory conceived by Kim Yong-ju and Kim Jong-il. The highest body of the WPK is formally the Congress, but in practice a Congress occurs infrequently. Between 1980 and 2016, there were no congresses held. Although the WPK is organizationally similar to communist parties, in practice it is far less institutionalized and informal politics plays a larger role than usual. Institutions such as the Central Committee, the Secretariat, the Central Military Commission (CMC), the Politburo and the Politburo's Presidium have much less power than that formally bestowed on them by the party rules, which is little more than a nominal document. Kim Jong-un is the current WPK leader, serving as General Secretary of the WPK and Chairman of the CMC.

The WPK is committed to Juche, an ideology that promotes Korean national independence and development through the efforts of the popular masses. Although Juche was originally presented as local interpretation of Marxism–Leninism, the party now presents it as a freestanding philosophy. It recognizes the ruling Kim family as the ultimate source of its political thought. The 4th Conference (held in 2012) amended the party rules to state that Kimilsungism–Kimjongilism was "the only guiding idea of the party." Under Kim Jong-il, who governed as chairman of the National Defence Commission, communism was steadily removed from party and state documents in favor of Songun, or military-first politics. The military, rather than the working class, was established as the base of political power. His successor Kim Jong-un has modified this position. Although the party remains committed to national defense, it has replaced Songun with "people-first politics" as its political method[10] and reasserted its commitment to communism.[11]

The party's emblem is an adaptation of the communist hammer and sickle, with a traditional Korean calligraphy brush. The symbols represent the industrial workers (hammer), peasants (sickle) and intelligentsia (ink brush).


Founding and early years (1945–1953)[edit]

On 13 October 1945, the North Korean Bureau of the Communist Party of Korea (NKB–CPK) was established,[12] with Kim Yong-bom as its first chairman.[13] However, the NKB–CPK remained subordinate to the CPK Central Committee, which was headquartered in Seoul and headed by Pak Hon-yong.[14] Two months later, at the 3rd Plenum of the NKB, Kim Yong-bom was replaced by Kim Il-sung, an event which was probably orchestrated by the Soviet Union.[15] In spring 1946 the North Korean Bureau became the Communist Party of North Korea, with Kim Il-sung as its elected chairman.[16] On 22 July 1946 Soviet authorities in North Korea established the United Democratic National Front, a popular front led by the Communist Party of North Korea.[17] The Communist Party of North Korea soon merged with the New People's Party of Korea, a party primarily composed of communists from China.[17] On 28 July 1946 a special commission of the two parties ratified the merger, and it became official the following day.[18] One month later (28–30 August 1946) the party held its founding congress, establishing the Workers' Party of North Korea (WPNK).[18] The congress elected former leader of the New People's Party of Korea Kim Tu-bong as the first WPNK chairman, with Kim Il-sung its appointed deputy chairman.[18] However, despite his formal downgrade in the party's hierarchy, Kim Il-sung remained its leader.[19]

Kim Il-sung (left) with Pak Hon-yong in Pyongyang, 1948

Party control increased throughout the country after the congress.[20] From 27 to 30 March 1948, the WPNK convened its 2nd Congress.[21] While Kim Tu-bong was still the party's formal head, Kim Il-sung presented the main report to the congress.[22] In it he claimed that North Korea was "a base of democracy", in contrast to South Korea, which he believed to be dictatorial.[22] On 28 April 1948 a special session of the Supreme People's Assembly approved the constitution proposed and written by WPNK cadres, which led to the official establishment of an independent North Korea.[23] It did not call for the establishment of an independent North Korea, but for a unified Korea under a communist government; the capital of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) would be Seoul, not Pyongyang.[24] Kim Il-sung was the appointed head of government of the new state, with Kim Tu-bong heading the legislative branch.[25] A year later on 24 June 1949, the Workers' Party of Korea was created with the merger of the WPNK and the Workers' Party of South Korea.[26]

Kim Il-sung was not the most ardent supporter of a military reunification of Korea; that role was played by the South Korean communists, headed by Pak Hon-yong.[27] After several meetings with Soviet leader Joseph Stalin, North Korea invaded South Korea on 25 June 1950, thus beginning the Korean War.[28] With American intervention in the war the DPRK nearly collapsed, but it was saved by Chinese intervention in the conflict.[28] The war had the effect of weakening Soviet influence over Kim Il-sung and the WPK.[29] Around this time, the main fault lines in early WPK politics were created. Four factions formed: "domestic" Koreans (WPK cadres who had remained in Korea during Japanese rule), Soviet Koreans (Koreans from the Soviet Union), Yan'an (Koreans from China) and guerrillas (Kim Il-sung's personal faction).[29] However, Kim would be unable to further strengthen his position until the end of the war.[29]

Kim Il-sung's consolidation of power (1953–1980)[edit]

Propaganda mosaic commemorating the triumphant homecoming of Kim Il-sung after he liberated Korea from Japan

Relations worsened between the WPK and the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) when Stalin's successor, Nikita Khrushchev, began pursuing a policy of de-Stalinization.[30] During the Sino–Soviet conflict, an ideological conflict between the CPSU and the Communist Party of China (CPC), Kim Il-sung maneuvered between the two socialist superpowers; by doing so, he weakened their influence on the WPK.[30] By 1962 Kim Il-sung and the WPK favored the CPC over the CPSU in the ideological struggle, and "for a few years North Korea almost unconditionally supported the Chinese position on all important issues."[30] The primary conflict between the WPK and the CPSU during this period was that Kim Il-sung did not support the denunciation of Stalinism, the creation of a collective leadership and the theory of peaceful coexistence between the capitalist and socialist worlds.[30] Kim Il-sung believed peaceful coexistence synonymous with capitulation, and knew that de-Stalinization in North Korea would effectively end his unlimited power over the WPK.[30] The result of the souring of relations between the CPSU and the WPK was that the Soviet Union discontinued aid to North Korea.[31] As a result, several industries were on the brink of disaster; China was unwilling to increase aid to North Korea.[31] Mao Zedong began the Cultural Revolution shortly thereafter, an event criticized by the WPK as "left-wing opportunism" and a manifestation of the "Trotskyist theory of a permanent revolution."[31] Relations towards the CPSU and the CPC stabilized during the 1960s, with the WPK making it clear it would remain neutral in the Sino–Soviet conflict,[31] thus resulting in the 1966 launch of the Juche program aimed at national self-determination at all levels. This, in turn, strengthened Kim Il-Sung's position in the WPK.[31]

Beginning in the 1960s, Kim Il-sung's cult of personality reached new heights.[32] It had been no greater than Stalin's or Mao's until 1972, when his birthday on 15 April became the country's main public holiday and statues of him began to be built nationwide.[32] Kim became known as "Great Leader", the "Sun of the Nation", "The Iron All-Victorious General" and "Marshal of the All-Mighty Republic" in WPK and state publications; official propaganda stated that "burning loyalty to the leader" was one of the main characteristics of any Korean.[32]

