Yellow crazy ant
- There is also a different genus of ant called "crazy ants", Paratrechina.
|Yellow crazy ant|
F. Smith, 1857
The yellow crazy ant (Anoplolepis gracilipes) is a species of ant, introduced accidentally to northern Australia and Christmas Island in the Indian Ocean, that has caused ecological damage in both locations and is now found in the northern suburbs of Brisbane.
Like several other invasive ants, such as the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta), the big-headed ant (Pheidole megacephala), the little fire ant (Wasmannia auropunctata), and the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile), this is a "tramp ant", a species that easily becomes established and dominant in new habitat due to traits such as aggression toward other ant species, little aggression toward members of its own species, efficient recruitment, and large colony size. Also known as the long-legged ant or Maldive ant, it is on a list of "One Hundred of the World's Worst Invasive Species" formulated by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). It has invaded ecosystems from Hawaii to Seychelles, and formed supercolonies on Christmas Island in the Indian Ocean.
Anoplolepis gracilipes is a relatively large, yellow to orange ant with long legs, large eyes and extremely long antennal scapes.
Although A. gracilipes is the only invasive species in the genus Anoplolepis, there are several other genera that it can be mistaken for. Both Leptomyrmex and Oecophylla can be confused with Anoplolepis because of their similar sizes and very long limbs. Anoplolepis can be distinguished from Leptomyrmex by the presence of an acidopore. Anoplolepis can be distinguished from Oecophylla by the more compact petiole. Although both of these genera occur in the Pacific, neither contain any invasive species.
Several species of invasive ants belonging to the genera Camponotus and Paratrechina can appear similar to A. gracilipes. Although several invasive species of Pheidole can also be slender-bodied with long legs and long antennal scapes, they can be separated from A. gracilipes by their two-segmented waists.
A. gracilipes is widespread across the tropics, and populations are especially dense in the Pacific region. The species is most infamous for causing the ecological "meltdown" of Christmas Island. Although widespread across the Pacific, A. gracilipes can cause significant damage to native biological diversity, and strong quarantine measures are encouraged to keep it from spreading to new localities.
Geographical range and dispersal
The yellow crazy ant’s natural habitat is not known, but it has been speculated that the species originated in West Africa. It has been introduced into a wide range of tropical and subtropical environments including Caribbean islands, some Indian Ocean islands (Seychelles, Madagascar, Mauritius, Réunion, the Cocos Islands and the Christmas Islands) and some Pacific islands (New Caledonia, Hawaii, French Polynesia, Okinawa, Vanuatu, Micronesia and the Galapagos archipelago). The species has been known to occupy agricultural systems such as cinnamon, citrus, coffee and coconut plantations. Because the ant has generalized nesting habits, they are able to disperse via trucks, boats and other forms of human transport.
Crazy ant colonies naturally disperse through “budding”, i.e. when mated queens and workers leave the nest to establish a new one, and only rarely through flight via female winged reproductive forms. Generally, colonies that disperse through “budding” have a lower rate of dispersal and need human intervention to reach distant areas. It has been recorded that A. gracilipes moves as much as 400 m (1,300 ft) a year in Seychelles. A survey on Christmas Island, however, yielded an average spreading speed of three meters a day, the equivalent of one kilometre a year.
A. gracilipes has been described as a “scavenging predator” and has a broad diet, a characteristic of many invasive species. It consumes a wide variety of foods, including grains, seeds, arthropods, and decaying matter, including vertebrate corpses. They have been reported to attack and dismember invertebrates such as small isopods, myriapods, molluscs, arachnids, land crabs, earthworms and insects.
Like all ants, A. gracilipes requires a protein-rich food source for the queen to lay eggs and carbohydrates as energy for the workers. They get their carbohydrates from plant nectar and honeydew producing insects, especially scale insects, aphids, and other Sternorrhyncha. Studies indicate that crazy ants rely so much on the scale insects that scarcity of them can actually limit ant population growth.
Crazy ants get much of their food requirements from scale insects, serious plant pests that feed on sap of trees and release honeydew, a sugary liquid. Ants eat honeydew, and in return protect the scale from their enemies and spread them among trees, an example of mutualism. The honeydew not eaten by ants drips onto the trees and encourages the growth of sooty mold over the leaves and stems. This gives plants an ugly black appearance and reduces their health and vigour.
