User talk:Obradovic Goran

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia, the greatest encyclopedia on Earth! You seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! You may wish to review the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, as well as the avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages. The Wikipedia directory is also quite useful. In addition, you might want to add yourself to the new user log; if you made any edits before getting an account, you may wish to assign those to your username.

By the way, an important tip: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments.

Finally, here are some open tasks:


You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.

Hope to see you around the Wiki! And if you have any questions whatsoever, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Neutrality (hopefully!) 00:58, Oct 13, 2004 (UTC)


Thanks for uploading Image:Ducic.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, BrokenSegue 00:17, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Hi! Regarding photo that I've uploaded: I'm not familiar with GDFL and that other stuff, but picture is from Serbian Wikipedia, so i guess that it's not copyrighted. Djordjes posted it on Serbian wiki, and here is his User page on Serbian wiki, where you can contact him in English (or tell me what to ask him).

By the way, Jovan Ducic died in 1943, 62 years ago, so copyright of this photo (if any) should have expired long ago --Obradović Goran (talk 00:57, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I was just going to ask you if you could contact Djordjes. You should (does he even speak english) ask him where he got the image from and why he thinks the image is free to use. (If he does speak english I'll talk to him) I found the page where the image is on the Serbian wiki sr:Слика:Ducic.jpg. I can't read the text below the picture but I think that it is just the man's name. Copyrights are based upon the death of the artist <somthing like 70 years too> not the subject so the picture isn't necesarily free to use. Although I have a feeling it is. If Djordjes doesn't respond i'll leave the image with a link to the other wiki. Thanks Again! BrokenSegue 01:09, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
P.S. You don't need to copy your responses to both your talk page and mine.
P.S.S. Read up on your edits, welcome ambassador of Serbia :) BrokenSegue

Sorry for taking so long to respond. I'm no expert on copyright law so I passed this case on to Neutrality hopefully he will have time to solve this in the future. Thanks for translating that text for me. BrokenSegue 00:11, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Embassy[edit]

Hi, thanks for agreeing to be one of the ambassadors. There isn't any formal process to go through -- just add your name to Wikipedia:Local Embassy and meta:Embassy. Angela. 19:39, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC)

Quote[edit]

Hi, the quote on my user page is, I believe, from Jimbo Wales and it's on the Donations page. See here [1]. Best, SlimVirgin 00:36, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)

I fixed your link in the embassy[edit]

...so that now it will point to this page.

I hope you've no objections to my having added myself. Budi siguran da, if something vital comes up (that is, if someone asks an important question), I'll ask you first...Otherwise, please tell me and I'll remove myself. --VKokielov 02:01, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

On the other hand...[edit]

Since it doesn't look like it's so simple - I was just over at sr:Википедија:Амбасада - I'll remove my name.

thank you very very much!![edit]

hello! very nice to meet you! because i love your motherland, i often feel sorrow that i hadn't learn serbian. your significative moves me very much! thank you very much! you have all my best wishes!!! it's too late in china now! i have to go to sleep, good night (good day in serbia)!*^_^* --icywind 15:29, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Kate's tool[edit]

Hi. Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. I'd recommend you either get in touch with Kate (sending an email from here might be most effective) or with another m:developer. Hope this helps! Smoddy (Rabbit and pork) 20:33, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Serbian cross[edit]

Google search for "srpski krst" in Latin alphabet finds 45 results and in Cyrillic 1180(!?), while for "srpska ocila" in Latin 15 and in Cyrillic one. So I guess it's clear which term is used more oftenly. I'll add more info on firesteels, and you can edit it yourself if you think more should be added - you don't need to ask me for permission :) Nikola 15:55, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pavlov's House[edit]

See commons:Pavlov's House, although i have difficulties linking the russian language images to the english wiki. -- Chris 73 Talk 21:16, May 15, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the info! It's great that we have these pictures. Could they be renamed to the Latin alphabet, if software isn't supporting Cyrillic? -- Obradović Goran (talk 22:32, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
See also Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#foreign language image names. I think I will rename the image on the commons. -- Chris 73 Talk 11:20, May 16, 2005 (UTC)
Changed image names. Also added image of Pavlow to his article. -- Chris 73 Talk 11:38, May 16, 2005 (UTC)