Kim Il-sung and his guerilla faction had purged the WPK of its opposing factions during the 1950s and the 1960s, to the dismay of both the CPC and the CPSU.[29] The domestic faction was the first to go (in 1953–55), followed by the Yan'an faction in 1957–58 and the Soviet Koreans (along with anyone else deemed unfaithful to the WPK leadership) in the 1957–62 purge.[33] According to historian Andrei Lankov, "Kim Il-sung had become not only supreme, but also the omnipotent ruler of North Korea—no longer merely 'first amongst equals', as had been the case in the late 1940s".[34] After purging his WPK opposition, Kim Il-sung consolidated his power base with nepotism and hereditary succession in the Kim family and the guerilla faction.[35] Beginning in the late 1980s, "a high (and increasing) proportion of North Korean high officials have been sons of high officials."[35] Since the 1960s, Kim Il-sung had appointed family members to positions of power.[36] By the early 1990s, a number of leading national offices were held by people in his family: Kang Song-san (Premier of the Administrative Council and member of the WPK Secretariat), Pak Song-chol (Vice President), Hwang Jang-yop and Kim Chung-rin (members of the WPK Secretariat), Kim Yong-sun (Head of the WPK International Department and member of the WPK Secretariat), Kang Hui-won (Secretary of the WPK Pyongyang Municipal Committee and Deputy Premier of the Administrative Council), Kim Tal-hyon (Minister of Foreign Trade), Kim Chan-ju (Minister of Agriculture and Deputy Chairman of the Administrative Council) and Yang Hyong-sop (President of the Academy of Social Sciences and chairman of the Supreme People's Assembly).[36] These individuals were appointed solely because of their ties to the Kim family, and presumably retain their positions as long as the Kim family controls the WPK and the country.[36] The reason for Kim's support of nepotism (his own and that of the guerrilla faction) can be explained by the fact that he did not want the party bureaucracy to threaten his—and his son's—rule as it did in other socialist states.[36]

It was first generally believed by foreign observers that Kim Il-sung was planning for his brother, Kim Yong-ju, to succeed him.[37] Kim Yong-ju's authority gradually increased, until he became co-chairman of the North–South Coordination Committee.[37] From late 1972 to the 6th WPK Congress, Kim Yong-ju became an increasingly remote figure in the regime. At the 6th Congress he lost his Politburo and Central Committee seats,[37] and rumors that Kim Il-sung had begun grooming Kim Jong-il in 1966 were confirmed.[37] From 1974 to the 6th Congress, Kim Jong-il (called the "Party centre" by North Korean media) was the second most powerful man in North Korea.[37] His selection was criticized, with his father accused of creating a dynasty or turning North Korea into a feudal state.[38]

Kim Jong-il's rule (1980–2011)[edit]

Although Kim Jong-il headed the WPK with no pretense of following the party rules, it was revitalized at the 3rd Conference at the end of his rule

With Kim Jong-il's official appointment as heir apparent at the 6th Congress, power became more centralized in the Kim family.[39] WPK officials began to speak openly about his succession, and beginning in 1981 he began to participate in (and lead) tours.[39] In 1982 he was made a Hero of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and wrote On the Juche Idea.[39] While foreign observers believed that Kim Jong-il's appointment would increase participation by the younger generation, in On the Juche Idea he made it clear that his leadership would not mark the beginning of a new generation of leaders.[40] The WPK could not address the crisis facing Kim Il-sung and Kim Jong-il's leadership at home and abroad, in part because of the gerontocracy at the highest level of the WPK and the state.[41]

The Monument to Party Founding in Pyongyang, erected in 1995

With the death of O Jin-u on 25 February 1995, Kim Jong-il became the sole remaining living member of the Presidium (the highest body of the WPK when the Politburo and the Central Committee are not in session).[42] While no member list of the WPK Central Military Commission (CMC, the highest party organ on military affairs) was published from 1993 to 2010, there were clear signs of movement in the military hierarchy during 1995.[43] For the WPK's 50th anniversary, Kim Jong-il initiated a reshuffling of the CMC (and the military leadership in general) to appease the old guard and younger officials.[43] He did not reshuffle the WPK Central Committee or the government, however, and during the 1990s the changes to its membership were caused mostly by its members dying of natural causes.[44]

Beginning in 1995, Kim Jong-il favored the military over the WPK and the state.[44] Problems began to mount as an economic crisis, coupled with a famine in which at least half a million people died, weakened his control of the country.[45] Instead of recommending structural reforms, Kim began to criticize the WPK's lack of control over the economy, lambasting its local and provincial branches for their inability to implement central-level instructions.[46] At a speech celebrating the 50th anniversary of Kim Il-sung University, he said: "The reason why people are loyal to the instructions of the Central Committee is not because of party organizations and workers, but because of my authority."[46] Kim Jong-il said that his father had told him to avoid economics, claiming that it was better left to experts. After this speech, the WPK's responsibility to control the economy was given to the Administrative Council (the central government).[46] By late 1996 Kim Jong-il concluded that neither the WPK nor the central government could run the country, and began shifting control to the military.[47]

On 8 July 1997, the three-year mourning period for Kim Il-sung ended.[48] Later that year, on 8 October, Kim Jong-il was appointed to the newly established office of General Secretary of the Workers' Party of Korea.[48] There was considerable discussion by foreign experts of why Kim Jong-il was appointed General Secretary of the Workers' Party of Korea, instead of succeeding his father as General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Workers' Party of Korea.[48] In a clear breach of the WPK rules, Kim Jong-il was appointed WPK General Secretary in a joint announcement by the 6th Central Committee and the CMC rather than elected by a plenum of the Central Committee.[48] Although it was believed that Kim Jong-il would call a congress shortly after his appointment (to elect a new WPK leadership), he did not.[48] The WPK would not be revitalized organizationally until the 3rd Conference in 2010.[48] Until then, Kim Jong-il ruled as an autocrat;[48] only in WPK institutions considered important were new members and leaders appointed to take the place of dying officials.[48] The 10th Supreme People's Assembly convened on 5 September 1998, amended the North Korean constitution.[49] The amended constitution made the National Defense Commission (NDC), previously responsible for supervising the military, the highest state organ.[50] Although the new constitution gave the cabinet and the NDC more independence from WPK officials, it did not weaken the party.[51] Kim Jong-il remained WPK General Secretary, controlling the Organization and Guidance Department (OGD) and other institutions.[51] While the central WPK leadership composition was not renewed at a single stroke until 2010, the WPK retained its important role as a mass organization.[52]

