|Captive pair at Bird Kingdom, Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada|
The zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) is the most common estrildid finch of Central Australia and ranges over most of the continent, avoiding only the cool moist south and some areas of the tropical far north. It can also be found natively in Indonesia and East Timor. The bird has been introduced to Puerto Rico and Portugal.
Taxonomy and phylogeny
The zebra finch was first collected in 1801 during Nicolas Baudin's expedition to Australia. It was described in 1817 by Louis Jean Pierre Vieillot in his Nouveau Dictionnaire d'Histoire Naturelle, where he gave it the scientific name Fringilla guttata. The Australian subspecies was then described in 1837 by John Gould as Amadina castanotis. Its current genus, Taeniopygia, was described in 1862 by Ludwig Reichenbach. It is placed in the tribe Poephilini, along with the genus Poephila, which it was previously included in; the split between Taeniopygia and Poephila is justified by 1987 study using protein electrophoresis and chromosomal banding.
There are two subspecies of the zebra finch:
- Taeniopygia guttata guttata, the Timor zebra finch, extends from Lombok in the Lesser Sunda Islands or Nusa Tenggara in Indonesia to Sermata, in addition to coastal areas around the continent of Australia.
- Taeniopygia guttata castanotis is found over the wide range of continental Australia; it is sometimes split as the Australian zebra finch.
The zebra finch likely evolved in Australia, with either northern or southeastern Australia postulated as two places where the genus arose. The present-day distribution of the subspecies T. g. guttata is likely due to a Pleistocene glaciation event where the sea level dropped between about 100 and 150 metres (330 and 490 ft), putting the coasts of Timor and Australia closer. This allowed birds swept out to sea by cyclones to see mountains near the west coast of Timor, which prompted them to make landfall on the island.
The morphological differences between the subspecies include differences in size. T. g. guttata is smaller than T. g. castanotis. In addition, the T. g. guttata males do not have the fine barring found on the throat and upper breast and have smaller breast bands.
Habitat and distribution
The zebra finch has the most extensive mainland distribution of the Australian estrilids, being found in about 75% of mainland Australia, as the subspecies Taeniopygia guttata castanotis. This subspecies is generally not found on the coasts, except for the arid western edge. As the subspecies T. g. guttata, it is distributed from the islands Lombok and Sumbawa in the Lesser Sundas east to Luang and Sermata, and south to Sumba, Sawu, Dao, Roti, Semau, and Timor.
The zebra finch (or at the very least, the subspecies T. g. castanotis) is generally found in more arid areas. The areas it chooses to occupy are close to water, and places where rain is concentrated after it falls. However, this is likely more related to the abundance of vegetation than the abundance of water as a resource in itself.. Within these areas, it is found in grasslands with scattered trees and shrubs, and in open or grassy woodlands. It is also found in cultivated areas, such as rice fields It usually stays confined to the low coastal areas of the islands it inhabits, but it can move to elevations up to 2,300 metres (7,500 ft) to exploit expanding cultivation and grasslands.
Although zebra finch breeding, for example, is initiated by rainfall, Klaus Immelmann proposed that sustained heavy precipitation is detrimental to the zebra finch. This is supported by the observation that the nest does not shield the chicks or eggs from rain, and rainfall can sometimes result in clutches being abandoned. Furthermore, it is supported by Immelmann's finding that zebra finches left Wyndham after the first heavy rains in November 1959, but returned to breed in April. It is hypothesized that birds in parts of northern Australia migrate inland during the wet season from October to May, and return to the coastal regions during the dryer months.
The life expectancy of a zebra finch is highly variable because of genetic and environmental factors. The zebra finch may reach up to five years in its natural environment. If they are kept caged, they normally live for 5 to 9 years but may live as long as 12 years, with an exceptional case of 14.5 years reported for a caged specimen. The greatest threats to zebra finch survival are predation by cats and loss of natural food.
