User talk:IA Finance Type

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Speedy deletion of Intangible asset finance[edit]

A tag has been placed on Intangible asset finance requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Quercus basaseachicensis (talk) 18:30, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I thought I'd stop by and explain a bit more. I found the page while I was cleaning out links to disambiguation pages, quite by chance. (I think you linked to franchise, which is a dab page and simply lists various articles that could be intended by the term franchise.) I then noticed some of the external links sprinkled in the body of your page, and so I converted them to internal links. Some of those exist, some of them don't yet - no matter. The reason to change them is that sometimes people use those external links as spam links, so as to increase the credibility of their website; there's no suggestion that you were doing that, but the policy is pretty clear in any event. And then I found a few assertions that ought to be referenced, so I tagged those. Take 'em off if you like, but someone else will do it again, I'm sure.

Anyway, I'm sorry it looked like a pile-on; that wasn't my intent. Cheers, --AndrewHowse (talk) 22:02, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Vivian Fung, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.vivianfung.net/bio.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:10, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Vivian Fung[edit]

A tag has been placed on Vivian Fung requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. justinfr (talk/contribs) 15:43, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]