On 26 June 2010, the Politburo announced that it was summoning delegates for the 3rd Conference,[52] with its official explanation the need to "reflect the demands of the revolutionary development of the Party, which is facing critical changes in bringing about the strong and prosperous state and chuche [Juche] development."[52] The conference met on 28 September, revising the party rules and electing (and dismissing) members of the Central Committee, the Secretariat, the Politburo, the Presidium and other bodies.[52] The WPK removed a sentence from the preamble which expressed the party's commitment "to building a communist society", replacing it with a new adherence to Songun, the "military-first" policies developed by Kim Jong-il.[53] Kim Jong-un was confirmed as heir apparent;[54] Vice Marshal Ri Yong-ho and General Kim Kyong-hui (Kim Jong-il's sister) were appointed to leading positions in the Korean People's Army and the WPK to help him consolidate power.[55] The following year, on 17 December 2011, Kim Jong-il died.[56]

Kim Jong-un's rule (2011–present)[edit]

General Secretary Kim Jong-un in 2019

After Kim Jong-il's death, the North Korean elite consolidated Kim Jong-un's position; he was declared in charge of the country when the official report of his father's death was published on 19 December. On 26 December 2011, official newspaper Rodong Sinmun hailed him as supreme leader of the party and state. On 30 December a meeting of the Politburo officially appointed him Supreme Commander of the Korean People's Army, after he was allegedly nominated for the position by Kim Jong-il in October 2011 (the anniversary of Kim Jong-il's becoming general secretary). Despite the fact that he was not a Politburo member, Kim Jong-un was named to the unofficial position of supreme leader of the Workers' Party of Korea.[citation needed]

After celebrations for Kim Jong-il's 70th birth anniversary, during which he was elevated to the rank of Taewonsu — usually translated as Grand Marshal or Generalissimo — on 18 February the Politburo announced the 4th Party Conference (scheduled for mid-April 2012, near the 100th birth anniversary of Kim Il-sung) "to glorify the sacred revolutionary life and feats of Kim Jong-il for all ages and accomplish the Juche cause, the Songun revolutionary cause, rallied close around Kim Jong-un".[57]

At the 4th Party Conference on 11 April, Kim Jong-il was declared Eternal General Secretary and Kim Jong-un was elected to the newly created post of First Secretary of the Workers' Party of Korea and the Presidium. The conference proclaimed Kimilsungism-Kimjongilism "the only guiding idea of the party".[58]

In December 2013, the party experienced its first open inner struggle in decades with the purge of Jang Song-taek.[citation needed]

The party has seen somewhat of a revival under Kim Jong-un, with more frequent meetings. There have been two conferences, after a gap of 44 years, and a congress between 2010 and 2016.[59] After staging a huge military parade in celebration of the party's 70th anniversary on 10 October 2015, the Politburo announced that its 7th Congress will be held on 6 May 2016 after a 36-year hiatus. The congress announced the first Five-Year Plan since the 1980s and gave Kim Jong-un the new title of Chairman, which replaced the previous office of First Secretary.[60] In January 2021, Kim Jong-un was given the title of General Secretary, replacing the title of Chairman.[61][62]

It was reported in June 2021 that the party set up the post of 'First Secretary', with speculation that Jo Yong-won[63][64] or Kim Tok-hun, the Premier of North Korea filling the position.[65]


Great Leader[edit]

North Korea considers humanity the driving force of history. "Popular masses are placed in the center of everything, and the leader is the center of the masses".[66] Traditional Marxism considers class struggle the driving force of historical progress. However, Marxism also sees class struggle as eventually coming to an end, when class distinctions begin to disappear in a communist society.[67] From this point on, humanity can begin to "more and more consciously, make his own history" as human society ceases to be driven by social forces such as class struggle, but instead becomes "the result of his own free actions."[68]

Juche is an anthropocentric ideology in which "man is the master of everything and decides everything".[66] Similar to Marxist–Leninist thought, Juche believes that history is law-governed but only man drives progress: "the popular masses are the drivers of history".[69] From the perspective of Juche, the struggle for humanity as a whole to make their own history is restrained by the ruling classes in class society.[70] Additionally, only the working class can overcome these restraints and achieve a society where humanity can independently and creatively make their own history.[71] Juche is inline with historical materialism, viewing mankind's ability to drive their own history the culmination of a long-term historical process, whose foundations were laid by capitalism's ushering in of the working class, and thus Juche is unique to the socialist era.[72]

However, for the masses to succeed they need a Great Leader.[69] Marxism–Leninism argues that the people will lead, on the basis of their relationship to production. In North Korea a singular Great Leader is considered essential, and this helped Kim Il-sung establish a one-man autocracy.[73]

This theory makes the Great Leader an absolute, supreme leader.[74] The working class thinks not for itself, but through the Great Leader;[74] he is the mastermind of the working class and its only legitimate representative.[74] Class struggle can only be realized through the Great Leader; difficult tasks in general (and revolutionary changes in particular) can only be introduced through—and by—him.[74] Thus, in historical development the Great Leader is the leading force of the working class;[74] he is a flawless, incorruptible human being who never makes mistakes, is always benevolent and rules for the benefit of the masses (working class).[75] For the Great Leader system to function, a unitary ideology must be in place;[76] in North Korea, this is known as the Monolithic Ideological System.[76]

Kim dynasty[edit]

The Kim dynasty began with Kim Il-sung, the first leader of the WPK and North Korea.[77] The official ideology is that the North Korean system functions "well" because it was established by Kim Il-sung, whose successors follow his bloodline.[78] Every child is educated in "the revolutionary history of the Great Leader" and "the revolutionary history of the Dear Leader" (Kim Jong-il).[78] Kim Il-sung's first choice as successor was Kim Yong-ju, his brother, but he later decided to appoint his son Kim Jong-il instead; this decision was formalized at the 6th Congress.[37] Kim Jong-il appointed his youngest son, Kim Jong-un, as his successor at the 3rd WPK Conference in 2010, and his son succeeded him in early 2011.[54] Because of the familial succession and the appointment of family members to high office, the Kim family has been called a dynasty and a royal family.[79] Suh Dae-sook, the author of Kim Il Sung: The North Korean Leader, notes that "What he [Kim Il-sung] has built in the North however, resembles more a political system to accommodate his personal rule than a communist or socialist state in Korea. It is not the political system he built that will survive him; it is his son [Kim Jong-il], whom he has designated heir, who will succeed his reign."[80] The ruling Kim family in North Korea (Kim Il-sung, Kim Jong-il and Kim Jong-un) has been described as a de facto absolute monarchy[81][82][83] or "hereditary dictatorship".[84] In 2013, Clause 2 of Article 10 of the new edited Ten Fundamental Principles of the Workers' Party of Korea states that the party and revolution must be carried "eternally" by the "Baekdu (Kim's) bloodline".[85]

Monolithic Ideological System[edit]

Ten Principles for the Establishment of a Monolithic Ideological System are a set of ten principles and 65 clauses which establishes standards for governance and guides the behaviors of the people of North Korea.[86] The Ten Principles have come to supersede the national constitution or edicts by the Workers' Party, and in practice serve as the supreme law of the country.[87][88][89]


Tomatoes, which are completely red to the core, are considered worthy Communists; apples, which are red only on the surface, are considered to need ideological improvement; and grapes are completely hopeless.