Rosa Luxemburg[edit]

Hi Goran, it looks like it was a typo for 1899. I've changed it. Saintswithin July 5, 2005 17:44 (UTC)

Re:Black Sabbath:Paranoid rulz[edit]

Damn straight. If you can ever get a hold of it, listen to Supernaut off of Black Sabbath, Vol. 4. Your talk link was so pretty I had to click it... @_@ *hypnotized* Redwolf24 02:05, 11 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Please don't reply on my talk page until I archive it. Thanks~

Serbian portal[edit]

As the amount of material somehow connected with Serbs and Serbia on Wikipedia grows, I think it wouldn't be a bad idea to form a SCG/Serb portal, so that all the articles about famous Serbs, Serb history, the Serb republic etc are more closely interlinked. This would also provide the casual reader with a easy to use encyclopaedia of everything they could wish to know about RS, SCG, the Serb diaspora etc. Јес' да је Србија мала и да је мало Срба али ипак има Палестински портал, Doctor Who портал, зато нема разлога да и ми ово не покренемо. At this stage I'm just gauging the amount of interest out there for this. If you support тхис идеа, and want to help out, then just drop by my talk page -- estavisti 20:02, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Russian tsarinas[edit]

regarding the names of tsarinas of Russia: if from abroad, they changed their first name, such as Wilhelmina became Natalia Alexeievna, etc. Now, Wikipedia has certain rules that the so-called consort name is not to be used, because of several persons being e.g Empress Maria Fedorovna. And that a pre-marital name should be used. But I feel that it is acceptable to make a formulation "Natalia Alexeievna of Darmstadt" (the "of Darmstadt" being for disambiguation purposes) instead of using "Wilhelmina of Darmstadt". Now, as there are plenty of Germanist and anglicist opinions, I would like to know some of international opinion. In other words, I am asking you to think whether from the perspective of non-Russian Slavonic, (1) would it be acceptable to say "Natalia Alexeievna of Darmstadt" and (2) would that be better or worse than "Wilhelmina of Darmstadt". 62.78.105.68 08:31, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think that "Natalia Alexeievna of Darmstadt" seems fine. Then again, I'm a Slav, and this name is "closer" to me. I'm not really familiar with Russian royal customs, so I can't say this or that is the right thing to do, I only can say that (esthetically) Natalia beats Wilhelmina - Wilhelmina is also OK. I am really sorry that I can't give you some more argumentated assistance :( -- Obradović Goran (talk 00:23, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, this is an ongoing policy discussion, and the anon has not listed all of the options being considered. If you're interested, the discussion is at this talk page. Best, Choess 01:08, July 22, 2005 (UTC)

I read your opinion: "These persons won their right to be in this encyclopedia mostly by being Empresses of Russia, and thus their articles should be named by their post-conversion names. When it comes to voting, I think that the best choice would be 2 or 4. Disambiguating by years seems silly (if I know so much about a person – why looking up at Wikipedia :)" -- and I am thankful to you as now I know a perspective of an outsider Slav.

There is an ongoing vote now also at Talk:Alexandra Fyodorovna of Hesse where I have been willing to approve the alternatives "Alexandra Fyodorovna of Hesse", "Alexandra Fedorovna of Hesse" and "Alexandra of Hesse", whereas I am against "Alix of Hesse" and "Alix of Hesse and by Rhine". The situation seems rather similar and it seems we are in agreement basically. I think that "Alexandra Fyodorovna of Russia" is an acceptable English translation of a name form which could be in use in books, papers and other literature in some Slavic languages.

In my opinion, none of these alternatives are easy, mostly because those women changed their first names when already adults. We just should find the most elegant solution.

