Jump to content

The Report from Iron Mountain

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Report from Iron Mountain
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Published1967
PublisherDial Press

The Report from Iron Mountain is a satirical book written by Leonard C. Lewin and published in 1967.[1] The book purports to be a leaked report, which had been authored by a Special Study Group tasked by the Kennedy Administration to plan the transition from a wartime economy and assess potential social transformations brought about by a "condition of general world peace."[1] It details the analyses of the panel, which concludes that the United States would collapse in the absence of an outside threat: war, or some alternative outside threat, is necessary for social stability, the Study Group finds, and recommends the establishment of "a permanent War/Peace Research Agency" to improve "the effectiveness of [war's] major stabilizing functions" and to plan substitutes for war should "a viable general peace" emerge.[1] The book became a New York Times bestseller and has been translated into fifteen languages. Some conspiracy theorists reject the statement made in 1972 by the author that the book was satire and that he was its author.[2]


Publishing history[edit]

The idea for the report came from Victor Navasky and other editors of Monocle, an American political satire magazine, after reading a newspaper account about a stock market decline attributed to a "peace scare."[3] Leonard Lewin wrote the book with the help of the economist John Kenneth Galbraith and three Monocle editors Marvin Kitman, Richard Lingeman, and Victor Navasky.[4] E. L. Doctorow, who was then editor-in-chief at Dial Press, agreed to publish the book as non-fiction.[5] To lend credibility to the hoax, Galbraith wrote a review of the book under the pen name Herschel McLandress, "former professor of Psychiatric Measurement at the Harvard Medical School and now chief consultant to the Noonan Psychiatric Clinic in Boston," the title character of Galbraith's earlier 1964 satire, The McLandress dimension.[6][7] The Report from Iron Mountain went out of print in 1980.

The book subsequently began circulating on the Internet among militia groups.[8] Buccaneer Books, a small publisher of out-of-print books, brought out an edition in 1993.[citation needed] In the early 1990s, Liberty Lobby with the Noontide Press, a publisher notable for its many antisemitic and white supremacist texts, released an edition, claiming that it was a U.S. government document, and therefore inherently in the public domain, as is conventional for works created by the federal government. Lewin sued them for copyright infringement, which resulted in a settlement in 1994.[8] According to The New York Times, "Neither side would reveal the full terms of the settlement, but Lewin received more than a thousand copies of the bootlegged version."[5]

In response to the bootleg editions, Simon & Schuster brought out a new hardcover edition in 1996 under their Free Press imprint, authorized by Lewin, with a new introduction by Navasky and afterword by Lewin both insisting the book was fictional and satire, and discussing the original controversy over the book and the more recent interest in it by conspiracy theorists.

A new paperback edition was published in 2008.[9]

Contents[edit]

According to the report, a 15-member panel, called the Special Study Group, was set up in 1963 to examine what problems would occur if the United States entered a state of lasting peace. They met at an underground nuclear bunker called Iron Mountain (as well as other, worldwide locations) and worked over the next two years. A member of the panel, one "John Doe", a professor at a college in the Midwest, decided to release the report to the public.

The heavily footnoted report concluded that peace was not in the interest of a stable society, that even if lasting peace "could be achieved, it would almost certainly not be in the best interests of society to achieve it." War was a part of the economy. Therefore, it was necessary to conceive a state of war for a stable economy. The government, the group theorized, would not exist without war, and nation states existed in order to wage war. War served the vital function of diverting collective aggression. They recommended "credible substitutes" and paying a "blood price" to emulate the economic functions of war. Prospective government-devised alternatives to war included reports of alien life-forms, the reintroduction of a "euphemized form" of slavery "consistent with modern technology and political processes", and – one deemed particularly promising in gaining the attention of the malleable masses – the threat of "gross pollution of the environment".

Reaction by Lyndon Johnson[edit]

U.S. News & World Report claimed in its November 20, 1967, issue to have confirmation of the reality of the report from an unnamed government official, who added that when President Johnson read the report, he 'hit the roof' and ordered it to be suppressed for all time. Additionally, sources were said to have revealed that orders were sent to U.S. embassies, instructing them to emphasize that the book had no relation to U.S. Government policy.[10]

Authenticity[edit]

When it was first published, controversy surrounded the book over the question whether it was a hoax or real. In an article in the March 19, 1972, edition of The New York Times Book Review, Lewin said that he had written the book.[11]

The book was listed in the Guinness Book of World Records as the "Most Successful Literary Hoax." Some people claim that the book is genuine and has only been called a hoax as a means of damage control. Trans-Action devoted an issue to the debate over the book. Esquire magazine published a 28,000-word excerpt.[5]

