User talk:Izzedine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User:Greater Syria)

Unfinished template[edit]

This article is part of the series on the
History of Iraq
the land between the rivers
Ancient Iraq
9,500 BCE - 5,500 BCE
Pre-Pottery Neolithic · Jarmo
Hassuna culture · Halafian culture
Sumerian Civilization
5,500 BCE - 2,000 BCE
Samarran culture · Eridu
Ubaid period · Uruk period
Jemdet Nasr period
Early Dynastic period
Akkadian Empire · Gutian dynasty
Neo-Sumerian Empire
AssyriaBabylonia
2,000 BCE - 640 CE
Amorites · Hurrians · Mitanni
Hittites · Kassites · Aramaeans
Neo-Assyrian Empire · Neo-Babylonian Empire
Chaldea · Median Empire
Achaemenid Assyria · Achaemenid Babylonia
Seleucid Babylonia · Parthian Babylonia
Roman Assyria · Roman Mesopotamia
Asuristan
Islamic Golden Age
640 CE - 1258 CE
Islamic conquest of Iraq
Rashidun Caliphate · Umayyad Caliphate
Abbasid Caliphate · Ayyubid Sultanate
1258 CE - 1508 CE
Mongol invasion of Iraq
Ilkhanate · Jalayirid Sultanate
Kara Koyunlu · Ak Koyunlu
Modern Era
1508 CE - Present
Safavid dynasty · Ottoman Empire
Mamluk rule in Iraq
British Mandate of Mesopotamia
Kingdom of Iraq · Republic of Iraq
–––– • ––––



[[Category:Iraq templates [[Category:History and events templates


Barnstar[edit]

The Resilient Barnstar
Though I wasn't involved..I am a horrible talk page stalker ;) and happened to stumble to this page and read what happend. I am very sorry that this happened to you and for being resilient and never quitting to try to clear your name---and never letting discouragement get you. You deserve this;) SchnitzelMannGreek. 11:24, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

The Special Barnstar
For all your hard work on Iraq. There just was not one single barnstar I could give as you deserved about 10, so I gave this one. Hope you like it and keep up the good work! ScythreTalkContribs 19:13, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your behaviour[edit]

this edit leaves me humbled. NOT. So you believe we should be thankful you are "donating your time" to introduce trivial see also links, while most of the remaining time you are wasting everybody else's time with your private obsessions about "Ancient Iraq".

I have, in fact "donated my time" to write an actual WP:LEAD at history of Iraq which did discuss the history of Iraq (as opposed to grandiose eulogies on how Ancient Iraq is the origin of everything good and civilized). Do keep prancing around like this and you'll be back on WP:ANI and hit by the banhammer in no time. This has gone on long enough, and it has become clear that you simply aren't here to help the project. --dab (𒁳) 13:50, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please be civil with other people. I don't know you, and you are accosting me and insulting my interests. What is the problem with my edits on History of Iraq? that you mass-reverted calling me a "troll". Izzedine 14:38, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

You were warned to stop time-wasting. It's clear you didn't listen to the warning I gave you after the off-wiki canvassing episode. As a result I have banned you permanently: you may appeal this via the usual channels. Moreschi (talk) 14:37, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
How was I time wasting? by improving a long neglected article? minding my own business? A terrible abuse of admin powers. You have permanently banned me because a user asked you to, after he came along and created a disruption? Izzedine 14:41, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

These are exact citations [1] [2] from reliable sources that Dbachmann was altering. Why? Izzedine 16:07, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Iraqi astrologers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:50, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]