Song and other vocalizations
Zebra finches are loud and boisterous singers. Their calls can be a loud beep, meep, oi! or a-ha!. Their song is a few small beeps, leading up to a rhythmic song of varying complexity in males. Each male's song is different, although birds of the same bloodline will exhibit similarities, and all finches will overlay their own uniqueness onto a common rhythmic framework. Sons generally learn the song of their fathers with little variation. There is a critical sensitive period during which juvenile males learn their songs by imitating a mature, male tutor. Subsong (early, poorly structured vocalizations) evolve into 'plastic song'. This plastic song is variable between renditions but begins to incorporate some recognizable elements of tutor songs. A study conducted by Nottebohm et al., has shown that birds were able to successfully imitate their tutor’s song after relatively short exposure (40 playbacks of the motifs lasting 30 seconds total) over the duration of their sensitive learning period. These birds eventually form a “template” of what their correct song should sound like. They rely on auditory feedback for both song learning and practice as juveniles and song maintenance as adults. Adult birds maintain their songs by correcting any deviations from their target song template. During adulthood, by around 90 days, the bird's song goes through a crystallization phase where their song template is stable and it no longer changes.
Male zebra finches begin to sing at puberty, while females lack a singing ability. This is due to a developmental difference, where in the embryo, the male zebra finch produces testosterone, which is transformed into estradiol in the brain, which in turn leads to the development of the nervous system for a song system. There are multiple areas of the brain involved in the production of song. When a bird is singing a learned song, the HVC projects to the robust nucleus of the archistriatum (RA), which itself projects to the hypoglossal motoneurons. These motoneurons control the muscles of the trachea and syrinx. When learning a new song, the HVC sends efferents to Area X in the lobus parolfactorius, which connects to the medial nucleus of the dorsolateral thalamus (DLM). This structure connects to the lateral magnocellular nucleus of the anterior neostriatum (LMAN), which projects to the RA, and continues like a normal learned song would. The function of the various areas involved in learning is still being investigated. Area X is likely involved in the acquisition of a new song, whereas the LMAN likely serves a key role in the plasticity necessary for learning. Activation of song behavior later depends on androgens.
Because zebra finch males learn their songs from their surroundings, they are often used as avian model organisms to investigate the neural bases of learning, memory, and sensorimotor integration. For example, studies have investigated the role of FoxP2 in song learning and have found that in young finches both knockdown and overexpression of FoxP2 in the striatal song control nucleus, Area X, prevents accurate song learning and tutor imitation. These studies also have implications for human speech. Individuals heterozygous for a point mutation in FOXP2 manifest a speech disorder. Because of similar expression patterns between humans and songbirds, the zebra finch is used as a model to study FoxP2 expression and function. The zebra finch genome was the second bird genome to be sequenced, in 2008, after that of the chicken.
The zebra finch uses an acoustic signal to communicate to embryos. It gives an incubation call to its eggs when the weather is hot—above 26 °C (79 °F)—and when the end of their incubation period is near. This call alters the growth and behaviour of the chicks, with chicks that were given an incubation call having less mass at the end of the nestling phase when they experienced higher nest temperatures. This contrasts with chicks that were not given an incubation call, which have a higher mass at the end of nestling after being exposed to high nest temperatures. Additionally, the chicks called to as an embryo are more likely to call after experiencing high nest temperatures.
Calling behaviour is used by zebra finches to negotiate parental care duties. In an experiment that delayed the return of the males to the nest, it was found that the resulting duets were shorter and calls were made more often. This is the first species that vocal negotiation over parental care has ever been reported.
The zebra finch generally breeds in loose colonies of up to 50 nests (although the number of individuals in a colony can be up to about 230 when breeding, and around 350 when not), but it may nest solitarily. It often does not breed in the colony it was born; of the ringed birds that bred in the Danaher breeding colony ( ) from 1985 to 1989, 24% of them were hatched from the colony or in the immediate vicinity. Additionally, natal dispersal is not sex-biased, unlike in most passerines. However, males between 36 and 50 days of age are more likely to disperse than females, although after this age, more females disperse than males. Predation is likely a major factor in coloniality; nests in the main colony suffer less predation than nests further away. Pairs with preyed-upon nests are significantly more likely to nest in a bush more than 20 metres (66 ft) away from their previous nesting plant. Another large factor is where others nest: individuals are more likely to nest closer to conspecifics. In addition, reproductive success of conspecifics may play a role in where individuals nest; a study published in 2012 found that this finch was more likely to breed near nests with chicks older than six days (used as a proxy for reproductive success because they fledge about 87% of the time). The zebra finch usually places its nest in a thorny shrub or tree, although it will nest in other structures, natural and artificial. Often, there are multiple nests in one shrub.
The zebra finch builds both a roosting and breeding nest. The former is dome-shaped and has a large entrance on the side. This contrasts with the small entrance that conceals the inside of the latter nest. The breeding nest is also lined with soft material, such as wool and feathers. Both sites are defended during the day; however, while a desperate bird is sometimes let in to the roosting nest during the night, the breeding nest is always guarded.