— The three main classifications in North Korean society (core, wavering, and hostile), metaphorically described as tomatoes, apples, and grapes, respectively.[90]

Songbun is the name given to the caste system established on 30 May 1957 by the WPK Politburo when it adopted the resolution, "On the Transformation of the Struggle with Counter-Revolutionary Elements into an All-People All-Party Movement" (also known as the 30 May Resolution).[91] This led to a purge in North Korean society in which every individual was checked for his or her allegiance to the party and its leader.[92] The purge began in earnest in 1959, when the WPK established a new supervisory body headed by Kim Il-sung's brother, Kim Yong-ju.[92] The people of North Korea were divided into three "forces" (hostile, neutral or friendly),[92] and the force in which a person was classified was hereditary.[92] Hostile forces cannot live near Pyongyang (the country's capital) or other major cities, or near North Korea's border with other countries.[92] Songbun affects access to educational and employment opportunities and, particularly, eligibility to join the WPK.[90] However, its importance has diminished with the fall of the communist regimes in Eastern Europe and the collapse of the North Korean economy (and the Public Distribution System) during the 1990s.[93]


Central organization[edit]

The headquarters of the WPK Central Committee and hence the party

The Congress is the party's highest body, and convenes on an irregular basis.[94] According to the party rules, the Central Committee can convene a congress if it gives the rest of the party at least a six months' notice.[94] The party rules gives the Congress seven responsibilities:[94]

  1. Electing the Central Committee
  2. Electing the Central Auditing Commission
  3. Electing the General Secretary
  4. Examining the report of the outgoing Central Committee
  5. Examining the report of the outgoing Central Auditing Commission
  6. Discussing and enacting party policies
  7. Revising the party rules and making amendments to these

In between WPK national meetings, the Central Committee is the highest decision-making institution.[95] The Central Auditing Commission is responsible for supervising the party's finances and works separately from the Central Committee.[96] The Central Committee elects the composition of several bodies to carry out its work.[97] The 1st Plenary Session of a newly elected central committee elects the Central Military Commission (CMC), the Secretariat, the Politburo, the Presidium, and the Control Commission.[98][99] The Politburo exercises the functions and powers of the Central Committee when a plenum is not in session.[100] The Presidium is the party's highest decision-making organ when the Politburo, the Central Committee, Conference of Representatives and the Congress are not in session.[101] It was established at the 6th National Congress in 1980.[101] The CMC is the highest decision-making institution on military affairs within the party, and controls the operations of the Korean People's Army.[102] The WPK General Secretary is by right Chairman of the CMC. Meanwhile, the Secretariat is the top implementation body and is headed by the WPK General Secretary and consists of several sectretaries who normally head Central Committee departments, commissions, publications, and other organizations under it.[103] The Control Commission resolves disciplinary issues involving party members. Investigative subjects range from graft to anti-party and counter-revolutionary activities, generally encompassing all party rules violations.[98]

A first plenum of the Central Committee also elects the heads of departments, bureaus, and other institutions to pursue its work.[104][105] The WPK currently has more than 15 Central Committee departments.[105] Through these departments it controls several mass organisations and newspapers, such as Rodong Sinmun for instance.[105] The Korean People's Army (KPA) is, according to the WPK rules, the "revolutionary armed power of the Workers' Party of Korea which inherited revolutionary traditions."[106] The leading organ within the KPA is the General Political Bureau (GPB), which according to the WPK rules is defined "as an executive organ of the KPA Party Committee, and is therefore entitled to the same authority as that of the Central Committee in conducting its activities."[107] The GPB controls the party apparatus and every political officer within the KPA.[107]

Lower-level organization[edit]

Kim Il-sung badge with the WPK emblem

The WPK has local organizations for the three levels of local North Korean government: (1) provinces and province-level municipalities, (2) special city, ordinary cities and urban districts, and (3) rural counties and villages.[108] North Korea has nine provinces, each with a provincial party committee; their composition is decided by the WPK.[108]

The WPK has two types of membership: regular and probationary.[109] Membership is open to those 18 years of age and older, and is granted after the submission of an application (endorsed by two party members with at least two years in good standing) to a cell.[109] The application is acted on by the cell's plenary session, and an affirmative decision is subject to ratification by a county-level party committee.[109] After an application is approved a mandatory one-year probationary period may be waived under unspecified "special circumstances", allowing the candidate to become a full member.[109] Recruitment is under the direction of the Organization and Guidance Department and its local branches.[109]

The WPK claimed a membership of more than three million in 1988, a significant increase from the two million members announced in 1976; the increase may have resulted from the Three Revolutions Team Movement mobilization drive.[110] At the time, 12 percent of the population held party membership, an abnormally large number for a communist country and a figure only comparable to Romania.[111] Later figures have not been made publicly available,[110] but membership today is estimated at four million.[112] The WPK has three constituencies: industrial workers, peasants and intellectuals (office workers).[110] Since 1948 industrial workers have constituted the largest percentage of party members, followed by peasants and intellectuals.[110] Beginning in the 1970s, when North Korea's population reached the 50-percent-urban mark, the composition of the party's groups changed; more people working in state-owned enterprises were party members, and the number of members in agricultural cooperatives decreased.[113]


The WPK maintains a leftist image[114] and normally sends a delegation to the International Meeting of Communist and Workers' Parties, where it has some support;[115] its 2011 resolution, "Let us jointly commemorate the Birth Centenary of the Great Leader comrade President Kim Il Sung as a Grand Political Festival of the World's Humankind", was signed by 30 of the 79 attending parties.[116] The WPK also sees itself as part of the worldwide leftist and socialist movement; during the Cold War, the WPK and North Korea had a policy of "exporting revolution", aiding leftist guerrillas worldwide. However, others argue the WPK ideology is xenophobic nationalist or far-right.[4][5][3]


The Juche Tower in Pyongyang. The torch at the top symbolizes Juche, while the three figures in front represent the WPK.

