User talk:Ricardo Cancho Niemietz
Welcome!
Hello, Ricardo Cancho Niemietz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
Standard template above, I just wanted to add, Good work at List of palettes! :) --Quiddity 18:41, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Great job![edit]
Awesome job on the List of palettes article! Thank you for your many contributions to the article! Nice to have people like you on Wikipedia. See you around. Jecowa 03:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Awesome job even on the 80's z80 game development - your work is a very important part of the game development history! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.196.137.150 (talk) 16:15, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Re: One of your images substituted in the List of palettes article[edit]
Hey, I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia prefers images of the highest quality possible (unless the image is copyrighted). The Mediawiki software automatically creates a scaled-down version of the image to the exact size needed in the article. Thanks for trying to optimize the article though. Jecowa 21:09, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Reply to your comments[edit]
I will respond to the comments you placed at User talk:Gerry Ashton at that place to keep the discussion in one place. --Gerry Ashton 20:11, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
source for "Tower of Babel" tributes to Metropolis (film)[edit]
Hi, do you know of a source that says this? --Jtir (talk) 20:08, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- About Blade runner, the alike building is shown also in its official poster; you can see it in its wikipedia's article as well. About Akira it is shown at the very beginning of the film, among the aerial views of Neo-Tokyo. You can find it in the following Akira's photo gallery: http://www.animegalleries.net/img/13699. But written sources explaining the images as been Metropolis' inspired, sorry, I haven't them. Wikipedia states that "content" must be verificable, and the images I referred are physical proofs of the fact (or perhaps do you think that the similarities of the takes are pure coincidence? :-)Ricardo Cancho Niemietz (talk) 10:29, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- We are in luck with Blade Runner, anyway. The article has an excellent reference that can be searched online at amazon.com. It says quite a bit about Metropolis (film) — much more than what is in BR. BTW, I was thinking more of WP:NOR. --Jtir (talk) 16:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- I've found a blog in spanish (I'm from Spain) talking about Metropolis-alike cinema cities, in http://www.divertinajes.com/cinexin/030318.html. Even if you don't understand spanish, you can enjoy all the photographs; they include "tower of Babel". The author mentions Jorge Gorostiza, architect and film-lover (Gorostiza also has a book about Blade Runner buildings, but I don't know if he cites explicitely Fritz Lang's Metropolis). In every case, the blog's author cites Katsuhiro Otomo's Akira, but he doesn't stablishes the direct tribute to Metropolis, so most likely this blog can't be cited as source. But if it helps you...--Ricardo Cancho Niemietz (talk) 18:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| Have this barnstar for great work on the palette and indexed color articles. —jacobolus (t) 02:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC) |
- Thanks a lot! -Ricardo Cancho Niemietz (talk) 09:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
I'd like to join. You've done a great job on List of 8-bit computer hardware palettes and other articles, with detailed descriptions covering the various different video modes, and illustrating images. – b_jonas 14:21, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
rationale[edit]
I have reverted your fair use rationale as nonsense. Dicklyon (talk) 17:31, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- I revert your revertion. "Nonsense" must be argued before deletion. It seems that you dislike the test card image (Perhaps 'cos it's an European one? Do you prefer a NTSC, American one instead?), but to me and to all the people visiting the article the image is fine, fits well and it's accurate. So keep it there. Again, your "contributions" are mainly deletions, that (when not about vandalism) are discouraged by the Wikipedia guidelines. Ricardo Cancho Niemietz (talk) 18:29, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
HSB in RGB color model article[edit]
Hi. You [jacobolus] stripped away twice my HSB example in the RGB color model article. Yes, it's merely an example, but it's an interesting one 'cos its geometric representation isn't a cube, but a cone. Your proposals Lab and YUV have cubes as their geometric representations, the same as RGB. So please, "rescue" again the HSB example in order to cite al least an 3-component color model that don't map to a cube. Yours. Ricardo Cancho Niemietz (talk) 18:12, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yup, I did, and I'd do it again. The sentence says “in other color models…” and putting HSV in that category is inaccurate or at least imprecise, because HSV is the same color model. Instead, HSL/HSV should be given a paragraph or two under the “geometric representations” section of the RGB article, because they are alternate geometric representations of RGB. —jacobolus (t) 18:47, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- I