The zebra finch is an opportunistic breeder, initiating reproductive behaviour about one to three months after water becomes available. This is so that the young hatch when semi-ripe and ripe seeds (their primary food) become available. This finding is in line with the food quality hypothesis of zebra finch breeding, which states that dry grass seed is inadequate as a food source for nestlings, and that higher quality food (like ripening seeds) is needed to sustain them. Thus, in captivity, it can breed year round when provided with sufficient water, and it may attempt to breed several times per breeding season. Zebra finches form socially monogamous pair bonds that remain stable for at least the duration of raising a clutch, but can last for up to several years. Extra-pair copulation, mating with individuals other than one's mate, occurs occasionally, with females usually soliciting it. Extra-pair parentage is relatively rare in the wild, accounting for about 2% of young. Attempts at forced extra-pair copulations by males occur frequently (about 43.8% of the time in one study); but, females can always successfully resist forced copulations if they so choose.
There are multiple hypotheses as to why extra-pair copulation might have evolved. One theory is the good genes theory, which states that a female chooses extra-pair copulation if the extra-pair male grants its offspring direct benefits as a result of the male's alleles. There are results that seem to support this; a 1992 study found a correlation between the song rate of a male and the attractiveness of it (measured on the basis of how much time the female spent with the male). However, a 2007 study found that the responsiveness of a female (measured by behaviours indicating an intent to copulate or rejection) was not significantly related to the male's beak colour or its song rate. Song rate was instead hypothesized to draw female's attention to males. According to the author, this meant that the validity of the conclusions of the 1992 experiment needed to be reexamined. Combined with the lack of influence that certain morphological traits have, the large control of females over copulation could indicate chase-away sexual selection, where an exaggerated trait is evolved to counter increased resistance by the female to that feature. An additional theory as to why extra-pair copulation might evolve is the between-sex genetic correlation theory. This theory is based on the lack of definite female benefits in extra-pair copulations, and the benefits that males have by being promiscuous. It states that extra-pair mating behaviour could arise from the same set of loci, and thus that strong selection for extra-pair mating behaviour would indirectly select for promiscuous behaviour in females.
There are several traits correlated with increased extra-pair copulations. Spending time with a mate is important; even more important than the attractiveness of a male (as judged by other females; attractiveness as judged by one female was positively correlated with the judgements of other females). Symmetry of both plumage, like chest bands, and artificial features, like leg bands, are preferred by the female, as measured by how often the male is displayed to. Because of the prevalence of extra-pair paternity, males have evolved various mechanisms to try and assure their paternity of a clutch. The male guards its mate by following it and stopping extra-pair copulation attempts. Sperm competition, where two or more males attempt to inseminate a single egg, also occurs. This is indicated by the male in a pair copulating with its mate more often the day before egg-starts. This is because the last male to copulate with a female before the next egg has a 70% to 80% chance of fertilizing the egg in question. Another adaptation to sperm competition is the male ejaculating up to seven times more sperm in extra-pair copulations. The increased amount of sperm occurs because of the combination of ejaculate size being controlled by the time between previous copulations, and the fact that extra-pair copulations occur in the male after its period of within-pair copulation period is complete.
The number of eggs ranges from two to eight eggs per clutch, with five being the most common number. These eggs are white or pale greyish blue in colour, and have a size of about 16 by 10 millimetres (0.63 by 0.39 in). They are incubated for 14 to 16 days. From about 5% to 11% of offspring are the result of intraspecific brood parasitism, and in cases of parasitism, there is usually only one parasitic egg per nest. Additionally, parasitized nests often have one more egg than non-parasitized nests. The female may follow a mixed strategy with relation to brood parasitism (being parasitic in addition to incubating its own clutch). From about 32% to 58% of females do this, and almost all (about 96%) lay parasitic eggs before incubating their clutch. Unpaired females sometimes lay parasitic eggs, but paired females do not rely solely on parasitism. A female that parasitized a nest in the past is more likely to do so in the future. Most of these eggs are unsuccessful; that is, the host abandons its otherwise empty nest after a parasitic egg is laid. Additionally, successful parasites are more likely to have future success from parasitism. At least during late incubation, the female zebra finch can distinguish its own eggs on the basis of odour. This method of distinction arises from the visual similarity between parasitic and non-parasitic eggs, and the cost associated with raising an egg other than one's own. When a bird is parasitized during a nesting attempt, it is less likely to be parasitized again during that season and, at the very least, during the next season (although this could be statistical noise).
