User talk:MasqueDesRonces
A belated welcome![edit]
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, MasqueDesRonces. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Editor's index to Wikipedia
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.
Again, welcome! BilCat (talk) 21:06, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Does this article need quite so many illustrations?[edit]
I wanted to thank you for your recent contribution to the Erotic humiliation article. I'd also like to express my sympathy at the way you were treated by the third editor involved. The editor in question was not particularly WP:CIVIL in his tone to you. I also do not agree with the decision to abruptly revert your edit, particularly as there was an ongoing discussion and you were not given the opportunity of replying first. You had raised the idea over a month before and it had received no objections, but instead some indirect support from me. I agree with everything you wrote on the article's talk page. However, the editor's position seems to be a form of skepticism requiring an impossible level of proof over a value judgement, combined with an apparent view that WP:NOTCENSORED trumps everything. I've come across this sort of thing before, and I've usually found it difficult to overcome. Attracting a large enough number of other voices to achieve consensus is difficult with an obscure topic such as this. And involving an Admin is usually more trouble than it's worth. So like you, I'm going to leave this article to others. I just wanted to reassure you of the quality of your contribution and tell you that WP could do with more editors like you. - Polly Tunnel (talk) 13:59, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Polly Tunnel: Thank you, I really appreciate it. Ideally this sort of thing would be treated no differently than any other form of WP:FANCRUFT, but I'm not at all surprised to hear it isn't. The difference between uncensored and needlessly prurient is a hard one to pin down without making the kind of value judgments that the more punctilious editors bristle at, and I don't think I'll ever have the patience to argue the specifics of policy with that kind of person. Thanks again for the kind words, —MasqueDesRonces (talk) 16:58, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
From Your Student[edit]
Thank you so much for Teaching me, Sir! And let me know where I am going wrong in Link citation! — Preceding unsigned comment added by GavinBechtold (talk • contribs) 11:42, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- With the best will in the world, I suspect you already know what you're doing wrong, which is inserting links to irrelevant, recently created websites in random articles in order to boost their SEO. --MasqueDesRonces (talk) 12:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)