Relationship to Marxism–Leninism[edit]

Although the term "Juche" was first used in Kim Il-sung's speech (given in 1955), "On Eliminating Dogmatism and Formalism and Establishing Juche in Ideological Work", Juche as a coherent ideology did not develop until the 1960s.[117] Similar to Stalinism, it led to the development of an unofficial (later formalized) ideological system defending the central party leadership.[118] Until about 1972, Juche was called a "creative application" of Marxism–Leninism and "the Marxism–Leninism of today", and Kim Il-sung was hailed as "the greatest Marxist–Leninist of our time".[118] However, by 1976 Juche had become a separate ideology; Kim Jong-il called it "a unique ideology, the contents and structures which cannot simply be described as Marxist–Leninist."[118]

At the 5th Congress, Juche was elevated to the same level as Marxism–Leninism.[119] It gained in prominence during the 1970s, and at the 6th Congress in 1980 it was recognized as the WPK's only ideology.[119] During the following decade, Juche transformed from practical to pure ideology.[119] On the Juche Idea, the primary text on Juche, was published in Kim Jong-il's name in 1982.[120] Juche is, according to this study, inexorably linked with Kim Il-sung and "represents the guiding idea of the Korean Revolution ... we are confronted with the honorable task of modeling the whole society on the Juche idea".[120] Kim Jong-il says in the work that Juche is not simply a creative application of Marxism–Leninism, but "a new era in the development of human history".[120] The WPK's break with basic Marxist–Leninist premises is spelled out clearly in the article, "Let Us March Under the Banner of Marxism–Leninism and the Juche Idea".[121]

Despite Juche's conception as a creative application of Marxism and Leninism,[122] some scholars claim it has little direct connection to them.[123] Policies may be explained without a Marxist or Leninist rationale, making the identification of specific influences from these ideologies difficult.[123] Some analysis claim is easier to connect Juche with nationalism, but not a unique form of nationalism. Although the WPK claims to be socialist-patriotic,[123] some analysts claim its socialist patriotism would be more similar to bourgeois nationalism; the chief difference is that socialist patriotism is nationalism in a socialist state.[124] Juche developed as a reaction to foreign occupation, involvement and influence (primarily by the Chinese and Soviets) in North Korean affairs, and may be described "as a normal and healthy reaction of the Korean people to the deprivation they suffered under foreign domination."[125] However, there is nothing uniquely Marxist or Leninist in this reaction; the primary reason for its description as "communist" is that it occurred in a self-proclaimed socialist state.[125] The WPK (and the North Korean leadership in general) have not explained in detail how their policies are Marxist, Leninist or communist; Juche is defined as "Korean", and the others as "foreign".[126]

Basic tenets[edit]

You requested me to give a detailed explanation of the Juche idea. But there is no end to it. All the policies and lines of our Party emanate from the Juche idea and they embody this idea.

— Kim Il-sung, when asked by a Japanese interviewer to define Juche[127]

Juche's primary objective for North Korea is political, economic and military independence.[128] Kim Il-sung, in his "Let Us Defend the Revolutionary Spirit of Independence, Self-reliance, and Self-defense More Thoroughly in All Fields of State Activities" speech to the Supreme People's Assembly in 1967, summarized Juche:[128]

The government of the republic will implement with all consistency the line of independence, self-sustenance, and self-defense to consolidate the political independence of the country (chaju), build up more solidly the foundations of an independent national economy capable of insuring the complete unification, independence, and prosperity of our nation (charip) and increasing the country's defense capabilities, so as to safeguard the security of the fatherland reliably by our own force (chawi), by splendidly embodying our Party's idea of Juche in all fields."[129]

The principle of political independence known as chaju is one of Juche's central tenets.[130] Juche stresses equality and mutual respect among nations, asserting that every state has the right of self-determination.[130] In practice, the beliefs in self-determination and equal sovereignty have turned North Korea into a perceived "hermit kingdom".[130] As interpreted by the WPK, yielding to foreign pressure or intervention would violate chaju and threaten the country's ability to defend its sovereignty.[130] This may explain why Kim Jong-il believed that the Korean revolution would fail if North Korea became dependent on a foreign entity.[130] In relations with fellow socialist countries China and the Soviet Union Kim Il-sung urged cooperation, mutual support and dependence, acknowledging that it was important for North Korea to learn from other countries.[130] Despite this, he abhorred the idea that North Korea could (or should) depend on the two nations and did not want to dogmatically follow their example.[130] Kim Il-sung said that the WPK needed to "resolutely repudiate the tendency to swallow things of others undigested or imitate them mechanically", attributing the success of North Korea on the WPK's independence in implementing policies.[130] To ensure North Korean independence, official pronouncements stressed the need for the people to unite under the WPK and the Great Leader.[130]

Economic independence (charip) is seen as the material basis of chaju.[130] One of Kim Il-sung's greatest fears involved North Korean dependence on foreign aid; he believed it would threaten the country's ability to develop socialism, which only a state with a strong, independent economy could do.[130] Charip emphasizes an independent national economy based on heavy industry; this sector, in theory, would then drive the rest of the economy.[130] Kim Jong-il said:[131]

Building an independent national economy means building an economy which is free from dependence on others and which stands on its own feet, an economy which serves one's own people and develops on the strength of the resources of one's own country and by the efforts of one's people.[131]

Kim Il-sung considered military independence (chawi) crucial.[131] Acknowledging that North Korea might need military support in a war against imperialist enemies, he emphasized a domestic response and summed up the party's (and state's) attitude towards military confrontation: "We do not want war, nor are we afraid of it, nor do we beg peace from the imperialists."[131]

According to Juche, because of his consciousness man has ultimate control over himself and the ability to change the world.[132] This differs from classical Marxism, which believes that humans depend on their relationship to the means of production more than on themselves.[133] The Juche view of a revolution led by a Great Leader, rather than a group of knowledgeable revolutionaries, is a break from Lenin's concept of a vanguard party.[133]


Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels did not clarify the difference between state and law, focusing on class divisions within nations.[118] They argued that nation and law (as it existed then) would be overthrown and replaced by proletarian rule.[118] This was the mainstream view of Soviet theoreticians during the 1920s; however, with Stalin at the helm in 1929 it was under attack.[134] He criticized Nikolai Bukharin's position that the proletariat was hostile to the inclinations of the state, arguing that since the state (the Soviet Union) was in transition from capitalism to socialism the relationship between the state and the proletariat was harmonious.[134] By 1936, Stalin argued that the state would still exist if the Soviet Union reached the communist mode of production if the socialist world was encircled by capitalist forces.[134] Kim Il-sung took this position to its logical conclusion, arguing that the state would exist after North Korea reached the communist mode of production until a future world revolution.[134] As long as capitalism survived, even if the socialist world predominated, North Korea could still be threatened by the restoration of capitalism.[135]

The revival of the term "state" in the Soviet Union under Stalin led to the revival of "nation" in North Korea under Kim Il-sung.[135] Despite official assertions that the Soviet Union was based on "class" rather than "state", the latter was revived during the 1930s.[135] In 1955 Kim Il-sung expressed a similar view in his speech, "On Eliminating Dogmatism and Formalism and Establishing Juche in Ideological Work":[135]

What we are doing now is not a revolution in some foreign country but our Korean revolution. Therefore, every ideological action must benefit the Korean revolution. To fulfill the Korean revolution, one should be perfectly cognizant of the history of our national struggle, of Korea's geography, and our customs.[135]