Young zebra finches fledge about 17 to 18 days after hatching. They feed themselves by around 35 days after hatching, although they are still socially dependent on their parents during this time; the young become socially dependent between 36 and 50 days after hatching. They also develop sexually dimorphic plumage during this period. Birds first attempt to form pair bonds and breed when they get close to 80 days in age. 80 days after hatching, most birds can breed.
Males and females are very similar in size, but are easily distinguished from one another after reaching maturity, as the males usually have bright orange cheek feathers, red beaks (as opposed to the orange beaks of females), and generally more striking black and white patterns.
Inbreeding causes early death (inbreeding depression) in the zebra finch, although it does not seem to affect fertility. Embryos have a much lower survival rate, with a study finding fertile eggs from sibling pairs had only about a 25% survival rate, compared to about 41% for unrelated pairs. This early difference in survival eventually becomes null after fledging, with about equal survival rates for offspring from both sibling and unrelated pairs. Inbreeding depression mostly arises due to the expression of deleterious recessive alleles.
The zebra finch is primarily eats grass seeds, feeding mostly on semi-ripe and ripe seeds (although it also takes dry seeds). The seeds are all dehusked, and are found on stems and the ground, with most being taken, at least in the nominate subspecies, from the latter. The grasses they are taken from are commonly between about 1 and 2.6 millimetres (0.039 and 0.102 in) in length, and larger and easily dehusked seeds are preferred. It supplements its diet with insects (mainly ants and termites) caught in short flights from lookout perches, in addition to flowers of the genus Chenopodium. The nestlings diet consists almost entirely of half-ripe and ripe seeds, in addition to green plant material. There are two main reasons why grass seeds are the dietary staple of the zebra finch: they are an abundant and relatively stable food source in this finch's preferred climate, and they are convenient to, for example, dehusk. In some areas, such as the eastern arid zone in Australia, the seeds taken are consistent, whereas in others, like northern Victoria, there are annual changes in the diet, as different species become abundant. The diet of this finch is generally low in species diversity; at Sandringham, Queensland 74% of the seeds eaten over a 15 month period were from Panicum decompositum, for example.
The zebra finch generally forages for seeds on the ground, taking them individually. But, it also eats seeds on the heads of standing grass. To do this, it either flies and pecks out seeds one at a time, or it perches on a nearby branch. It may also take the head to the ground by jumping up and seizing it with its bill or feet. In times of scarcity, the zebra finch can use its bill to dig into the ground to find buried seed. These seeds are generally taken from patches which have fewer husks (when compared to the number of whole seeds) and are larger and more dense. A seed patch may be checked for many months after its supply of seed is depleted. Additionally, colonial roosting and nesting and foraging in flocks can help birds discover new patches of seed.
This bird commonly forages in flocks, although it sometimes forages in pairs or by itself. In the breeding season, small or medium sized flocks are common, but in the non-breeding season, flocks of up to about 500 birds may be formed. It occasionally forms mixed-species flocks with other estrildids. A feeding flock can be formed by individuals joining those already feeding, or by individuals landing on the ground together. Birds that arrive in this flock later are more likely to rely on scrounging, or taking food from competitors, whereas early arrivals are more likely to find food for themselves. Individuals that tend to explore more may be more dominant (measured by factors such as in what order individuals accessed a food source), at least in a study that had relatively low food availability and a single source where food could be taken from. These individuals may also be less successful in a scramble competition, where there are multiple points where food can be found. The reason for the latter is hypothesized to be a result of a trade-off between faster speed in sampling an area and lower accuracy in detecting seeds.
Foraging activity in the zebra finch peaks in the first hour after sunrise and the second to last hour before sunset. In the first instance, the increase foraging is generally achieved through many short bouts of foraging, whereas the latter comes from a few long bouts. When food becomes less available, like from August to September in northern Victoria, there is more feeding in the afternoon, less time spent on patches of food before leaving, and the distance between places where food is available is longer. There are generally two groups of individuals based on foraging behaviour. In the first group, the probability of starting or stopping a feeding bout is constant through time, and short meals are more usual. Most birds in this group have longer bouts when the gap between the previous bout is longer. In the second group (which may consist of more birds), the longer a gap is, the more likely the individual is to start feeding again. Additionally, for most birds in this group, the same is true of the stopping of a bout; the longer it is, the more likely it is to be stopped. Feeding is also usually cyclical for the second group.