In a remembrance of E. L. Doctorow published in 2015 in The Nation, Victor Navasky asserted his involvement in creating Report from Iron Mountain, naming Leonard Lewin as the main writer with "input" from economist John Kenneth Galbraith, two editors of the satirical magazine Monocle (Marvin Kitman and Richard Lingeman) and himself. [12]

Purported statements made by John Kenneth Galbraith in support of authenticity[edit]

On November 26, 1967, the report was reviewed in the book section of The Washington Post by Herschel McLandress, supposedly the pen name for Harvard professor John Kenneth Galbraith. McLandress wrote that he knew firsthand of the report's authenticity because he had been invited to participate in its creation; that although he was unable to be part of the official group, he was consulted from time to time and had been asked to keep the project secret; and that while he doubted the wisdom of letting the public know about the report, he agreed totally with its conclusions.

He wrote: "As I would put my personal repute behind the authenticity of this document, so would I testify to the validity of its conclusions. My reservation relates only to the wisdom of releasing it to an obviously unconditioned public."[13]

Six weeks later, in an Associated Press dispatch from London, Galbraith went even further and jokingly admitted that he was a member of the conspiracy.[14] The following day, Galbraith backed off. When asked about his 'conspiracy' statement, he replied: "For the first time since Charles II The Times has been guilty of a misquotation... Nothing shakes my conviction that it was written by either Dean Rusk or Mrs. Clare Boothe Luce".[15]

The original reporter reported the following six days later: "Misquoting seems to be a hazard to which Professor Galbraith is prone. The latest edition of the Cambridge newspaper Varsity quotes the following (tape recorded) interchange: Interviewer: 'Are you aware of the identity of the author of Report from Iron Mountain?' Galbraith: 'I was in general a member of the conspiracy, but I was not the author. I have always assumed that it was the man who wrote the foreword – Mr. Lewin'."[16]

In an article published in New York in 2013, Victor Navasky asserted that Galbraith was indeed McLandress, and that he was "in on the hoax from the beginning."[17]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Lewsin, Leonard C. (1967). Report from Iron Mountain on the possibility and desirability of peace. Dell Pub. Co. p. 8, 94.
  2. ^ Goldman, Andrew (November 22, 2012). "Oliver Stone Rewrites History". The New York Times. Archived from the original on June 26, 2017. Retrieved February 13, 2017.
  3. ^ Robert S. Boynton (May 13, 1996). "A Lefty Reunion". The New Yorker. p. 36.
  4. ^ "So Long, E.L. Doctorow, It's Been Good to Know Yuh". The Nation. July 30, 2015.
  5. ^ a b c Kifner, John (January 30, 1999). "L. C. Lewin, Writer of Satire Of Government Plot, Dies at 82". The New York Times. p. A.11. Archived from the original on January 28, 2017. Retrieved February 13, 2017.
  6. ^ Mark Epernay (pseudonym of John Kenneth Galbraith) (1964). The McLandress dimension. Hamish Hamilton.
  7. ^ Lake, Ellen (December 4, 1963). "Prof. McLandress: The McLandress Dimension, by Mark Epernay Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., $3.75". The Harvard Crimson.
  8. ^ a b Carvajal, Doreen (July 1, 1996). "Onetime Political Satire Becomes a Right-Wing Rage and a Hot Internet Item". The New York Times.
  9. ^ Report From Iron Mountain. Simon & Schuster. 28 July 2008. ISBN 9781439123119.
  10. ^ '"Hoax of Horror? A Book That Shook White House", U.S. News & World Report, November 20, 1967
  11. ^ Leonard Lewin, "Report From Iron Mountain, 'The Guest Word'" Archived 2008-11-22 at the Wayback Machine, The New York Times Book Review, March 19, 1972
  12. ^ Navasky, Victor (2015). "E.L. Doctorow, 1931-2015". The Nation. 301 (7&8): 4. Archived from the original on August 12, 2015. Retrieved August 11, 2015.
  13. ^ "News of War and Peace You're Not Ready For", by Herschel McLandress. Book World, in The Washington Post, November 26, 1967, p. 5.
  14. ^ "The Times Diary", The Times, February 5, 1968, p. 8.
  15. ^ "Gailbraith Says He Was Misquoted", The Times, February 6, 1968, p. 3.
  16. ^ "Touche, Professor", The Times, February 12, 1968, p. 8.
  17. ^ Navasky, Victor (November 15, 2013). "Conspiracy Theory Is a Hoax Gone Wrong". New York Magazine. Retrieved June 26, 2021.

External links[edit]