From then on, he and the WPK stressed the roles of "revolutionary tradition" and Korea's cultural tradition in its revolution.[135] At party meetings, members and cadres learned about North Korea's national prestige and its coming rejuvenation.[135] Traditional customs were revived, to showcase Korean-ness.[135] By 1965, Kim Il-sung claimed that if communists continued opposing individuality and sovereignty, the movement would be threatened by dogmatism and revisionism.[136] He criticized those communists who, he believed, subscribed to "national nihilism by praising all things foreign and vilifying all things national" and tried to impose foreign models on their own country.[136] By the 1960s, Juche was a full-fledged ideology calling for a distinct path for North Korean socialist construction and non-interference in its affairs; however, a decade later it was defined as a system whose "fundamental principle was the realization of sovereignty".[136]

Although WPK theoreticians were initially hostile towards the terms "nation" and "nationalism" because of the influence of the Stalinist definition of "state", by the 1970s their definition was changed from "a stable, historically formed community of people based on common language, territory, economic life, and culture" to include "shared bloodline".[136] During the 1980s a common economic life was removed from the definition, with shared bloodline receiving increased emphasis.[137] With a democratic transition in South Korea and the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the WPK revised the meaning of nationalism.[137] Previously defined in Stalinist terms as a bourgeois weapon to exploit the workers, nationalism changed from a reactionary to a progressive idea.[137] Kim Il-sung differentiated "nationalism" from what he called "genuine nationalism"; while genuine nationalism was a progressive idea, nationalism remained reactionary:[137]

True nationalism (genuine nationalism) is similar to patriotism. Only a genuine patriot can become a devoted and true internationalist. In this sense, when I say communist, at the same time, I mean nationalist and internationalist.[137]

Allegations of xenophobia and racism[edit]

Whatever the name and however elaborate his claim, Kim's Juche idea is nothing more than xenophobic nationalism that has little relevance to communism.

Suh Dae-Sook, author of Kim Il-sung: The North Korean Leader[138]

During the 1960s the WPK began forcing ethnic Koreans to divorce their European spouses (who were primarily from the Eastern Bloc), with a high-ranking WPK official calling the marriages "a crime against the Korean race" and Eastern Bloc embassies in the country beginning to accuse the regime of fascism.[3] In May 1963, a Soviet diplomat described Kim Il-sung's political circle as a "political Gestapo".[3] Similar remarks were made by other Eastern Bloc officials in North Korea, with the East German ambassador calling the policy "Goebbelsian" (a reference to Joseph Goebbels, Hitler's minister of propaganda).[3] Although this was said during a nadir in relations between North Korea and the Eastern Bloc, it illustrated a perception of racism in Kim Il-sung's policies.[3]

In his book The Cleanest Race (2010), Brian Reynolds Myers dismisses the idea that Juche is North Korea's leading ideology. He views its public exaltation as designed to deceive foreigners; it exists to be praised rather than followed.[139] Myers writes that Juche is a sham ideology, developed to extol Kim Il-sung as a political thinker comparable to Mao Zedong.[140] According to Myers, North Korean military-first policy, racism and xenophobia (exemplified by race-based incidents such as the attempted lynching of black Cuban diplomats and forced abortions for North Korean women pregnant with ethnic Chinese children) indicate a base in far-right politics (inherited from Imperial Japan during its colonial occupation of Korea) rather than the far-left.[139][141] However, Andrei Lankov, a scholar and specialist in Korean studies, disputes Myers' analysis and doubts whether it has any relation to reality.[citation needed]

Electoral history[edit]

Supreme People's Assembly elections[edit]

Election Party leader Seats +/– Position
1948 Kim Il-sung
157 / 572
Increase 157 Increase 1st
178 / 215
Increase 21 Steady 1st
371 / 383
Increase 193 Steady 1st
288 / 457
Decrease 83 Steady 1st
127 / 541
Decrease 161 Steady 1st
1977 unknown / 579
1982 unknown / 615
1986 unknown / 655
601 / 687
Steady 1st
1998 Kim Jong-il
594 / 687
Decrease 7 Steady 1st
2003 unknown / 687
606 / 687
Steady 1st
2014 Kim Jong-un
607 / 687
Increase 1 Steady 1st
2019 unknown / 687

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Some scholars argue that the ideology of the Workers' Party of Korea is racist,[3] xenophobically nationalist with "little relevance to communism",[4] or even far-right in nature,[5] while others like Alzo David-West argue against such a notion. David-West also claimed that the political system in North Korea is different from the traditional Stalinist system.[6]
  2. ^ Korean조선로동당; Hanja朝鮮勞動黨; MRChosŏn Rodongdang