Drinking and bathing
The zebra finch generally consumes about 24% to 28% of its body weight (or about 3 millilitres (0.11 imp fl oz; 0.10 US fl oz)) in water per day at a temperature of 22 to 23 °C (72 to 73 °F). When at a higher temperature of 40 °C (104 °F), it may drink from 6 to 12 millilitres (0.21 to 0.42 imp fl oz; 0.20 to 0.41 US fl oz) of water per day. The zebra finch also extracts water from seeds, and can get water from metabolizing its food. This metabolic water consumption can equal the amount of water that is lost when temperatures are below 23 °C (73 °F), although only for birds that are gradually dehydrated. Suddenly dehydrated birds must be in temperatures below 12 °C (54 °F) before the water lost is equal to that produced by the metabolism. This finch can survive periods of low water consumption; one study that gradually reduced the amount of water given over a period of a few months to just 0.5 to 1 millilitre (0.018 to 0.035 imp fl oz; 0.017 to 0.034 US fl oz) per week at temperatures from 22 to 24 °C (72 to 75 °F) found that the zebra finch could survive these conditions. Additionally, more than half of birds survived in a total water deprivation experiment that ran 513 days long.
When water is close, the zebra finch drinks regularly during the day; if it is over about 5 kilometres (3.1 mi) away, visits generally peak at midday. It prefers to drink from small puddles or other collections of water, especially those with gently sloped banks. Additionally, exposed drinking areas are preferred to more enclosed ones. It can also drink from dew on the tip of leaves. Due to the danger of predation, the zebra finch gathers in flocks in a bush or tree near a waterhole, only going to drink after the group is large enough. It then only drinks for a few seconds. After drinking, the zebra finch generally bathes for around a minute. Then, it dries off and re-oils its plumage in a warm sheltered spot.
The zebra finch only needs an average of 3.6 seconds to drink 1.5 millilitres (0.053 imp fl oz; 0.051 US fl oz) of water. This short amount of time per bout is achieved by this finch's drinking method. It swallows the water it gets while its bill tip is still submerged, unlike most birds that bring their bill tip up to swallow. This unique action is accomplished by having the tongue scoop water into the pharynx. Then, the front of the larynx forces the water into the oesophagus, which, through peristalsis, takes the fluid to the crop. This method could have evolved because the adaptations necessary were already there because of the need to quickly dehusk and swallow seeds. It allows for water to be drunk faster and taken from more diverse sources, such as drops of dew and cattle troughs; the latter requires the bird to drink upside down.
The body temperature (as measured from the ) of the zebra finch may vary from 38 to 44 °C (100 to 111 °F), rising with increasing air temperatures. Body temperatures over 45 °C (113 °F) can cause death within an hour. This finch first cools itself by covering its plumage with water, not moving, and holding its wings out to allow more thinly feathered regions to be exposed. It also has a large capacity for evaporative cooling through the lungs and skin, with measurements of heat lost through evaporative cooling over heat produced being as high as 1.37 at 43.4 °C (110.1 °F). This can occur as a result of panting, which starts to occur when body temperatures reach 42 to 43 °C (108 to 109 °F) (although this may start when the air temperature is as low as 32 °C (90 °F)). This can cause dehydration and may put birds into a lethargic state. Additionally, the zebra finch's simple rete mirabile ophthalmicum (found in the head) makes it unable to cool the brain as effectively as other birds, like the common kestrel. This lacking ability to cool the brain, in combination with dehydration, may cause the mass die-offs found during prolonged periods of high temperatures. For example, in January 1932, temperatures were between 47 and 52 °C (117 and 126 °F) for 16 days in northern Southern Australia, causing upwards of tens of thousands of this bird to die, with many being found in dams.
Nest predators of the zebra finch include the tiger snake, brown snake, dragon lizard, pygmy mulga monitor, singing honeyeater, grey-crowned babbler, yellow-throated miner, little crow, Torresian crow, black rat, and house mouse. Canivorous marsupials are also nest predators, and barn owls take roosting adult zebra finches.
- BirdLife International (2016). "Taeniopygia guttata". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2017.3. International Union for Conservation of Nature. Retrieved 16 April 2018.
- Clayton, N.S.; Birkhead, T. (1989). "Consistency in the Scientific Name of the Zebra Finch" (PDF). Auk. 106: 750–750.