The ants protect the insects by "nannying" the mobile crawler stages and protecting them against their natural enemies. Experiments have shown that this connection is so strong that, in environments where A. gracilipes was removed, the density of scale insects dropped by 67% within 11 weeks, and to zero after 12 months.
Yellow crazy ants in Australia
Yellow crazy ants have been found at more than 30 sites in Queensland, and in Arnhem Land in the Northern Territory, where a large scattered population exists. A single New South Wales infestation has already been detected and eradicated, and in Western Australia crazy ants have been intercepted in shipping freight arriving at Fremantle.
Queensland’s main infestation is 830ha in and around Wet Tropics World Heritage listed rainforest. The Northern Territory infestation covers 2,500 square kilometres, an area larger than the Australian Capital Territory.
Climate modelling indicates yellow crazy ants could spread across Northern Australia from Queensland to Western Australia, across much of Queensland and into coastal and inland parts of NSW. Areas with the most ideal habitat and climatic conditions, such as Queensland’s Wet Tropics World Heritage rainforests, are likely to experience the highest impacts.
A cost benefit analysis by the Queensland government found that yellow crazy ants could cost Australia’s economy over $3 billion if the ants were not treated. This analysis did not take potential impacts on Australia's biodiversity into account. The known impacts of crazy ants in tropical rainforests overseas may provide useful insights into these impacts, bearing in mind that the most significant impacts are associated with relatively small islands, such as Christmas Island.
Impact on Christmas Island
The impact of crazy ants on the biodiversity of Christmas Island has been profound.
The crazy ant has a significant destructive impact on the island's ecosystem, killing and displacing crabs on the forest floor. The super-colonies also devastate crab numbers migrating to the coast. This has seen a rapid depletion in the number of land crabs, which are vital to Christmas Island's biodiversity - land crabs are a keystone species in the forest ecology: they dig burrows, turn over the soil, and fertilize it with their droppings.
Seedlings that were previously eaten by crabs started to grow and, as a result, changed the structure of the forest. Weeds also spread into the rainforest because there are no crabs to control them. One of the most noticeable changes in the forest is the increased numbers of the stinging tree Dendrocnide peltata, which now flourishes in many areas frequently visited by humans. The forest canopy also changed as the scale insects tended by yellow crazy ants multiplied and killed mature trees.
Robber crabs, red crabs, and blue crabs are completely wiped out from infested areas. Populations of other ground and canopy dwelling animals, such as reptiles and other leaf litter fauna, have also decreased. During crab migrations, many crabs move through areas infested with ants and are killed. Studies show that the ant has displaced an estimated 15-20 million crabs by occupying their burrows, killing and eating resident crabs, and using their burrows as nest sites. This factor has greatly depleted red crabs, and made their annual land migrations far more perilous.
Although crazy ants do not bite or sting, they spray formic acid as a defence mechanism and to subdue their prey. In areas of high ant density, the movement of a land crab disturbs the ants and, as a result, the ants instinctively spray formic acid as a form of defence. The high levels of formic acid at ground level eventually overwhelms the crabs, and they are usually blinded then eventually die from dehydration (while attempting to flush out the formic acid) and exhaustion. As the dead crabs decay, the protein becomes available to the ants.
In summary, crazy ants kill fauna, but encourage scale insects. Increased densities of scale insects cause forest die back, and even the death of large forest trees. These changes create a cascade of negative impacts, including weed invasion, significantly altering the forest landscape.
Christmas Island is a focal point for this international control effort. These supercolonies spread further and cause more damage than single colonies, and they pose the single greatest known threat to the island's biodiversity.
Staff from Christmas Island National Park have worked in recent years to keep ant numbers in check. With help from the Christmas Island Crazy Ant Scientific Advisory Panel and support from the Australian Government they are holding ground.
Another supercolony nearly devastated the bird fauna of Johnston Atoll in the northern Pacific. The single massive colony was found to occupy nearly a quarter of the island, with up to 1,000 queens in a plot of land 6 meters wide. The infestation is thought to have been eradicated.