  1. ^ 나혜윤 (6 January 2021). "北, 당원 대폭 늘었나 ... 당 대회 참석수로 '650만 명' 추정". 뉴스1 (in Korean). Retrieved 5 November 2021.
  2. ^ Falletti, Sébastien (2016). Corée du Sud : Le goût du miracle: L'Âme des Peuples (in French). Nevicata. ISBN 9782875230867. Entre ce courant droitier à Séoul et l'extrême gauche au pouvoir à Pyongyang, la conciliation est devenue impossible. ['Between this right-wing current in Seoul and the far-left in power in Pyongyang, reconciliation has become impossible.']
  3. ^ a b c d e f Becker 2005, p. 66.
  4. ^ a b Suh 1988, p. 313 & 139.
  5. ^ a b Myers 2011, pp. 9, 11–12.
  6. ^ David-West, Alzo (2012). "North Korea and the Opinion of Fascism: A Case of Mistaken Identity". North Korean Review. 8 (1): 105–116. doi:10.3172/NKR.8.1.105. JSTOR 43910295.
  7. ^ 조선로동당 만세 [Long Live the Workers' Party of Korea]. (in Korean). Retrieved 15 January 2018.
  8. ^ Cha & Hwang 2009, p. 214.
  9. ^ "Executive Order -- Blocking Property of the Government of North Korea and the Workers' Party of Korea, and Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to North Korea". The White House. 16 March 2016. Retrieved 14 November 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  10. ^ "북한 노동당 규약 주요 개정 내용" (in Korean). Yonhap News Agency. 1 June 2021. Retrieved 13 June 2021.
  11. ^ Kim, Jong-un (7 April 2021). "Closing Speech to the 6th Conference of WPK Cell Secretaries". National Committee of North Korea. Retrieved 11 August 2021.
  12. ^ Lankov 2002, p. 20.
  13. ^ Lankov 2002, p. 21.
  14. ^ Lankov 2002, p. 22.
  15. ^ Lankov 2002, pp. 21–22.
  16. ^ Lankov 2002, pp. 28–29.
  17. ^ a b Lankov 2002, p. 29.
  18. ^ a b c Lankov 2002, p. 31.
  19. ^ Lankov 2002, pp. 31–32.
  20. ^ Lankov 2002, pp. 33–40.
  21. ^ Lankov 2002, p. 40.
  22. ^ a b Lankov 2002, p. 42.
  23. ^ Lankov 2002, p. 44.
  24. ^ Lankov 2002, p. 45.
  25. ^ Lankov 2002, p. 47.
  26. ^ "KBS WORLD Radio".
  27. ^ Lankov 2002, p. 60.
  28. ^ a b Lankov 2002, p. 61.
  29. ^ a b c d Lankov 2002, p. 62.
  30. ^ a b c d e Lankov 2002, p. 65.
  31. ^ a b c d e Lankov 2002, p. 66.
  32. ^ a b c Lankov 2002, p. 70.
  33. ^ Lankov 2002, pp. 62–63.
  34. ^ Lankov 2002, p. 63.
  35. ^ a b Lankov 2002, p. 72.
  36. ^ a b c d Lankov 2002, p. 73.
  37. ^ a b c d e f Lee 1982, p. 442.
  38. ^ Lee 1982, p. 434.
  39. ^ a b c Buzo 1999, p. 105.
  40. ^ Buzo 1999, pp. 105–106.
  41. ^ Buzo 1999, p. 106.
  42. ^ Gause 2011, p. 7.
  43. ^ a b Gause 2011, p. 8.
  44. ^ a b Gause 2011, p. 11.
  45. ^ Gause 2011, pp. 11–13.
  46. ^ a b c Gause 2011, p. 13.
  47. ^ Gause 2011, p. 15.
  48. ^ a b c d e f g h Gause 2011, p. 18.
  49. ^ Gause 2011, p. 22.
  50. ^ Gause 2011, p. 23.
  51. ^ a b Gause 2011, p. 24.
  52. ^ a b c d Gause 2013, p. 20.
  53. ^ O'Doherty, Dr Mark (16 April 2017). The Legacy of Kim Jong-un and the Workers' Party in North Korea – A One-Party State facilitating Militarism, Nuclear Armament and Disregard for Human Rights. p. 34. ISBN 9781365896538.
  54. ^ a b Gause 2013, pp. 30–32.
  55. ^ Choi & Hibbitts 2010, p. 3.
  56. ^ Gause 2013, p. 19.
  57. ^ "DPRK's ruling party to convene conference in April". Archived from the original on 8 January 2014.
  58. ^ 4th Party Conference of WPK Held, Rodong Sinmun, 12 April 2012.
  59. ^ Frank, Ruediger (19 April 2018). "The North Korean Parliamentary Session and Budget Report 2018: Cautious Optimism for the Summit Year". 38 North. U.S.-Korea Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  60. ^ "North Korea leader Kim becomes chairman of ruling Workers' Party: NHK". Reuters. 9 May 2016. Retrieved 6 January 2020.
  61. ^ "North Korea's leader Kim Jong Un given new title in symbolic move aimed at bolstering his authority". CNBC. 11 January 2021. Retrieved 2 March 2021.
  62. ^ 朝鮮労働党規約(2021年1月9日改正・抜粋訳) 1/3. KoreaWorldTimes (in Japanese). 5 June 2021. Retrieved 6 June 2021.
  63. ^ "N. Korea creates 'first secretary' post in revised party rules". Yonhap News Agency. 1 June 2021. Archived from the original on 1 June 2021.
  64. ^ "N.Korea's ruling party sets up new post under leader Kim -Yonhap". Reuters. 1 June 2021. Archived from the original on 1 June 2021.
  65. ^ "Kim Jong Un gets new second-in-command in major changes to North Korea's ruling party". 9News. 3 June 2021. Archived from the original on 3 June 2021.
  66. ^ a b Lee 2004, p. 4.
  67. ^ Marx, Karl. Manifesto of the Communist Party. When, in the course of development, class distinctions have disappeared, and all production has been concentrated in the hands of a vast association of the whole nation, the public power will lose its political character. Political power, properly so called, is merely the organised power of one class for oppressing another. If the proletariat during its contest with the bourgeoisie is compelled, by the force of circumstances, to organise itself as a class, if, by means of a revolution, it makes itself the ruling class, and, as such, sweeps away by force the old conditions of production, then it will, along with these conditions, have swept away the conditions for the existence of class antagonisms and of classes generally, and will thereby have abolished its own supremacy as a class. In place of the old bourgeois society, with its classes and class antagonisms, we shall have an association, in which the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all.
  68. ^ Engels, Friedrich. Socialism: Utopian and Scientific. With the seizing of the means of production by society, production of commodities is done away with, and, simultaneously, the mastery of the product over the producer. Anarchy in social production is replaced by systematic, definite organization. The struggle for individual existence disappears. Then, for the first time, man, in a certain sense, is finally marked off from the rest of the animal kingdom, and emerges from mere animal conditions of existence into really human ones. The whole sphere of the conditions of life which environ man, and which have hitherto ruled man, now comes under the dominion and control of man, who for the first time becomes the real, conscious lord of nature, because he has now become master of his own social organization. The laws of his own social action, hitherto standing face-to-face with man as laws of Nature foreign to, and dominating him, will then be used with full understanding, and so mastered by him. Man's own social organization, hitherto confronting him as a necessity imposed by Nature and history, now becomes the result of his own free action. The extraneous objective forces that have, hitherto, governed history,pass under the control of man himself. Only from that time will man himself, more and more consciously, make his own history — only from that time will the social causes set in movement by him have, in the main and in a constantly growing measure, the results intended by him. It is the ascent of man from the kingdom of necessity to the kingdom of freedom.
  69. ^ a b Lee 2004, p. 5.
  70. ^ Jong-il, Kim. On the Juche Idea. There were ideas which reflected the aspirations of progressive classes of society even before the emergence of the working class. But due to their historical and class limitations the trends of thought in the past age could not but be hampered in the role they played in social development. The revolutionary ideas of the working class alone can correctly reflect the demands of the time and the aspirations of the popular masses and give a powerful stimulus to socio-historical development by inspiring the people to wage the revolutionary struggle.
