User talk:Clearfrienda

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
👤 User 💬 Talk 🗂️ Archives ✏️ Contributions 📄 Drafts 🔎 Articles created 🔧 Maintenance ✉️ Email me

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:String Quartets, Op. 20 (Haydn) on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: WikiProjects and collaborations request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Did you know on a "WikiProjects and collaborations" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 May 2024[edit]

"Notability"[edit]

You deleted an entire page that had been up for months because you stated that it "needed more sources to establish notability". There are 9 sources, all either major publications discussing the subject or well-known nonprofits and large government organizations.

Please state exactly why you believe that an article that has well exceeded the notability measure of other recently-created articles does not establish 'notability'. DenverCoder19 (talk) 22:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, this is my fault. Imran Ahmed (strategist) is notable. I meant to draftify a page on another tab. I've moved it back and marked it as reviewed.
Sorry for the trouble,
Clearfrienda 💬 22:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All good, appreciate it. There will always be false negatives if we're doing our job. DenverCoder19 (talk) DenverCoder19 (talk) 22:49, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Clearfrienda, can you please state which sources make this article notable? I couldn't find any (see the discussion on talk) the sources are not independent or significant coverage. (t · c) buidhe 00:11, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Buidhe: There's probably enough significant coverage online to meet WP:GNG. Notably, there's this Financial Times article and this CNBC article which are about him and for the most part independent. There are also quite a few WP:INTERVIEWS with him that offer enough coverage outside of the transcript, like this Independent article and this CBC article . This article is mainly about him. There is this post on the Canadian Women's Foundation. There's also a lot of less-significant coverage in articles like this one. There are more trivial mentions in lots of articles like this one and this one. There are some non-independent references listed, like the article he wrote for The Guardian and some of his interviews, but I don't really see how his notability is contested. That being said, I've marked it as unreviewed until this is resolved. Clearfrienda 💬 00:48, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]