- Zann 1996, pp. xiii–xiv
- Reichenbach, H. G. Ludwig (1862). Die Singvögel als Fortsetzung der vollständigsten Naturgeschichte und zugleich als Central-Atlas für zoologische Gärten und für Thierfreunde (in German). Dresden and Leipzig. p. 26.
- Zann 1996, p. 5
- Christidis, L. (1987). "Biochemical systematics within palaeotropic finches (Aves: Estrildidae)". The Auk. 104 (3): 380–392. doi:10.2307/4087534. ISSN 0004-8038.
- Christidis, L. (1987). "Phylogeny and Systematics of Estrildine Finches and Their Relationships to Other Seed-eating Passerines". Emu - Austral Ornithology. 87 (2): 119–123. doi:10.1071/MU9870119. ISSN 0158-4197.
- Payne, R. (2018). del Hoyo, Josep; Elliott, Andrew; Sargatal, Jordi; Christie, David A.; de Juana, Eduardo, eds. "Australian Zebra Finch (Taeniopygia castanotis)". Handbook of the Birds of the World Alive. Barcelona, Spain: Lynx Edicions. Retrieved 5 August 2018. (Subscription required (help)).
- Zann 1996, pp. 9–10
- Payne, R. (2018). del Hoyo, Josep; Elliott, Andrew; Sargatal, Jordi; Christie, David A.; de Juana, Eduardo, eds. "Timor Zebra Finch (Taeniopygia guttata)". Handbook of the Birds of the World Alive. Barcelona, Spain: Lynx Edicions. Retrieved 5 August 2018. (Subscription required (help)).
- Zann 1996, p. 19
- Zann 1996, p. 23
- Zann 1996, p. 62–68
- Zann 1996, p. 27
- Zann 1996, p. 17
- Zann, Richard A.; Morton, Stephen R.; Jones, Kevin R.; Burley, Nancy T. (1995). "The timing of breeding by zebra finches in relation to rainfall in central Australia". Emu - Austral Ornithology. 95 (3): 208–222. doi:10.1071/MU9950208. ISSN 0158-4197.
- Zann 1996, p. 25
- White, R. & Fraser, A. (2007). "Taeniopygia guttata". Animal Diversity Web. University of Michigan. Retrieved 22 July 2009.
- "AnAge entry for Taeniopygia guttata". Genomics.senescence.info. Retrieved 25 January 2011.
- Haddon, Frank (1985). The Golden Book of Australian birds and mammals. Illustrated by Tony Oliver. Golden Press. p. 44. ISBN 0-7302-0011-6.
- Brainard, Michael S.; Doupe, Allison J. (16 May 2002). "What songbirds teach us about learning". Nature. 417 (6886): 351–358. doi:10.1038/417351a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 12015616.
- Tchernichovski, Ofer; Lints, Thierry; Mitra, Partha P.; Nottebohm, Fernando (26 October 1999). "Vocal imitation in zebra finches is inversely related to model abundance". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 96 (22): 12901–12904. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.22.12901. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 23154. PMID 10536020.
- Gahr, M; Konishi, M. (1988). "Developmental changes in estrogen-sensitive neurons in the forebrain of the zebra finch" (PDF). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 85 (19): 7380–7383. doi:10.1073/pnas.85.19.7380.
- Scharff, C; Nottebohm, F (1991). "A comparative study of the behavioral deficits following lesions of various parts of the zebra finch song system: implications for vocal learning". The Journal of Neuroscience. 11 (9): 2896–2913. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.11-09-02896.1991. ISSN 0270-6474.
- Sohrabji, Farida; Nordeen, Ernest J.; Nordeen, Kathy W. (1990). "Selective impairment of song learning following lesions of a forebrain nucleus in the juvenile zebra finch". Behavioral and Neural Biology. 53 (1): 51–63. doi:10.1016/0163-1047(90)90797-A. ISSN 0163-1047.
- Gurney, ME; Konishi, M. (1980). "Hormone-induced sexual differentiation of brain and behavior in zebra finches". Science. 208: 1380–1383. doi:10.1126/science.208.4450.1380. PMID 17775725.
- Haesler, Sebastian; Rochefort, Christelle; Georgi, Benjamin; Licznerski, Pawel; Osten, Pavel; Scharff, Constance (4 December 2007). "Incomplete and Inaccurate Vocal Imitation after Knockdown of FoxP2 in Songbird Basal Ganglia Nucleus Area X". PLOS Biology. 5 (12): e321. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050321. ISSN 1545-7885. PMC 2100148. PMID 18052609.