To reduce the impacts of crazy ants on red crabs and Christmas Island's ecosystems the Parks Australia carried out a major aerial baiting program in 2009, to follow up the first aerial baiting conducted in 2002. The first step was conducting an extensive island-wide survey to determine the exact locations of the supercolonies. For several months, staff traversed the island surveying over 900 sites. The result was a map of crazy ant supercolonies and red crab burrow densities, together with other biodiversity data.
In September 2009, a helicopter was used to precisely bait crazy ant supercolonies, which covered 784 hectares of the island. A very low concentration of Fipronil bait (0.1%) was used to control the ants. Monthly monitoring of these baited supercolony sites shows that crazy ant densities were reduced by 99%.
Park staff placed a high emphasis on minimising non-target impact of baiting. Food lures were dropped from a helicopter to attract robber crabs away from areas that were about to be baited. This technique, combined with the low concentration Fipronil bait, proved to be highly successful with extremely low numbers of robber crabs and no red crabs known to be killed by the baiting.
While baiting has slowed the decline of the red crab, its effects on the crazy ant populations are only temporary, as escaping colonies invade the treated areas again, and it is expensive, requiring much man power. In an effort to find a better control, after research, Australian Parks in December 2016 imported Tachardiaephagus somervillei, a small (2mm) wasp and began breeding them for release. The wasp, which only attacks scale insects, is a voracious predator of what is believed to be one of the crazy ant's largest source of honey dew on Christmas Island, the yellow lac scale insect.
Researchers from La Trobe University in Melbourne, funded by Parks Australia, began looking for biological controls in 2009. While the ants are omnivores, studies have shown honey dew is an important part of the diet of Christmas Island crazy ants. Samples of ants taken from colonies that are growing rapidly have more honey dew in their diet than when the colonies decline. Further, restricting access to honey dew, by binding trees where the scale insects feed, dramatically reduced the colony as ant activity on the ground fell by 95% in just four weeks. In the laboratory, colonies with limited sources of sugar were compared to colonies with access to abundant sugar. Those with abundant sugar had more fertile queens and lower death rates among workers. The workers were also more aggressive toward other ant species and explored their environments more. This is believed to show why the ants decline when deprived access to scale insects in the field, and confirm reduced honey dew will greatly reduce the ants ability to form super colonies.
While controlling the yellow lac scale insect is expected to control the yellow crazy ant on Christmas Island, on mainland Australia it is thought this would not help. There are at least a dozen honey dew producing insects as well as extrafloral nectar from native acacia trees all of which fuel yellow crazy ants.
Experts continue to call for a fully funded, long term baiting program on mainland Australia.
- Anoplolepis gracilipes. Global Invasive Species Database. ISSG.
- "Pests and Diseases Image Library: Anoplolepis gracilipes".
- Kirschenbaum, R. and J. K. Grace. (2008). Agonistic responses of the tramp ants Anoplolepis gracilipes, Pheidole megacephala, Linepithema humile, and Wasmannia auropunctata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 51(3), 673-84.
- One Hundred of the World's Worst Invasive Alien Species. Global Invasive Species Database. Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG), IUCN Species Survival Commission.
- O'Dowd, D. J., et al. (2003). Invasional ‘meltdown’ on an oceanic island. Ecology Letters 6(9), 812-17.
- Holoway D.A., David A.; Lach, Lori; Suarez, Andrew V.; Tsutsui, Neil D.; Case, Ted J. (2002). "The causes and consequences of ant invasions". Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 33: 181–233. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150444.
- McGlynn T.P., Terrence P. (1999). "The Worldwide Transfer of Ants: Geographical Distribution and Ecological Invasions". Journal of Biogeography. 26 (3): 535–548. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.1999.00310.x.
- O’Dowd D.J. (1999). "Crazy Ant Attack". Wingspan. 9 (2): 7.
- Ness, J.H.; Bronstein, J.L.; et al. (2004). "The Effects of Invasive Ants on Prospective ant Mutualists". Biological Invasions. 6 (4): 445–461. doi:10.1023/B:BINV.0000041556.88920.dd.
- Abbott, Kirsti L.; Green, Peter T.; et al. (2007). "Collapse of an ant-scale mutualism in a rainforest on Christmas Island". Oikos. 116 (7): 1238–1246. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15629.x.