Russian royal customs apparently have almost nothing to do with this, they would have probably wanted to call her as "Empress Alexandra Fyodorovna of Russia", but then there is the disambiguation problem, as there existed also another empress A.F. Arrigo 09:33, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Мрцина[edit]

Е па стварно,мрцина не да није засрдела,него се није ни оладила а ти си се већ бачио.(Све,све ал` зар не виде да сам планирао још нешто да испишем,но добро ти ће га више пута исписаваш.) --CrniBombarder!!! 06:59, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ма нисам те #%&$"# због тога што си преводио,него што си га превео док још није био готов(а и зато што си ме врашки натрипов`о).Да,прећи ћемо на урођенички,него је ово било чисто међу нама,па зато. --CrniBombarder!!! 19:52, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jovanvb[edit]

Re: your email.

I've noticed that you have blocked user Jovanvb.

Have I? No such action appears in the blocklog.

I am aware that you block a fair number of users just like this one, but I expect your personal apology to Jovan because of this abominable act!

Do you? That's nice. Evercat 23:27, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you've blocked an actual user or IP number (diference is only semantical, isn't it).

There's a very big difference. If I block an IP address and it affects a legitimate user, it doesn't mean I was targetting that user.

If the username is the only thing that is bothering you, why don't you just block the user, instead of blocking every IP number that chap ever used?

I have just blocked the username. There is however a feature in the software, whereby any IP address a blocked user logs in from is automatically blocked for 24 hours...

You can read here what info I got.

It says:

The reason given is this: Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "Evercunt". The reason given for Evercunt's block is: "Username".

You see the prefix Auto- meaning automatic.

Your IP address is 82.117.194.66. Please include this address, along with your username, in any queries you make.

Which you didn't do. I have now unblocked 82.117.194.66.

Evercat 10:45, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Grb-novibeograd.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Grb-novibeograd.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, so its copyright status is therefore unclear. Please add a tag to let us know its copyright status. (If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know on the image description page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Otherwise, see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged imaged will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Creidhne 22:39, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think that it can go under fair use (but I'm not an expert for those things). -- Obradović Goran (talk 22:52, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

IP blocking[edit]

Hi Fvw! I'm experiencing some problems due to the activity of the vandal with the IP number 82.117.194.66, and your efforts to restrain him. I am using the Serbia Broadband ISP's proxy for Internet surfing, which is unfortunately the same IP number our problematic contributor is using. I fully well understand that you're doing what you must, but I would like to inform you that SBB is a big ISP, with a lot of users, and 2 of burrecrats from Serbian Wikipedia are using that very same IP number, and they are affected by blockings.

Angela and other admins on IRC told me that it is very uncommon practise to block IP numbers infinitely. If there is necessity for blocking IP 82.117.194.66, could you please try to keep it as short as possible, in accordance with frequency of vandal's activity, since it affects several contributors. -- Obradović Goran (talk 18:50, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Heya, sorry for the inconvenience. There is some misconception about this with some of the older wikipedians, but in fact it's policy to block open proxies indefinitely on the english wikipedia.
Anyway, so far for the bad news, now the good news: I can no longer access the proxy at 82.117.194.66, so it would appear the ISP in question got their act together and locked down their proxy. Let's hope it sticks, and happy editing! --fvw* 18:59, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User Categorization[edit]

You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Serbia and Montenegro page as living in or being associated with Serbia and Montenegro. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Serbia and Montenegro for instructions. -Alekk 23:12, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem RE: Image:Opstinebgd.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Opstinebgd.gif. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law. We need you to specify two things on the image description page:

  • The copyright holder, and
  • The copyright status

The copyright holder is usually the creator. If the creator was paid to make this image, then their employer may be the copyright holder. If several people collaborated, then there may be more than one copyright holder. If you created this image, then you are the copyright holder.

Because of the large number of images on Wikipedia, we've sorted them using image copyright tags. Just find the right tag corresponding to the copyright status of this image, and paste it onto the image description page like this: {{TAGHERE}}.