- Heston, Jonathan B.; White, Stephanie A. (18 February 2015). "Behavior-linked FoxP2 regulation enables zebra finch vocal learning". The Journal of Neuroscience. 35 (7): 2885–2894. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3715-14.2015. ISSN 1529-2401. PMC 4331621. PMID 25698728.
- Lai, Cecilia S. L.; Fisher, Simon E.; Hurst, Jane A.; Vargha-Khadem, Faraneh; Monaco, Anthony P. (4 October 2001). "A forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder". Nature. 413 (6855): 519–523. doi:10.1038/35097076. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11586359.
- Teramitsu, Ikuko; Kudo, Lili C.; London, Sarah E.; Geschwind, Daniel H.; White, Stephanie A. (31 March 2004). "Parallel FoxP1 and FoxP2 Expression in Songbird and Human Brain Predicts Functional Interaction". Journal of Neuroscience. 24 (13): 3152–3163. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5589-03.2004. ISSN 0270-6474. PMID 15056695.
- Taeniopygia guttata Research Status. Washington University in St. Louis
- Mariette, Mylene M.; Buchanan, Katherine L. (2016). "Prenatal acoustic communication programs offspring for high posthatching temperatures in a songbird". Science. 353 (6301): 812–814. doi:10.1126/science.aaf7049.
- Boucaud, Ingrid CA; Mariette, Mylene M.; Villain, Avelyne S.; Vignal, Clémentine (February 2016). "Vocal negotiation over parental care? Acoustic communication at the nest predicts partners' incubation share". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 117 (2): 322–336. doi:10.1111/bij.12705.
- Izaac, Joshua (2 December 2015). "Zebra finches negotiate parental duties through song". Australian Geographic. Retrieved 5 October 2017.
- Zann, Richard; Runciman, David (2008). "Survivorship, dispersal and sex ratios of zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata in southeast Australia". Ibis. 136 (2): 136–143. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1994.tb01077.x. ISSN 0019-1019.
- Zann 1996, p. 76
- Mariette, Mylene M.; Griffith, Simon C. (2012). "Conspecific attraction and nest site selection in a nomadic species, the zebra finch". Oikos. 121 (6): 823–834. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.20014.x. ISSN 0030-1299.
- Kikkawa, Jiro (1980). "Seasonality of nesting by zebra finches at Armidale, NSW". Emu - Austral Ornithology. 80 (1): 13–20. doi:10.1071/MU9800013. ISSN 0158-4197.
- Zann 1996, p. 73
- Hauber, Mark E. (1 August 2014). The Book of Eggs: A Life-Size Guide to the Eggs of Six Hundred of the World's Bird Species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 640. ISBN 978-0-226-05781-1.
- Schielzeth, Holger; Bolund, Elisabeth (2010). "Patterns of conspecific brood parasitism in zebra finches". Animal Behaviour. 79 (6): 1329–1337. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.03.006. ISSN 0003-3472.
- Houtman, Anne M. (22 July 1992). "Female Zebra Finches Choose Extra-Pair Copulations with Genetically Attractive Males". Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 249 (1324). doi:10.1098/rspb.1992.0075.
- Griffith, Simon C.; Holleley, Clare E.; Mariette, Mylene M.; Pryke, Sarah R.; Svedin, Nina (2010). "Low level of extrapair parentage in wild zebra finches". Animal Behaviour. 79 (2): 261–264. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.11.031. ISSN 0003-3472.
- Birkhead, T. R.; Burke, T.; Zann, R.; Hunter, F. M.; Krupa, A. P. (1990). "Extra-pair paternity and intraspecific brood parasitism in wild zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata, revealed by DNA fingerprinting". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 27 (5): 315–324. doi:10.1007/BF00164002. ISSN 0340-5443.
- Forstmeier, Wolfgang (2007). "Do individual females differ intrinsically in their propensity to engage in extra-pair copulations?". PLoS ONE. 2 (9): e952. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000952. ISSN 1932-6203.
- Forstmeier, W.; Martin, K.; Bolund, E.; Schielzeth, H.; Kempenaers, B. (2011). "Female extrapair mating behavior can evolve via indirect selection on males". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108 (26): 10608–10613. doi:10.1073/pnas.1103195108. ISSN 0027-8424.
- Forstmeier, Wolfgang; Nakagawa, Shinichi; Griffith, Simon C.; Kempenaers, Bart (2014). "Female extra-pair mating: adaptation or genetic constraint?". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 29 (8): 456–464. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2014.05.005. ISSN 0169-5347.
