User contributions for Neotarf
A user with 4,029 edits. Account created on 8 November 2011.
1 December 2014
- 03:3603:36, 1 December 2014 diff hist +16 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Process question for the current ArbCom gender case: new heading
- 03:0503:05, 1 December 2014 diff hist +144 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Hiab removing evidence: Would someone ask HIAB to stop refactoring Jimbo's page?
- 02:5902:59, 1 December 2014 diff hist +175 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Process question for the current ArbCom gender case: I have been trying to post for the last hour but unfortunately the page is not stable.
- 02:4202:42, 1 December 2014 diff hist +189 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Hiab removing evidence: HIAB is removing the information again; this information was specifically requested by an arbitrator.
- 02:3702:37, 1 December 2014 diff hist +367 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision (edit summary removed)
- 02:2802:28, 1 December 2014 diff hist −752 User talk:Jimbo Wales please do not revert again without contacting an arbitrator by email
- 02:1602:16, 1 December 2014 diff hist +354 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Hiab removing evidence: new section
- 02:0702:07, 1 December 2014 diff hist +395 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard →How to delete a vector page: new section
- 01:3401:34, 1 December 2014 diff hist +313 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision (edit summary removed)
- 01:1701:17, 1 December 2014 diff hist −752 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Process question for the current ArbCom gender case: more accurate, some rephrasing needed
29 November 2014
- 15:5515:55, 29 November 2014 diff hist +905 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Process question for the current ArbCom gender case: How can I be "given a chance to comment on a diff in private" when I do not have access to it? Would Mr. Giuliano document where I have willingly disclosed such personally identifying information?
- 14:4514:45, 29 November 2014 diff hist +202 User talk:Neotarf →A tip: answering GoodDay
- 14:1214:12, 29 November 2014 diff hist +603 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →New evidence against Neotarf submitted by Salvio: I have no knowledge of who this Tutelary person is in real life, or which, if any, of the names they have used in various forums is their real name. Since the diff where I documented "their own willin
- 04:1504:15, 29 November 2014 diff hist +109 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Additional process questions: Answering Cas Liber
- 00:5600:56, 29 November 2014 diff hist +89 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Process question for the current ArbCom gender case: add link
28 November 2014
- 23:0923:09, 28 November 2014 diff hist +3 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Process question for the current ArbCom gender case: ce
- 22:5922:59, 28 November 2014 diff hist +664 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →New evidence against Neotarf submitted by Salvio: cmt
- 22:2022:20, 28 November 2014 diff hist +276 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Additional process questions: new section
- 22:1422:14, 28 November 2014 diff hist +2,835 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Process question for the current ArbCom gender case: new section
- 10:2410:24, 28 November 2014 diff hist +180 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →New evidence against Neotarf submitted by Salvio: by any other name
- 10:1910:19, 28 November 2014 diff hist +224 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →New evidence against Neotarf submitted by Salvio: cmt
- 10:0510:05, 28 November 2014 diff hist +311 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →New evidence against Neotarf submitted by Salvio: The editor, Tutelary, objected quite vocally to the use of male pronouns on the talk pages of 9 editors including myself. But only one pronoun was ever discovered. Surely you're not going to take the
- 09:5009:50, 28 November 2014 diff hist +168 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →New evidence against Neotarf submitted by Salvio: Is there a problem with looking at the evidence before making a judgement?
- 09:4409:44, 28 November 2014 diff hist +214 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →New evidence against Neotarf submitted by Salvio: There were three names, they were all diffed.
- 09:3209:32, 28 November 2014 diff hist +262 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →New evidence against Neotarf submitted by Salvio: The material was all posted openly by the user. I provided links for every piece of information. Why don't you get the links from AUSC yourself and see if I am lying.
- 09:2909:29, 28 November 2014 diff hist +245 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →New evidence against Neotarf submitted by Salvio: This evidence is stale, some 4 months old. Why has nothing been said before this? And WMF legal was involved at the time. Has anyone checked with them?
- 09:0909:09, 28 November 2014 diff hist −35 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →New evidence against Neotarf submitted by Salvio: e
- 04:1904:19, 28 November 2014 diff hist +409 User talk:Roger Davies →Arbcom gender case COI?: new section
- 04:1404:14, 28 November 2014 diff hist +1,432 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →New evidence against Neotarf submitted by Salvio: new section
26 November 2014
- 02:4102:41, 26 November 2014 diff hist +552 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →the gender disparity between Wikipedia editors.?: If there is no precedent for the Arbcom making a determination of a group's purpose, can the Arbcom decide what the purpose is *not*?
25 November 2014
- 20:4520:45, 25 November 2014 diff hist +1,076 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Need to improve the article of Macedonia naming dispute: take it to the talk page
- 19:1919:19, 25 November 2014 diff hist +1 m Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →the gender disparity between Wikipedia editors.?: fix typos
- 19:1719:17, 25 November 2014 diff hist +2,047 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision While the ArbCom is technically not supposed to decide content disputes, they have made a ''de facto'' decision about the purpose of the group by removing the individuals who want the group to encourage participation by women and leave the individuals w
- 18:0918:09, 25 November 2014 diff hist +616 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Need to improve the article of Macedonia naming dispute: ref added, although it probably will not add the level of analysis that the OP would wish
- 17:5317:53, 25 November 2014 diff hist +222 Macedonia naming dispute →Interim accord: add ref to The American Journal of International Law to supplement dead link
- 07:0507:05, 25 November 2014 diff hist +166 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →the gender disparity between Wikipedia editors.?: drawing a blank
- 06:4706:47, 25 November 2014 diff hist +142 User talk:Carcharoth →Your comment on PD page: ygm
- 04:1604:16, 25 November 2014 diff hist +255 User talk:Newyorkbrad →Civility paroles: answering GoodDay
- 04:0304:03, 25 November 2014 diff hist +395 User talk:Newyorkbrad →Iago: Othello Act 3, scene 3, 155–161: wishful thinking
- 03:2303:23, 25 November 2014 diff hist +29 User talk:Carcharoth →Your comment on PD page: more specifically
- 02:4702:47, 25 November 2014 diff hist +1,822 User talk:Carcharoth →Your comment on PD page: new section
24 November 2014
- 18:3818:38, 24 November 2014 diff hist +160 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Neotarf Ban: Would the clerks please remove this new ad hominem attack against me. —~~~~
- 18:3518:35, 24 November 2014 diff hist +155 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Questions for the committee about proposed principles, findings of fact, and remedies for Neotarf: Would the clerks please remove this ad hominem attack against me?
- 18:3218:32, 24 November 2014 diff hist +359 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →the gender disparity between Wikipedia editors.?: It seems the language of the bans has been changed to "disparity between editors". Could someone be so kind as to explain the meaning of this new language, and perhaps either introduce this in a new
- 18:2718:27, 24 November 2014 diff hist +19 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Neotarf Ban: clarify
- 18:2618:26, 24 November 2014 diff hist +685 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Neotarf Ban: This is nothing but an ''ad hominem'' attack against me and I ask the clerks to remove it.
- 12:5412:54, 24 November 2014 diff hist +272 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →the gender disparity between Wikipedia editors.?: new section
- 09:2209:22, 24 November 2014 diff hist +2,858 User talk:Newyorkbrad →Iago: Othello Act 3, scene 3, 155–161: new section
- 07:5707:57, 24 November 2014 diff hist +13 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Questions for the committee about proposed principles, findings of fact, and remedies for Neotarf
- 07:5207:52, 24 November 2014 diff hist +6,769 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Questions for the committee about proposed principles, findings of fact, and remedies for Neotarf: new section