There are 3 basic ways to licence an image on Wikipedia:

  • The copyright holder gets the best protection of his work by licencing their work under an open content license like the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licence. If you have the express permission of the copyright holder to licence their work under the above licence, use the image copyright tag: {{cc-by-sa-2.5}}. The GNU Free Documentation License is another choice for licencing one's work. Again, if you have the express permission of the copyright holder, use the tag: {{GFDL}}.
  • The copyright holder can also release his work into the public domain, see here for images released into the public domain.
    • Images from certain sources are automatically release into the Public Domain. This is true for most governments like the federal United States government. (See here for images from the government of the USA and here for other governments) However not all governments release their work into the public domain, such as the UK government (See herefor images from the UK government). Non-free licence governments are listed here.
  • Also, in some cases, an image is copyrighted but allowed on Wikipedia because of Fair Use. To see if this image qualifies and then how to tag it, see Wikipedia:Fair use.

For any other sources of for more information see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags. Please remember that if you don't tag your images, they will be deleted.

P.S. If you have uploaded other images without including copyright tags, please go back and tag them. Also, please tag all images that you upload in the future.

If you have any questions, just leave a message on my talk page. Thanks again. --Dijxtra 12:16, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RS[edit]

Hi. There is a revert war going on Republika Srpska article. Would you please come to Talk:Republika_Srpska#Latest_POV_problems to check the discussion and give your opinion? Nikola 18:02, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please rephrase your comment[edit]

I noticed your comment on Aleksandra Selakovich's talk page. Describing someone as a notorious liar is likely to be construed as a personal attack. Since you describe yourself as an "ambassador of Serbian Wikipedia on English Wikipedia", I'm sure this is not an impression you actually wish to give. Please consider amending your comments, especially the section heading: you could even phrase it as a question to the user, asking her where the department mentioned actually is. It might simply be an error in translation. HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 09:52, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Obradovic, thanks for your support on my RFA. I very much appreciate it. If you ever need anything, don't hesitate to ask. See you around! —thames 18:26, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

from User:Macedonian[edit]

First time I hear that Bitola was mostly populated with Albanians. It seems even funny. My origin (from my father's side) is from Bitola. Ririculous claims... Thanks guys... Macedonian 21:44, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Why not add Croatian and Bosnian languages among those spoken by thee? HolyRomanEmperor 19:48, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :) But I still think that you should state Bosnian and Croatian. wiki:Babel states that your language knowlegde can variate from native to those you should know, but don't. HolyRomanEmperor 21:36, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Zar stvarno misliš, da ako govoriš srpski jezik, ne razumiješ hrvatski i bosanski? (in which of the three languages I wrote just now?) HolyRomanEmperor 21:38, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I know that my curiosity mihght seem a bit aggressive, but I meant nothing bad; only your opinion on the matter (and I am all ears) HolyRomanEmperor 09:40, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. I need to ask you something. What is your knowlegde on the Medieval History of our peoples in here (Rascia, Doclea, Travunia, Zachlumia, Pagania, Bosnia, Dalmatia, Croatia, Pannonia, Slavonia, ...)?

OK, thanks anyway. Tell, do you plan on returning to Bosnia? HolyRomanEmperor 16:52, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Zemun. I am from Karlovac; peasants from my mother's side; large landowners, traders and low (Military Frontier status) noblemen from Lika and the City of Karl. HolyRomanEmperor 15:03, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting posts[edit]

Hi OG, I've left a note for the anon on his talk page. Let me know if he does it again. Cheers, SlimVirgin (talk) 22:06, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I heard that you're translating? Could you (when you have free time) deal with the Pagania article? Here, for the source: [2] HolyRomanEmperor 17:57, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Izvini, ali sam nešto bolestan (neke bakterije), pa neću moći da dođem (jedno vrijeme). HolyRomanEmperor 17:58, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jovan Cvijic.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Jovan Cvijic.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by going to "Your contributions" from your user page and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Agnte 17:17, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, for sure. If you've got the source information then include that and use {{fairusein|Jovan Cvijić}} with that image. Good find! Agnte 21:42, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
If you assert that he painted it, and you know that to be true, then its up to someone else to prove you wrong, so that information is fine to my knowledge :) Agnte 21:59, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Will you have time for it? HolyRomanEmperor 19:23, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Za Neretljane... Ono gore-pomenuto. HolyRomanEmperor 10:51, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Za Neretljane... Ono gore-pomenuto. HolyRomanEmperor 10:53, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Look at this: [3] and put your vote if you can. Thanks in advance. HolyRomanEmperor 12:14, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pih, I need to ask you for another favour: History of Bosnia; vandal User:Emir_Arven has (unexplainingly) deleted my edits. Please revert the vandal's change to my last ([4]) I cannot, it would be 3RR violation. The vandal just said "yes" and deleted important info. HolyRomanEmperor 17:05, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Zastava-cukarica.gif has been listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Zastava-cukarica.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
--Romeo Bravo 20:15, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Zastava-rakovica.gif has been listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Zastava-rakovica.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
--Romeo Bravo 20:17, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Zastava-savskivenac.gif has been listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Zastava-savskivenac.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
--Romeo Bravo 20:18, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Zastava-vracar.gif has been listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Zastava-vracar.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
--Romeo Bravo 20:19, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