think you'll need a good source to assert that RGB and HSB are the "same color model". It's right that both can be mapped into each other thru appropiate conversions, but they aren't the "same". Also, HSB isn't the same that HSL/HSV. The geometrical representation of HSB is a cone, but that of HSL/HSV is a double cone (two cones sharing their bases and with their vertices pointing to opposite directions). At most, HSB and HSL/HSV are "alternative" representations of RGB (or any other color model), but their color models are different that RGB. Yours. Ricardo Cancho Niemietz (talk) 11:08, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- According to HSL and HSV, HSB is typically interpreted as same as HSL, a bi-cone, as opposed to HSV, a cone (if you have sources to the contrary, that would be a good place to add them). Both are trival transformations from gamma-compressed RGB, which is why Jacobalus say they use the same color model. You can figure out what color they represent without going through an additive combination of R, G, and B primaries. Dicklyon (talk) 05:47, 17 May 2008
(UTC)
- Hum, it must be an error somewhere. For a practical comparison, test the HSB sliders in Photoshop, and you will see that maximum value of the Brightness (B) component corresponds with white if Saturation (S) component is zero, but another color if saturation is greater than zero. That is, B=max is the base of a single cone, while B=0 is the vertex. But when in the «Hue/Saturation» adjustment, it uses HSL instead, where the minimum and maximum values for the Luminosity (L) component are black and white, respectively, regadless the values of the other components, the Hue (H) and the Saturation (S). That is, they are the two vertices of the double cone. So probably there are some confussion in the article you cite, due to HSB isn't equal to HSL/HSV. As you have a Mac, test the built-in system's color selection applets and you will see, along with the RGB color selector, two different selectors for HSB and HSV/HSL. In other hand, all of us agree in that there are interchangeability between RGB and HSB, or RGB and HSV/HSL, but that they are different models (components don't represent the same in RGB that in HSB), so it's OK. Yours. Ricardo Cancho Niemietz (talk) 09:42, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Duplicate Image:Screen color test SEGAGameGear.png[edit]
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Screen color test SEGAGameGear.png, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Screen color test SEGAGameGear.png is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Screen color test SEGAGameGear.png, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:02, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
NowCommons: Image:MSX2plus YJK&YAE palette sample image.png[edit]
Image:MSX2plus YJK&YAE palette sample image.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:MSX2plus YJK&YAE palette sample image.png, Image:MSX2plus YJK&YAE palette color test chart.png as Commons:Image:MSX2plus YJK&YAE palette color test chart.png, Image:MSX2plus YJK&YAE palette.png as Commons:Image:MSX2plus YJK&YAE palette.png and Image:Screen color test MSX2plus Screen10&11.png as Commons:Image:Screen color test MSX2plus Screen10&11.png. Commons is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image(s) will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:MSX2plus YJK&YAE palette sample image.png]]. Note that this is an automated message. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:51, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Reclamación[edit]
Encima de que contribuyes en otro idioma subes las imágenes aquí en vez de commons para que no podamos usarlas.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.48.45.230 (talk) 13:38, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Missing Game Boy Color Startup Palatte[edit]
You uploaded an image in the List of videogame console palettes article of a startup palette for Game Boy Color. The image is now missing. Could you please upload it again? It is found at the following link.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Screen_color_test_GameboyColor_Palette8_DarkBlue_Left-A.png
Thank you in advance.
You reverted Highcolor (15-bit) version of the image (diff). The color palette is not consistent to the SNES rendering. Is there any justification on why that image is not compatible? NHJG2 (talk) 00:58, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
How did you converted the images?[edit]
What program you used to convert and adapt the parrot and hues images to the computer's/console's color depth? i wanted to see how my images would look on that consoles! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.213.170.19 (talk) 05:20, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
File:Screen color test GameboyColor Palette8 DarkBlue Left-A.png listed for deletion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Screen color test GameboyColor Palette8 DarkBlue Left-A.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 00:15, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Error on "RGB 24bits palette color test chart.png", and a question[edit]
If you made this image, nice job! I love how perfect it is! However, I did spot a single error. On the "fuchsia" color bar, at around Brightness 5%-7%, it's colored differently from the rest. It's easier to spot if you look at it in the Red channel. Perhaps you could fix that, or was that done intentionally?
