Free public transport
Free public transport, often called fare free public transit or zero-fare public transport, refers to public transport funded in full by means other than collecting fares from passengers. It may be funded by national, regional or local government through taxation or by commercial sponsorship by businesses. The concept of "free-ness" is one that may take other forms, such as no-fare access via a card which may or may not be paid in its entirety by the user.
- 1 Types
- 2 Benefits
- 3 Disadvantages
- 4 List of towns and cities with area-wide zero-fare transport
- 5 Perception and analysis
- 6 See also
- 7 References
- 8 External links
Tallinn, capital city of Estonia with more than 420.000 inhabitants, and several mid-size European cities and many smaller towns around the world have converted their public transportation networks to zero-fare. The city of Hasselt in Belgium is a notable example: fares were abolished in 1997 and ridership was as much as "13 times higher" by 2006.
- See list below.
|This section does not cite any sources. (March 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
Local zero-fare shuttles or inner-city loops are far more common than city-wide systems. They often use buses or trams. These may be set up by a city government to ease bottlenecks or fill short gaps in the transport network.
- See List of free public transport routes for a list of zero-fare routes within wider (fare-paying) networks
Some zero-fare services may be built to avoid the need for large transport construction. Port cities where shipping would require very high bridges might provide zero-fare ferries instead. These are free at the point of use, just as the use of a bridge might have been. Machinery installed within a building or shopping centre can be seen as 'zero-fare transport': elevators, escalators and moving sidewalks are often provided by property owners and funded through the sales of goods and services. Community bicycle programs, providing free bicycles for short-term public use could be thought of as zero-fare transport.
A common example of zero-fare transport is student transport, where students travelling to or from school do not need to pay. A notable example is the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, which provides much of the funding to operate the Stevens Point Transit system. All students at the university can use any of the four city-wide campus routes and the other four bus routes throughout the city free of charge. The university also funds two late night bus routes to serve the downtown free of charge with a goal of cutting down drunk driving.
In some regions transport is free because the revenues are lower that expenses from fare collection is already partially paid by government or company or service (for example BMO railway road in Moscow, most part of is used to as service transport and officially pick up passengers).
Many large amusement parks will have trams servicing large parking lots or distant areas. Disneyland in Anaheim, California, runs a tram from its entrance, across the parking lot, and across the street to its hotel as well as the bus stop for Orange County and Los Angeles local transit buses. Six Flags Magic Mountain in Valencia, California, provides tram service throughout its parking lot.
Transport operators can benefit from faster boarding and shorter dwell times, allowing faster timetabling of services. Although some of these benefits can be achieved in other ways, such as off-vehicle ticket sales and modern types of electronic fare collection, zero-fare transport avoids equipment and personnel costs.
Passenger aggression may be reduced. In 2008 bus drivers of Société des Transports Automobiles (STA) in Essonne held strikes demanding zero-fare transport for this reason. They claim that 90% of the aggression is related to refusal to pay the fare.
Some zero-fare transport services are funded by private businesses (such as the merchants in a shopping mall) in the hope that doing so will increase sales or other revenue from increased foot traffic or ease of travel. Employers often operate free shuttles as a benefit to their employees, or as part of a congestion mitigation agreement with a local government.
- Road traffic can benefit from decreased congestion and faster average road speeds, fewer traffic accidents, easier parking, savings from reduced wear and tear on roads
- Environmental and public health benefits including decreased air pollution and noise pollution from road traffic
Global benefits of zero-fare transport are also the same as those attributed to public transport generally. If use of personal cars is discouraged, zero-fare public transport could mitigate the problems of global warming and oil depletion.
Several large U.S. municipalities have attempted zero-fare systems, but many of these implementations have been judged unsuccessful by policy-makers. A 2002 National Center for Transportation Research report suggests that, while transit ridership does tend to increase, there are also some disadvantages:
- An increase in vandalism, resulting in increased costs for security and vehicle-maintenance
- An increase in students and homeless individuals riding transit, although it could not be determined whether they were riding aimlessly just to pass time, or whether they were using transit to access needed services
- In large transit systems, significant revenue shortfalls unless additional funding was provided
- An increase in driver complaints and staff turnover, even though farebox-related arguments were eliminated
- Slower service overall (not collecting fares has the effect of speeding boarding, but increased crowding tends to swamp out this effect unless additional vehicles are added)
- Declines in schedule adherence
This U.S. report suggests that, while ridership does increase overall, the goal of enticing drivers to take transit instead of driving is not necessarily met: because fare-free systems tend to attract a certain number of "problem riders", zero-fare systems may have the unintended effect of convincing some 'premium' riders to go back to driving their cars. It should be kept in mind that this was a study that only looked at U.S. cities, and the author's conclusions may be less applicable in other countries that have better social safety nets and less crime than the large U.S. cities studied. 