sorry[edit]

Hi, someone on the reference desk told me I could ask you something, I hope it doesn't bother you. what does this mean?

smješten na dodiru južne Bukovice i Ravnih Kotara, u sjevernoj Dalmaciji, dio Zadarske županije. Zbog svog zemljopisnog položaja; ini važno prometno sjecište cestovnih pravaca Zadar - Knin, Biograd - Obrovac, Novigrad - Šibenik, te željezni; kog pravca Zadar - Knin. Od gospodarskih grana razvijena je poljoprivreda (sto;arstvo, ratarstvo, vo; arstvo i vinogradarstvo), prerada grož; a, eksploatacija plo;astog kamena, obu; arska i metalna industrija.

thank you. :D

Ok, here goes translation:
It is positioned on the meeting point of the southern Bukovica and Ravni Kotari, in northen Dalmatia, part of Zadar zupanija (zupanija = administrative entity of Croatia). Because of its geographical position; it (?) important trafic juncture of road routes Zadar - Knin, Biograd - Obrovac, Novigrad - Sibenik, then railway; which direction Zadar - Knin. Of economic branches developed are agriculture (cattle, husbandry, orchardry and vineyards), grape processing, stone exploatation, shoemaking industry and metal industry.

It is clear that this section of the text describes some village or town.

Note that text isn't in Serbian, but in Croatian, so I had problem with understanding some parts (hence question mark).

Hope this worked for you. -- Obradović Goran (talk 00:44, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


THANX A LOT!!! :D u have no idea how much this helped! by the way, I'm a 20 year old peruvian. thanx again :)

Don't be so unconfident in your language skills. In the text č is for some arcane reason (I have a few theories) transferred to ; so the word is "čini" and should be translated, of course, as "is". Nikola 08:25, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Belgrade municipality flags[edit]

Hey :) -- Yes, copyright status is one of the reasons for being nominated on IfD, but they are mainly there because they are not used on the en-Wiki. And im spring cleaning 30k images here on en-Wiki. --Romeo Bravo 01:19, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of Arms are usualy PD, but its questionable. Also, I'm not sure if you are the creator, but they seem a bit, child-like in their drawings, or a Microsoft Paint job. (no offence ment if you created them). Flags and Coat of Arms last time I checked can be uploaded to the commons, which would allow useage over all wikis not just en, so might be another idea when they are needed next time. --Romeo Bravo 01:39, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Admin, laughs uh huh... havent tried tho. And good, I didnt think you drew them ;)

--Romeo Bravo 01:54, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Though if you want to nominate me, I wouldnt object :p Romeo Bravo 02:23, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Im not sure, though a question at Village Pump might be appropriate... when i get a transfer from pl or he to en, i usualy tag it {{GFDL-presumed}} --Romeo Bravo 02:05, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Translation Help[edit]