As for my question: I'm possibly interested in helping with creating versions of the palette and parrot for various computer systems. Do you do it all yourself, or is it possible for me to help?
Either way, I appreciate the work you've done! If anything, thank you! -- 71.141.96.129 (talk) 07:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Transparent Color Overlay.png[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Transparent Color Overlay.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Ysangkok (talk) 16:37, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Reading PCX files[edit]
I am having trouble reading the data from a small pcx ver 5 file of a company logo. There shouldn't be anything but black and white in the image. I want to send the pixels to an HP printer, but all I get is garbage images, if anything at all. The problem is probably mostly reading the palette: I don't know how to read the R data separately from the other colors and intensity. I run out of data before I run out of scan lines as well. I hope I am not violating Wikipedia policy by attempting to contact you through this talk page, but I do not know any other way to reach you. If you wish to help, I can provide more detail, a copy of the logo file, and even details of my (non-working) reasoning. Thanks. Rrsocal (talk) 17:50, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello—I was looking at File:Sprite rendering by binary image mask.png and it looks like it's a composite of other works. Could you please note where those components are from and who made them? Thanks, – czar 22:01, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
| Thanks for your work on the palettes pages! Because of this I donated to the Wikimedia foundation. Mattsephton (talk) 23:23, 2 December 2015 (UTC) |
Head paragraph of Palette (computing)[edit]
Hi Ricardo,
I shortened the head paragraph of Palette (computing) because I found it very hard to read and understand for an introduction. Since it was mainly written by you, I wanted to inform you so that you could have a look over it. Comments and / or improvements are appreciated. :) Se'taan (talk) 23:52, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Please attribute or claim media you uploaded or restored: File:RGB 24bits palette sample image 9bpp PCE.png[edit]
You uploaded or restored , File:RGB 24bits palette sample image 9bpp PCE.png, but for various reasons did not add an {{information}} block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Wikipedia needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.
If it's entirely your own work:
please include {{own}} in the relevant source field, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers.
- If the {{media by uploader}} tag is present please add, a
|claimed=yesparameter to the tag. - If the {{img-unclaimed}} tag is present, please change it to {{img-claimed}}
If it's not entirely your own work, or the media is based on the work of others:
Please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or {{own}}, will eventually be listed at Files for Discussion or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers. You should also read Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission which details how to confirm any permissions you obtained for works by others that are still in copyright.
Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If media is not claimed, and there's no other obvious source or authorship information, the file may have to be removed for copyright reasons.
It's okay to remove or strike messages like this once the concerns have been addressed. :). 18:55, 27 October 2018 (UTC)ShakespeareFan00 (talk)
Please attribute or claim media you uploaded or restored: File:RGB 24bits palette sample image 9bpp MD.png[edit]
You uploaded or restored , File:RGB 24bits palette sample image 9bpp MD.png, but for various reasons did not add an {{information}} block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Wikipedia needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.
If it's entirely your own work:
please include {{own}} in the relevant source field, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers.
- If the {{media by uploader}} tag is present please add, a
|claimed=yesparameter to the tag. - If the {{img-unclaimed}} tag is present, please change it to {{img-claimed}}
If it's not entirely your own work, or the media is based on the work of others:
Please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or {{own}}, will eventually be listed at Files for Discussion or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers. You should also read Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission which details how to confirm any permissions you obtained for works by others that are still in copyright.
Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If media is not claimed, and there's no other obvious source or authorship information, the file may have to be removed for copyright reasons.
It's okay to remove or strike messages like this once the concerns have been addressed. :). ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:56, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
The file File:RGB 6level palette.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Palette RGB 9bit.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Parrot mono-lcd-blue palette.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
The file File:MSX2 palette.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Parrot AtariST 16 palette.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Parrot msx palette.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Parrot grayscale palette.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Parrot web palette.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Parrot amscpc palette.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Parrot 16Win palette.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Parrot 685levRGB palette.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Hicolor64 palette.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Norton Utilities 6.01 UI.png[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Norton Utilities 6.01 UI.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Snapshot DeluxePaint II MSDOS.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Snapshot DeluxePaint II MSDOS.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 11 February 2023 (UTC)