List of towns and cities with area-wide zero-fare transport
- For local and/or limited services, see List of free public transport routes
|Tallinn||435,245||2013||since 2013-01-01||Tallinn is currently the largest city offering free public transport for its residents. Regional buses are excluded from the scheme. Elron commuter trains are also free inside the city limits. Tallinn is also the first capital with free public transport for its residents.|
|Aubagne||42,900 (100,000 in the area concerned)||2009||since 2009-05-15||The Aubagne tramway is considered to be the first completely fare-free tram system in the world.||
|Colomiers||28,538||1971||since 1971||the first area of France to offer zero-fare public transport which is still in operation at present|
|Issoudun||13,500||1989||since 1989||has Free in the name of the service (Transport Issoudun Gratuit)|
|Libourne||23,000||2009||since 2009-01-01 for under 18s
since 2010-08-28 for everyone
|Vitré, Ille-et-Vilaine||15,313||2001||since spring 2001||first French urban agglomeration to do so.|
|Lübben||14,500||has been stopped||influenced by Hasselt|
|Templin||16,500||has been stopped|
Czech Republic 
|Třeboň||8,700||ČSAD Jindřichův Hradec a. s.||2002||between 2002-02 and 2007-08||under the mayor Jiří Houdek (KDU-ČSL), city transport has only one bus line (No 340300), influenced by USA school buses|
|Prague||1,285,000||many operators (first of all Dopravní podnik hl. m. Prahy)||2002||between 2002-08-15 (ca) and 2002-08-25, during the Vltava flood and flooding of the Prague metro||also always during time of the smog or other emergency (used rarely - 1996/1997 for 2 day, 1992/1993 for 4 days).|
|Hořovice||6,800||Probo Trans Beroun s. r. o.||2008||since 2008-03||city transport has only one bus line (No 210009 alias C09 or C9)|
|Valašské Meziříčí||27,300||ČSAD Vsetín a. s.||2009||between 2009-06-14 and 2009-07-14||city transport has 5 bus lines|
|Přelouč||9,000||Veolia Transport Východní Čechy a. s.||2009||between 2009-12-01 and 2010-03-06||initial price at the newly established first city bus line (No 665101)|
|Frýdek-Místek||58,200||ČSAD Frýdek-Místek a. s..||2011||since 2011-03-27||only 365-day chip coupon (howerver the chip card costs 299 Kč and prolongation 1 Kč) and user must to not be a debtor toward the city. Number of passengers has increased from 3.8 million in 2010 to 5.7 million in 2013. From 2014 is possible free travel on regional lines to next 18 villages and towns. Population in the serviced area is 100 000. Chip card for free public transport has 25 000 passengers.|
|Senec||18,000||MAD Senec||2013||since 2013-11-01||city transport has only one bus line|
Other European countries
|Gibraltar, United Kingdom||29,500||state||2011||since 2011-05|
|Nova Gorica, Slovenia||31,000||2006||since 2006-04|
|Hasselt, Belgium||72,000||De-Lijn||1997||since 1997-07-01||1300% ridership increase 1996-2006. In 2013, Hasselt stopped free bus service for adults; riders under 19 still travel for free.|
|Mons, Belgium||92,000||TEC Hainaut||1999||since 1999-07-01|
|Avesta, Sweden||21,000||from 2012
 retrieved 2016-06-17
|Kiruna, Sweden||18,090||2011||from 2011 to 2012-12|||
|Övertorneå, Sweden||2,000||even 70 km free rides on local buses in this rural municipality|
|Żory, Poland||62,625||2014||since 2014-05-01||Unconditionally free for all users.|
|Lugoj, Romania||37,700||2013||starting 2013-07-01|||
|Ploiești, Romania||201,226||TCE S.A.||2014||starting 31 March 2014||Second largest city in the world that offers free public transport. The benefits are limited to city residents with an income under 3,000 RON per month (about €670).|
|Cheremushki, RussiaCheremushki, Russia||9,000||trams are serviced by Dam's staff||zero fare is official to anybody (de jure service line because the taxes would be higher than revenues)|