Hi, I'm having a really hard time translating this article from Serbian Wikipedia [5]. The article on here is really needing more information and that seems to the most nicely outlined source. I would greatly appreciate if you could do a quick run-through translation of the article for me and put it on Milhajlo Petrovic-Alas. Even if it is the worst translation you can do - no problem - I will fix up the English to my best ability. Thank you so much. Antidote 21:19, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have an old book (relatively old anyway) called Mathematics: A History of the Contributors (thats a rough translation - it's in German). There was a small section on Alas and it somewhat biased me to believe he is highly unsung. However there aren't many English sources on him online. I remember coming across a very extensive biography excerpt from a Serbian book called "Eleven Serbian Scientists" or something like that. Maybe you've heard of it? I may be remembering wrong. Antidote 21:47, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you so much for your excellent work on Petrovic-Alas! Antidote 03:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The image might be fairurse under the ((art)) tag - which allows for images made after 1923. Not sure when it was painted, but if the other one is more famous then we should use that one anyway. Antidote 03:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I just read your comment about the biography. Though I am a foreign reader (foreign to Serbia), I find the information on the person Petrovic more fulfilling than information on his mathematical achievements, however, I certainly do agree that there should be a section detailing his contributions. I have tried to find some information on this but there are very few free online sources that aren't in Serbian. I can only minimally read Serbian, and thus can only make very poor translations. Being a resident of Belgrade (I'm assuming), your English is unbelievably good. Maybe it's just the Americans/Australians/Canadians who don't know anything but their own native English. Anyway, I have written a biography on another Serbian mathematician, Jovan Karamata, and I am also severely lacking information detailing his contributions. Whenever I get some major free time, I'll try to look up both. Antidote 20:51, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks Obradovic Goran
Thanks for your recent support on my RfA. It passed with a final vote of 24/1/2 :-). If you ever need anything, feel free to leave me a message! --Admrboltz (T | C) 04:28, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Vladimir Velebit.jpg[edit]

Warning sign
This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Vladimir Velebit.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Admrboltz (T | C) 17:46, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is no source information on serbian wiki either... --Admrboltz (T | C) 17:46, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image[edit]

Please, I would like to know the licence of file [6] to add it to copy [7], we had a a problems with it on cs. wiki. Answer me to my disscussion or User talk:Aktron --Aktron 14:35, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion regarding category[edit]

Hello. There is a discussion going on regarding a category you belong to, Amateur Radio Operator. It involves naming and categorization for this and some related categories. Your inputs would be valued. Thank you. --StuffOfInterest 01:35, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We need your help regarding Amateur Radio[edit]

As StuffOfInterest said, please come by Category_talk:Amateur_Radio_Operator where we are discussing how to organize the identification of Amateur Radio Operators written about in and who are users on Wikipedia. Steve Kd4ttc 03:10, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Haradinaj.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Haradinaj.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

—Wknight94 (talk) 04:36, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay but it still doesn't contain source info. It says it came from the Serbian Wikipedia but there's no licensing info there either. See below... —Wknight94 (talk) 12:02, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Haradinaj.jpg[edit]

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Haradinaj.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Wknight94 (talk) 12:02, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Kariba.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Kariba.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Longhair 11:24, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Bata_zivojinovic2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bata_zivojinovic2.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you. -- Carnildo 11:19, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image copyright problem with Image:Una 10 big.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Una 10 big.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Dethomas 18:51, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Milenko.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Milenko.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you. -- Carnildo 10:57, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Petrovic1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Petrovic1.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo.

Image Tagging for Image:Beogradski_maraton.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Beogradski_maraton.png. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 12:30, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Djordjevic.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Djordjevic.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. SteinbDJ 15:03, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arso Jovanović[edit]

Hi, I came across your article on General Jovanović while doing some routine spelling fix-ups. I have tagged it for copy-editting, as I believe it would benefit from some rewording by a native English speaker.