- Forstmeier, Wolfgang (2004). "Female resistance to male seduction in zebra finches". Animal Behaviour. 68 (5): 1005–1015. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.02.003. ISSN 0003-3472.
- Holland, Brett; Rice, William R. (1998). "Perspective: Chase-away sexual selection: Antagonistic seduction versus resistance". Evolution. 52 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb05132.x. ISSN 0014-3820.
- Swaddle, J. P.; Cuthill, I. C. (1994). "Female zebra finches prefer males with symmetric chest plumage". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 258 (1353): 267–271. doi:10.1098/rspb.1994.0172. ISSN 0962-8452.
- Birkhead, T.R.; Hunter, F.M.; Pellatt, J.E. (1989). "Sperm competition in the zebra finch, Taeniopygia guttata". Animal Behaviour. 38 (6): 935–950. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(89)80135-6. ISSN 0003-3472.
- Birkhead, T. R.; Fletcher, F.; Pellatt, E. J.; Staples, A. (1995). "Ejaculate quality and the success of extra-pair copulations in the zebra finch". Nature. 377 (6548): 422–423. doi:10.1038/377422a0. ISSN 0028-0836.
- Zann 1996, p. 335
- Moskát, Csaba; Golüke, Sarah; Dörrenberg, Sebastian; Krause, E. Tobias; Caspers, Barbara A. (2016). "Female zebra finches smell their eggs". PLOS ONE. 11 (5): e0155513. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155513. ISSN 1932-6203.
- Hemmings NL, Slate J, Birkhead TR (2012). "Inbreeding causes early death in a passerine bird". Nature Communications. 3: 863. doi:10.1038/ncomms1870. PMID 22643890.
- Charlesworth D, Willis JH (2009). "The genetics of inbreeding depression". Nature Reviews Genetics. 10 (11): 783–96. doi:10.1038/nrg2664. PMID 19834483.
- Zann 1996, p. 45
- Morton, S. R.; Davies, P. H. (2006). "Food of the zebra finch (Poephila guttata), and an examination of granivory in birds of the Australian arid zone". Australian Journal of Ecology. 8 (3): 235–243. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.1983.tb01321.x. ISSN 0307-692X.
- Zann 1996, pp. 50–51
- Zann 1996, p. 46
- Zann 1996, pp. 49–50
- Zann 1996, p. 48
- Zann 1996, pp. 51–52
- Zann 1996, p. 54
- David, Morgan; Auclair, Yannick; Cézilly, Frank (2011). "Personality predicts social dominance in female zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata, in a feeding context". Animal Behaviour. 81 (1): 219–224. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.10.008. ISSN 0003-3472.
- David, Morgan; Cézilly, Frank; Giraldeau, Luc-Alain (2011). "Personality affects zebra finch feeding success in a producer–scrounger game". Animal Behaviour. 82 (1): 61–67. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.03.025. ISSN 0003-3472.
- Slater, P. J. B. (1974). "The temporal pattern of feeding in the zebra finch". Animal Behaviour. 22 (2): 506–515. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(74)80050-3. ISSN 0003-3472.
- Zann 1996, pp. 60–62
- Heidweiller, J.; Zweers, G. A. (1990). "Drinking mechanisms in the zebra finch and the Bengalese finch". The Condor. 92 (1): 1–28. doi:10.2307/1368379. ISSN 0010-5422.
- Zann 1996, pp. 69–71
- Calder, W. A.; King, J. R. (1963). "Evaporative cooling in the zebra finch". Experientia. 19 (11): 603–604. doi:10.1007/BF02151016. ISSN 0014-4754.
- Bech, Claus; Midtgård, Uffe (1981). "Brain temperature and the rete mirabile ophthalmicum in the zebra finch (Poephila guttata)". Journal of Comparative Physiology. 145 (1): 89–93. doi:10.1007/BF00782598. ISSN 0174-1578.
- Zann, Richard A. (1996). The Zebra Finch: A Synthesis of Field and Laboratory Studies. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-854079-3.
- Media related to Taeniopygia guttata at Wikimedia Commons
- BirdLife International species factsheet
- Videos, photos & sounds on the Internet Bird Collection
- Description on Vinkie
- View the Zebra finch genome in Ensembl
- View the taeGut2 genome assembly in the UCSC Genome Browser.
- Maintaining zebra finches Housing and husbandry for zebra finches