|Ilioupoli, Greece||78,153||municipality||Free transportation to all, but only local buses, for specifically only local municipality buses.|
|Akureyri, Iceland||18,803||2007||Since 2007-01-01|||
Polling place in the historic tramway Gotha G4-61
|Agudos, SP||36,700||local government||2011||since 2011|||
|Ivaiporã, PR||31,812||local government||2011||since 2011|||
|Porto Real, RJ||16,574||local government||2011||since 2011|||
|Potirendaba, SP||15,449||local government||1998||since 1998|||
|Paulínia, SP||86,800||local government||2013||since 2013|||
|Maricá, RJ||146,549||Empresa Pública de Transportes - EPT||2014||since 2014|||
|Muzambinho, MG||21,975||local government||2011||since 2011|||
|Pitanga, PR||32,645||local government||2012||since 2012|||
|Silva Jardim, RJ||21,307||local government||2014||since 2014-02-15|||
United States 
|Boone, North Carolina||17,122||AppalCart||1981||since 1981||combination of funding from the town, Appalachian State University, Watauga County, and state and federal agencies.|
|Cache Valley, Utah||Cache Valley Transit District||2000||since 2000|
|Canby, Oregon||15,829||Canby Area Transit|
|Chapel Hill, Carrboro, and UNC-Chapel Hill, North Carolina||70,000+||Chapel Hill Transit||2002||since 2002||operated by the Town of Chapel Hill to serve Chapel Hill, Carrboro, and UNC-Chapel Hill; supported by taxpayers and University fee-payers|
|Clemson, South Carolina||11,939||Clemson Area Transit||partnership between Clemson University and surrounding communities|
|Commerce, California||41,000||City of Commerce Municipal Bus Lines||1962||since 1962||all transportation services are free of charge|
|Coral Gables, Florida||42,871|
|Corvallis, Oregon||54,462||Corvallis Transit System||2011||since 2011-02|||
|Emeryville, California||9,727||Emery Go Round|
|Island County, Washington||81,054||Island Transit||1987||since 1987||Fares charged on route 412C (intra-county service to Everett, Washington from Camano Island)|
|Ketchum/Sun Valley, Idaho||3,003||Mountain Rides|
|Lebanon, New Hampshire||13,151||Advance Transit||combination of state and federal funding and from Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center and Dartmouth College. Also serves Hanover and White River Junction, Vermont|
|Logan, Utah||49,534||Cache Valley Transit District||1992||since 1992|
|Macomb, Illinois||20,000||Go West Transit||2006||since 2006|
|Mammoth Lakes, California||8,234||Eastern Sierra Transit Authority|
|Marion, Indiana||29,948||Marion Area Transit System||2008||since 2008|
|Mason County, Washington||61,019||Mason Transit Authority||1992||Fares charged on intra-county routes|
|Missoula, Montana||69,122||Missoula Urban Transportation District|
|Sandy, Oregon||9,570||Sandy Area Metro||2000||since 2000|
|Stanford, California||13,809||Stanford Marguerite Shuttle|
|University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minnesota||51,853||U of M Transitway||1992||since 1992|
|Vail, Colorado||4,589||over 20 hours of service every day during winter|
|Vero Beach, Florida||140,000||GoLine||free 14-route public transit system serves 700,000 annual riders|
|Walla Walla, Washington||50,600||Valley Transit||1981||During summer months only|
|Wilmington, Vermont||2,225||Deerfield Valley Transit Association||1996||since 1996||free 13-route public transit system operated by Southeast Vermont Transit serving 200,000 riders annually and providing commuter bus service between Bennington and Brattleboro. Operates as "the MOOver".|
|Wilsonville, Oregon||19,509||South Metro Area Regional Transit|
Perception and analysis
|This section does not cite any sources. (July 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
Free public transport creates the perception of a no-cost service, just as car drivers commonly perceive no cost to deciding to take their car somewhere. The catch of the car-based system is that the car trip is not in fact free, but it is generally perceived as such.