I would be happy to do this over the next few weeks, but I need someone with knowledge of the subject to check that the subject is left unchanged. Do you know of any English language reference material which I could look at around this subject? Dunstan 16:10, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Beograd-vel-grb.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Beograd-vel-grb.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 09:34, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

bs.vikipedija[edit]

Išao sam na bs. vikipediju, pisao članke o tim stvarima, bio napadnut i dobio te izjave od njihovih el-mudžahepedijanaca.--TheFEARgod 13:18, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mehmed Pasa Sokullu[edit]

Gorane, bojim se da će mi trebati vasa pomoć na jednom clanku Mehmed Pasha Sokolović. Vi ste iz Bosne, pa biste mogli to razjasnit. --HolyRomanEmperor 16:24, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You might also find Bosnian Serbs if you'd like to edit whenever you want. --HolyRomanEmperor 17:05, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Djordjevic1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Djordjevic1.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 05:04, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

False Friends of the Slavist[edit]

Please have a look at wikibooks:False Friends of the Slavist. With your language skills, you can help us very much there, though there is not too much to be done. See also wikibooks:Talk:False Friends of the Slavist for details on what is still needed. Thanks in advance! --Daniel Bunčić 18:29, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Tito-Velebit.jpg[edit]

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tito-Velebit.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 02:39, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Bora_todorovic.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bora_todorovic.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 06:38, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Chetnik-officer.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Chetnik-officer.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 14:13, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Desanka1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Desanka1.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 16:37, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Dositej Obradovic.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Dositej Obradovic.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 23:09, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Dragan nikolic.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Dragan nikolic.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 23:52, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ka 25 01.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ka 25 01.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 14:02, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ka 25.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ka 25.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 14:02, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Milena dravic2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Milena dravic2.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 14:36, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:RadeSerbedzija.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:RadeSerbedzija.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 16:03, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article Improvement Belgrade[edit]

You may wish to vote for Belgrade at the Article Improvement Drive page, here. --estavisti 21:57, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation[edit]

Hello! I invite you to join the WikiProject Serbia. All the best, --serbiana - talk 02:48, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:General pukovnik Arso Jovanovic 2.jpg[edit]

Hi, Image:General pukovnik Arso Jovanovic 2.jpg can't be proved to be PD or fair use without us knowing more about where the photo came from. For instance, if it was taken by a news photographer working for a US newspaper, it would be still be under copyright and probably not fair use either. So we need to know the source. Stan 13:21, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ss waffen[edit]

lol samo da se ti se javim

Ako mozes pogledaj clanak o Dobrici Cosicu ovde na engleskm i reci sta mislisDzoni 04:35, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

COTW Project[edit]

You voted for Lipovans, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. -Scottwiki 04:59, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Belgrade is the Current AID Article[edit]

 Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Belgrade was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Posted by (^'-')^ Covington 07:10, 1 May 2006 (UTC) on behalf of the the AID Maintenance Team[reply]

Some Help Needed[edit]

I see you natively speak Serbian and I'm wondering if you could do a word by word translation of the Uros Predic article from the Serbian Wikipedia into English. Here's the linke sr:Урош Предић. It doesn't have to be perfect English - just a rought translation I can use to organize into an article. I'll handle the grammar and spelling. :D Thank you so much. Antidote 19:16, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much :). I'll return the favor whenever you need it. Antidote 12:41, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Regarding your comment on Meta[edit]

I do not think the language is uncommon or insignificant. I just believe that we should focus on the development of the English, German, Chinese, etc. Wikiversities before we start a Serbian language one. --Gray Porpoise 00:16, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please, do not take my vote too harshly. Your opinion matters, too. --Gray Porpoise 16:51, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"But I am afraid that, initially, its viability is limited to the three languages (English, German and French) which have largest Wikipedias." -Hégésippe (under voting for German Wikiversity)
I support the creation of Serbian Wikiversity, just not the immediate creation. As I said two messages ago, I am not denying the language's importance. --Gray Porpoise 17:05, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Church in Rudolfsgnad[edit]

Hi! I had a break, but I'm here now. The Catholic church in Rudolfsgnad was hit by aerial bomb from German airplane unintentionally, and it was leveled in 1948. Luftburger 21:29, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Translation[edit]

Hello! A while ago you signed up to help translate articles from other Wikipedias at Wikipedia:Translators available.

This page has since become obsolete and has been replaced by two userbox templates.

If you are still interested in translating, you may sign up again by using one of the following userboxes on your userpage (while changing, of course, the codes according to the languages you speak): 

   {{Translator|es|Spanish}} 
   {{Proofreader|fr|French}}

We hope to see you soon on Wikipedia:Translation!