  71. ^ Jong-il, Kim. On the Juche Idea. The communist movement organized and developed by the working class is the highest form of creative movement in human history. This is a movement to build a society where the independence and creativity of the masses of the people are fully realized, the highest ideal of mankind which is fundamentally different from all class societies that have existed in history. The creative power of the masses, too, is exploited fully in the revolutionary movement of the working class. It is not until their involvement in the revolutionary movement of the working class, the communist movement, that the working masses whose creative activity has been restrained by the ruling classes during the whole period of antagonistic class societies, become genuine creators of history who transform the world to meet their own will and desire and shape their destiny in an independent manner.
  72. ^ Jong-il, Kim. On the Juche Idea. The appearance of the working class on the arena of history ushered in a new era in human history. The new historical conditions under which the revolution against capital had started, urgently demanded a revolutionary idea which would bring home the inevitability of the downfall of capitalism and the triumph of socialism to the working class who had risen up in struggle. The most important question in this was to vanquish the idealism and metaphysics which had sanctified the domination of reactionary capital and preached its eternity, and to elaborate a scientific world outlook of the working class. The materialistic dialectical world outlook came into being as a reflection of this requirement of the times. The progress of the times is accompanied by the development of the world outlook. The steady expansion and development of the revolution which started with the emergence of the working class, gave birth to a new age when the working masses who had so far been the object of history appeared as its masters. The new age that witnessed the appearance of the working class and other working masses as a great force controlling the world, demanded the evolvement of a new world outlook which would enable them to become masters of their own destiny, shaping it in an independent and creative way, and to realize successfully the historic cause of national liberation, class emancipation and human freedom.
  73. ^ Lee 2004, p. 6.
  74. ^ a b c d e Lee 2004, p. 7.
  75. ^ Lee 2004, p. 8.
  76. ^ a b Lee 2004, p. 9.
  77. ^ Becker 2005, p. 44.
  78. ^ a b Lankov 2007, p. 29.
  79. ^ Lankov, Andrei (15 January 2014). "The family feuds of the Kim dynasty". NK News. Retrieved 18 March 2014.
  80. ^ Suh 1988, p. xviii.
  81. ^ Young W. Kihl, Hong Nack Kim. North Korea: The Politics of Regime Survival. Armonk, New York, USA: M. E. Sharpe, Inc., 2006. Pp 56.
  82. ^ Robert A. Scalapino, Chong-Sik Lee. The Society. University of California Press, 1972. Pp. 689.
  83. ^ Bong Youn Choy. A history of the Korean reunification movement: its issues and prospects. Research Committee on Korean Reunification, Institute of International Studies, Bradley University, 1984. Pp. 117.
  84. ^ Sheridan, Michael (16 September 2007). "A tale of two dictatorships: The links between North Korea and Syria". The Times. London. Retrieved 9 April 2010.
  85. ^ The Twisted Logic of the N.Korean Regime, Chosun Ilbo, 2013-08-13, Accessed date: 11 January 2017
  86. ^ Namgung Min (13 October 2008). "Kim Jong Il's Ten Principles: Restricting the People". Daily NK. Archived from the original on 8 April 2014. Retrieved 20 January 2014.
  87. ^ "N. Korea revises leadership ideology to legitimize rule of Kim Jong-un". Yonhap News Agency. 12 August 2013. Retrieved 20 January 2014.
  88. ^ Lim, Jae-Cheon (2008). Kim Jong-il's Leadership of North Korea. United Kingdom: Routledge. ISBN 9780203884720. Retrieved 20 January 2014.
  89. ^ Green, Christopher. "Wrapped in a Fog: On the North Korean Constitution and the Ten Principles," Sino-NK, 5 June 2012. Retrieved 3 January 2016.
  90. ^ a b Hunter 1999, pp. 3–11.
  91. ^ Lankov 2007, p. 66.
  92. ^ a b c d e Lankov 2007, p. 67.
  93. ^ Lankov, Andrei (3 December 2012). "North Korea's new class system". Asia Times. Archived from the original on 3 December 2011. Retrieved 18 March 2014.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  94. ^ a b c Gause 2011, p. 147.
  95. ^ Staff writer 2014, p. 64.
  96. ^ Staff writer (10 May 2016). "New Party Central Auditing Commission inaugurated". North Korea Economy Watch. Retrieved 18 October 2017.
  97. ^ "The Central Committee". North Korean Leadership Watch. Retrieved 13 October 2017.
  98. ^ a b "Central Control Commission". North Korea Leadership Watch. 21 August 2010. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
  99. ^ Staff writer 2014, p. 66−67.
  100. ^ Buzo 1999, p. 30.
  101. ^ a b Kim 1982, p. 140.
  102. ^ "Korean People's Army". Retrieved 16 September 2019. The Korean People's Army is the "revolutionary armed wing" of the Worker's Party as stated in Article 46 of the party constitution, with first and foremost loyalties to the party.
  103. ^ Madden, Michael (18 October 2017). "The Party Roundup: Preliminary Look at North Korea's October 7 Central Committee Plenum". 38 North. Retrieved 18 October 2017.
  104. ^ Gause 2013, p. 35.
  105. ^ a b c Gause 2013, p. 36.
  106. ^ Staff writer 2014, p. 55.
  107. ^ a b Staff writer 2014, p. 69.
  108. ^ a b Cha & Hwang 2009, p. 202.
  109. ^ a b c d e Cha & Hwang 2009, p. 193.
  110. ^ a b c d Cha & Hwang 2009, p. 209.
  111. ^ Lankov, Kwak & Cho 2016, pp. 193–214, 309–310.
  112. ^ Lankov 2007, p. 36.
  113. ^ Cha & Hwang 2009, p. 210.
  114. ^ Myers 2011, pp. 9 & 11–12.
  115. ^ "13th International meeting of Communist and Workers' Parties in Athens". Act of Defiance. 29 November 2011. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
  116. ^ "13 IMCWP Resolution, Let us jointly commemorate the Birth Centenary of the Great Leader comrade President Kim Il Sung as a Grand Political Festival of the World's Humankind". 23 December 2011. Archived from the original on 11 September 2012. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
  117. ^ Cheong 2000, pp. 138–139.
  118. ^ a b c d e Cheong 2000, p. 139.
  119. ^ a b c So & Suh 2013, p. 107.
  120. ^ a b c Kwak 2009, p. 19.
  121. ^ Kwak 2009, p. 20.
  122. ^ Suh 1988, p. 302.
  123. ^ a b c Suh 1988, p. 309.
  124. ^ Suh 1988, pp. 309–310.
  125. ^ a b Suh 1988, p. 310.
  126. ^ Suh 1988, pp. 310–313.
  127. ^ Oh & Hassig 2000, p. 18.
  128. ^ a b Lee 2003, p. 105.
  129. ^ Lee 2003, pp. 105–106.
  130. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Lee 2003, p. 106.
  131. ^ a b c d Lee 2003, p. 107.
  132. ^ Lee 2003, p. 109.
  133. ^ a b Lee 2003, p. 111.
  134. ^ a b c d Cheong 2000, p. 140.
  135. ^ a b c d e f g h Cheong 2000, p. 141.
  136. ^ a b c d Cheong 2000, p. 142.
  137. ^ a b c d e Cheong 2000, p. 143.
  138. ^ Suh 1988, p. 313.
  139. ^ a b Rank, Michael (10 April 2012). "Lifting the cloak on North Korean secrecy: The Cleanest Race, How North Koreans See Themselves by B R Myers". Asia Times. Archived from the original on 12 April 2010. Retrieved 13 December 2012.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  140. ^ Staff writer (12 April 2010). "Immersion in propaganda, race-based nationalism and the un-figure-outable vortex of Juche Thought: Colin Marshall talks to B.R. Myers, author of The Cleanest Race: How North Koreans See Themselves and Why it Matters". Retrieved 13 April 2010.
  141. ^ Hitchens, Christopher (1 February 2010). "A Nation of Racist Dwarfs". Fighting Words. Slate. Retrieved 23 December 2012.


Articles, and journal entries[edit]


Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]