- Invasive Species Council; April 2016; “Yellow Crazy Ants In Australia”, Invasive Species Council Fact Sheet; https://invasives.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/fs-yellow-crazy-ants.pdf; Retrieved: 2017-03-10.
- Csurhes, Steve and Hankamer, Clare; 2012 (updated 2016); “Invasive Animal Risk Assessment Yellow Crazy Ant”; Queensland Government of Australia; https://www.daf.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/63372/IPA-Yellow-Crazy-Ant-Risk-Assessment.pdf; Retrieved 2017-03-17.
- Invasive Species Council; April 2016; “Yellow Crazy Ants In Australia”, Invasive Species Council Fact Sheet; https://invasives.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/fs-yellow-crazy-ants.pdf. Retrieved: 2017-03-07.
- Csurhes, Steve and Hankamer, Clare; 2012 (updated 2016); “Invasive Animal Risk Assessment Yellow Crazy Ant”; Queensland Government of Australia; https://www.daf.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/63372/IPA-Yellow-Crazy-Ant-Risk-Assessment.pdf; Retrieved 2017-03-10.
- Csurhes, Steve and Hankamer, Clare; 2012 (updated 2016); “Invasive Animal Risk Assessment Yellow Crazy Ant”; Queensland Government of Australia; https://www.daf.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/63372/IPA-Yellow-Crazy-Ant-Risk-Assessment.pdf; Retrieved 2017-03-16
- Hoskin, Conrad and Lach, Lori; Spring 2015; “Too much to lose: Yellow crazy ants in the wet tropics”; Wildlife Australia; Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 37-41; ISSN 0043-5481. http://www.wettropics.gov.au/site/user-assets/docs/yellow-crazy-ants-lach--hoskin-spring-2015.pdf; Retrieved 2017-03-15.
- Hoskin, Conrad and Lach, Lori; Spring 2015; “Too much to lose: Yellow crazy ants in the wet tropics”; Wildlife Australia; Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 37-41; ISSN 0043-5481. http://www.wettropics.gov.au/site/user-assets/docs/yellow-crazy-ants-lach--hoskin-spring-2015.pdf; Retrieved 2017-03-10.
- Parks Australia; 2017; https://parksaustralia.gov.au/christmas/people-place/red-crabs.html; Retrieved 2017-16-03
- Davis, Naomi; O’Dowd, Dennis; Green, Peter; MacNally, Ralf; 15 July 2008; "Effects of an Alien Ant Invasion on Abundance, Behaviour, and Reproductive Success of Endemic Island Birds" Conservation Biology Journal; Society for Conservation Biology
- Hoskin, Conrad and Lach, Lori; Spring 2015; “Too much to lose: Yellow crazy ants in the wet tropics”; Wildlife Australia; Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 37-41; ISSN 0043-5481. http://www.wettropics.gov.au/site/user-assets/docs/yellow-crazy-ants-lach--hoskin-spring-2015.pdf; Retrieved 2017-03-10
- "Christmas Island Yellow Crazy Ant Control Program" (PDF). Retrieved 2016-09-20.
- "The Christmas Crab Massacre". Retrieved 2016-09-20.
- Hoskin, Conrad and Lach, Lori; Spring 2015; “Too much to lose: Yellow crazy ants in the wet tropics”; Wildlife Australia; Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 37-41; ISSN 0043-5481. http://www.wettropics.gov.au/site/user-assets/docs/yellow-crazy-ants-lach--hoskin-spring-2015.pdf; Retrieved 2017-03-5.
- Strike Team Vanquishes Crazy Ants at Johnston. Environment Hawaii Newsletter, September 2012.
-  Yellow crazy ant biological control arrives on Christmas Island
-  La Torbe University: The wasp saving Christmas Island's crabs
-  Parks Australia: Christmas Island Yellow Crazy Ant Control Program
- Bateman, Daniel; May 20, 2016; “Federal funds finally found to combat yellow crazy ants in Far North Queensland”; The Cairns Post; http://www.cairnspost.com.au/news/cairns/federal-funds-finally-found-to-combat-yellow-crazy-ants-in-far-north-queensland/news-story/. Retrieved 2017-03-24.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Anoplolepis gracilipes.|