|Office for the General Management of Affairs Concerning the Various Countries|
The Zongli Yamen (Chinese: 總理衙門), short for Office for the General Management of Affairs Concerning the Various Countries (总理各国事务衙门), also known as Prime Minister's Office, Office of General Management, was the government body in charge of foreign policy in imperial China during the late Qing dynasty. It was established by Prince Gong on 11 March 1861 after the Convention of Beijing. It was abolished by the Qing government in 1901 and replaced with a Foreign Office of ministry rank.
Meaning of name
Zongli Yamen is a traditional abbreviation of the official name (總理各國事務衙門; 总理各国事務衙门; Zǒnglǐ Gèguó Shìwù Yámén), literally meaning "Office in Charge of Affairs Concerning All Nations".The corresponding name in Manchu, the other official language of the Qing Empire, was Geren gurun i baita be uherileme icihiyara yamun. () A common misconception is that the Zongli Yamen's name means the "Premier's Office". This arose because the term zongli (总理) is now used in Chinese to refer to the Premier or Prime Minister of a country. In fact, the name Zongli Yamen is an abbreviation of its full name, which makes it the bona fide office of foreign affairs. In contemporary English sources, it was also called the "Board of Ministers for Foreign Affairs".
Function in the Qing government
Prior to the creation of the Zongli Yamen, Qing foreign relations were conducted by several different agencies, such as the Ministry of Rites and the Lifan Yuan. The Zongli Yamen was the first significant institutional innovation in the central Beijing bureaucracy that the Qing government had made since the Yongzheng Emperor created the nucleus of the Grand Council in 1729. The Zongli Yamen was supervised by a controlling board of five senior officials (initially all Manchus), among whom Prince Gong was the de facto leader. In their discussions on establishing the new agency, Qing officials reiterated that it was only to be a temporary institution, maintained until the current foreign and domestic crisis had passed. The Zongli Yamen had a relatively low formal status in the Qing administrative hierarchy and its members served concurrently in other government agencies, which further weakened its position. Furthermore, the Zongli Yamen was not the sole policy making body in foreign affairs, a prerogative which still rested in the hands of the emperor. While the Zongli Yamen remained an important body for a few decades after its foundation, its influence was soon overshadowed by influential officials such as Zeng Guofan and Li Hongzhang. Nevertheless, it became the means of communication between the Qing government and the foreign ministers to China in Beijing's legation quarter.
In 1873, the Zongli Yamen got into a quarrel with the foreign ministers to China over the protocol that was to be followed at their audience with the Tongzhi Emperor, as the foreign ministers not surprisingly refused to perform the ritual kowtow to the emperor, with an impasse eventually being solved thanks in part to the Japanese ambassador to China, Soejima Taneomi. Similar protocol would be followed in 1891 with the ministers' audience with the Guangxu Emperor.
In 1875, the Zongli Yamen began establishing foreign legations staffed by Qing diplomats and assisted by both foreign staff and Qing interpreters trained at the Tongwenguan. Through these legations, the Zongli Yamen gained a degree of autonomy in its self-representation and the ability to dispute the views of foreign diplomats in their home countries.
Following the Boxer Rebellion, the Qing government was forced to change its foreign service. According to Article XII in the Boxer Protocol 1901, the Zongli Yamen was replaced with a Foreign Office, known at the time as the Waiwubu (外務部; Wàiwùbù; 'External Affairs Department'), which ranked above the other six boards in the government; "as the course of subsequent events made clear, the Waiwubu was as ineffective in the establishment of good relations between China and the outside world as the Zongli Yamen had been."
- Mark Borthwick (20 April 2018). Pacific Century: The Emergence of Modern Pacific Asia. Taylor & Francis. pp. 124–. ISBN 978-0-429-97452-6.
- Zhongling Ye (2001). Wong Nai Siong and the Nanyang Chinese: An Anthology. Singapore Society of Asian Studies. ISBN 978-9971-9903-9-8.
- Bill Hayton (13 October 2020). The Invention of China. Yale University Press. pp. 49–. ISBN 978-0-300-25606-2.
- Zhu Weizheng (23 April 2015). Rereading Modern Chinese History. BRILL. pp. 305–. ISBN 978-90-04-29331-1.
- Dorothy Perkins (19 November 2013). Encyclopedia of China: History and Culture. Routledge. pp. 631–. ISBN 978-1-135-93562-7.
- See, e.g. Hart v Van Gumpach (China and Japan)  UKPC 9 (28 January 1873)
- Day, Jenny Huangfu (2021). "Mediating Sovereignty: The Qing legation in London and its diplomatic representation of China, 1876–1901". Modern Asian Studies. 55 (4): 1151–1184. doi:10.1017/S0026749X2000030X. ISSN 0026-749X. S2CID 225314710.
- S. M. Meng, The Tsungli Yamen: Its Organization And Functions, p. 81.
- Immanuel C. Y. Hsü. China's Entrance into the Family of Nations: The Diplomatic Phase, 1858 -1880. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1960.
- Banno, Masataka (坂野 正高 Banno Masataka). China and the West, 1858–1861: The Origins of the Tsungli Yamen. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1964.
- Meng, S. M. The Tsungli Yamen: Its Organization and Functions. Cambridge, Massachusetts: East Asian Research Center, 1962.
- H B Morse. International Relations of the Chinese Empire. 3 volumes. London and New York: by Longman and Green, 1910–18.
- Spence, Jonathan D. The Search for Modern China. New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company, 1990.
- Maria Bugrova Tsungli Yamen on Bumali Project