Untagged image[edit]

An image you uploaded, Image:Grb-mladenovac.jpg, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 23:30, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Untagged image[edit]

An image you uploaded, Image:Grbshs.jpg, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 08:03, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Grb-Paracin.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Grb-Paracin.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:45, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Grb-obrenovac.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Grb-obrenovac.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:24, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:63rdparachute.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:63rdparachute.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:53, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Random Smiley Award[edit]

For your contributions to Wikipedia and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Award
originated by Pedia-I
(Explanation and Disclaimer)

--TomasBat (Talk) 13:21, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anon. message from user page[edit]

cao, jel moze da se nabavi vektroski grb zemuna, hitno.....matijagligo@yahoo.com

(originally posted by anonymous user on my user page, moved here by me -- Obradović Goran (talk 02:39, 4 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Ја га немам, нити га могу набавити. -- Obradović Goran (talk 02:39, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CRNA RUKA[edit]

Ciao, jel mozes da me kontaktiras na email "sensei [at] crsx.org" imam jedno pitanje u vezi sa poreklom slike koju si zakacio uz stranicu o Crnoj Ruci —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sensei-CRS (talk • contribs) 12:20, 20 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Tomislav Nikolić[edit]

Thanks for fixing my spelling error on Tomislav Nikolić. Perspicacite 01:43, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bguniverzitet.gif)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bguniverzitet.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:27, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Visoki napon[edit]

Thanks for the helpful comments on the matter. Very much appreciated =). Lankiveil (speak to me) 00:11, 17 February 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Dragan Radulović[edit]

Hi! I see you helped out on a recent AfD and I'm asking if you can have a look at this article. It appears from the number sources (linked on Talk:Dragan Radulović that he's notable, but I can't read them to judge. I'm not asking you to work on this article but rather to see if you have any information on the person as to whether he's notable or who I could ask for help on this. I already posted it to WP:CLEANUP but I'm not sure we'll find eds there. Thanks! Travellingcari (talk) 21:33, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your help and information -- it pointed me in the right direction. Have a nice day! Travellingcari (talk) 04:37, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Wikiproject[edit]

Hi Obradovic Goran,

According to your userpage you are an Orienteer.. Please note that we now have WikiProject Orienteering. It would be great if you could join this new Wikiproject and help it expand.

Thanks, Anonymous101 (talk) 05:40, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi[edit]

i like your user page image! you may also want to look at Peters projection which illustrates similar bias present in other maps towards northern hemisphere. 216.80.119.92 (talk) 21:48, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Jovan Cvijic.png[edit]

A tag has been placed on Image:Jovan Cvijic.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [8], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Jovan Cvijic.png|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Todor→Bozhinov 16:22, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Petar Kocic.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Petar Kocic.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 08:31, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kalemegdan01.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kalemegdan01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 22:17, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject TRANSWIKI[edit]

You are invited to join WikiProject TRANSWIKI and join the sub language project of your choice. The aim is to draw up a full directory of missing articles from other wikipedias by language and build a team of translators to work at bridging the gaps in knowledge between other wikipedias. Dr. Blofeld White cat 17:22, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Henry McIver.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Henry McIver.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:37, 25 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:37, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Obradovic Goran! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 975 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Ljubiša Jokić - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:47, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ljubiša Jokić[edit]

The article Ljubiša Jokić has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Fails to meet biography guidelines

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 05:08, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hajduk veljko.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hajduk veljko.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:49, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Goran, you are invited![edit]

Wiki Loves Science[edit]

Hi Goran,

I would be really happy if we could join forces for future "Wiki Loves Science" activities, and possibly a medical version thereof. With a smile, -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 23:06, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Obradovic Goran. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Obradovic Goran. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Obradovic Goran. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Ljubisa Samardzic.jpg[edit]

Notice

The file File:Ljubisa Samardzic.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Milutin Garasanin 2.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Milutin Garasanin 2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 23:25, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been removed from Wikipedia:Local Embassy due to inactivity[edit]

Hi Obradovic Goran! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:Local Embassy, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:Local Embassy.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Obradovic_Goran&oldid=1131510863"