Likewise, this perception of freeness is important for public transport, which is far more environmentally and resource efficient than own-car travel – which means in this case that full access to the system need not be altogether “free” for its users but that from a financial perspective is becomes (a) front-loaded and (b) affordable. The invariable fact of life of delivering any public service is that the money to do so must come from somewhere – and of “free” public transport that once the user has entered into some kind of “contract” with her or his city – for example a monthly or annual transit pass that opens up the public system to unlimited use for those who pay for it. Now, how they pay and how much will be part of the overall political/economic package (“contract”) of their community. In cities that offer such passes – as is the case to take but one example in most cities in France that since the mid-seventies have had their own Carte Orange – the remainder of the funds needed to pay for these services comes from other sources (mainly in this case from employers, local government).
Social-justice advocacy groups, such as the Swedish network Planka.nu, see zero-fare public transport as an effort in the redistribution of wealth. It is also argued that transportation to and from work is a necessary part of the work day, and is essential to the employer in the managing of work hours. It is thus argued that financing of public transportation should fall to employers rather than private citizens.
- Movimento Passe Livre, Brazilian movement campaigning for free public transport
- Reduced fare programs
- Planka.nu Swedish membership network which pays the penalty fare if you get caught without paying ticket
- Universal transit pass
- '10 jaar gratis openbaar vervoer' (in Dutch) on the city's official website
- Volkskrant.nl - Franse chauffeurs voor gratis buskaartje (in Dutch)
- Perone, Jennifer S. (October 2002). "Advantages and Disadvantages of Fare-Free Transit Policy" (PDF). NCTR Report Number: NCTR-473-133, BC137-38. National Center for Transportation Research. Retrieved 01/11/2012. Check date values in:
- "Tallinlase tasuta sõit Elron rongides" (in Estonian). Tallinn City Government. Retrieved 3 July 2016.
- "Türi linna tasuta bussiliin". Retrieved 3 July 2016.
- http://carfree.fr/index.php/2011/07/06/aubagne-aura-le-premier-tramway-au-monde-entierement-gratuit/. Missing or empty
- municipal website retrieved 2009-05-07 (in French)
- Smogový regulační systém, ENVIS Praha
- Tarif PID, XIV., 3.
- municipal website (in Spanish) retrieved 2009-05-08
- Kiruna municipality website (in Swedish) retrieved 2012-07-09
- HotNews.ro - Premiera in Romania: Municipiul Lugoj va avea transport in comun gratuit
- "Transporte público grátis já existe em cidades brasileiras". Envolverde. Retrieved 2013-06-22.
- "Transporte gratuito é realidade em cidades brasileiras". A Tarde. Retrieved 2013-06-22.
- "Tarifa zero é possível: conheça cidades que têm transporte público gratuito". Brasil Metrópole. Retrieved 2013-06-22.
- "Prefeitura de Potirendaba garante circular gratuita para população". Prefeitura de Potirendaba. Retrieved 2013-10-25.
- "Moura Júnior anuncia tarifa zero no transporte público de Paulínia, SP". G1. Retrieved 2013-10-25.
- "Fim do monopólio: transporte público é gratuito em Maricá". Prefeitura de Maricá. Retrieved 2016-02-13.
- "Tarifa zero: transporte público é de graça em Muzambinho, MG". G1. Retrieved 2013-10-25.
- ""Tarifa zero" é realidade em alguns municípios pequenos do Brasil". Gazeta do Povo. Retrieved 2013-10-25.
- "Transporte de tarifa zero completa um ano e meio de existência". Prefeitura de Silva Jardim. Retrieved 2016-02-13.
- appalcart.com - Microsoft Word - AppalCART Overview110125.doc - overview02-01-11.pdf
- "Transportation Services". City of Commerce, California (municipal web site). Retrieved 2012-01-11.
- "Corvallis Transit System drops bus fares". Corvallis Gazette-Times. February 1, 2011. Retrieved 19 June 2013.
- Hillhouse, Vicki (May 25, 2016). "Valley Transit set for another fare-free summer". Walla Walla Union-Bulletin. Retrieved July 14, 2016.
- Planka.nu: Free Public Transport
- Planka.nu: Kollektivtrafik ska vara avgiftsfri (Swedish)