User talk:Mrcat75

I appreciate that you have been scammed[edit]

I also appreciate that this is upsetting and that you have lost money, perhaps a substantial sum.

Looking at your most recent behaviour, you have let yourself down and left a nasty taste in the mouths of editors who have been trying to offer you advice and assistance.

Leave your emotions at the door, please, and cease making accusations. These are real people whom you are accusing of unpleasant behaviour. Even your message when blanking this page is not courteous.

Behave as a colleague, please or consider whether Wikipedia is a place for you. If it is a place for you then direct and simple apologies to everyone whom you have wronged may put this right. You choose how you behave. Choose to behave well. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I'm just finding this very upsetting, Thanks again for your time EUFilm (talk) 15:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest that you take a few days to yourself. Nothing is urgent on Wikipedia. A period of consolidation and quietude is something you may find beneficial 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to sort things out. I say as User:See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d said to me this morning, he will make sure that I will never have a page under my name EUFilm (talk) 22:16, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Timtrent, thank you. The editor is CU-confirmed with User talk:Film Ireland, of course, but their username is just as unacceptable. EUFilm, if you wish to achieve anything here you will have to request another username. Even with the block I'm about to place below, you can do that. And that process might give you a minute in which to ponder all these accusations you made. There is one scammer, and that's User:See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d; they may have disclosed that they were paid, but they did not produce anything decent at all. But there is more than one victim: I'm also counting editors like GSS and Theroadislong--and I'm wondering if you weren't accusing me of being a scammer in this edit. Anyway, you've gotten all the advice you need at the Teahouse and here. Choose a username that does not look promotional or corporate and that suggests there's one single person using it. It does not have to be a real name. Drmies (talk) 15:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh I for got to say, taking your advice I requested another username. Thanks for the tip, I am really lost here and I don't want to make enemies, I just wanted to sort the problem with my page. Thanks for the tip. Every step it takes me a google search so please do not block me EUFilm (talk) 22:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GSS and Theroadislonsorry about my accusations this morning, I genuinely was very frustrated to discover I was scammed. EUFilm (talk) 22:19, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your account has been blocked from editing because your username gives the impression that the account represents a group, club, organization, company, or website. Your username is the principal reason for the block. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable, regardless of the username that you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid or compensated in any way, you must disclose who is paying you to edit here. You may also read our FAQ for article subjects

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change. The new username that you choose must represent you as an individual person, and it must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.

To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then make a new one.
If you prefer to change the username on this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page (this page): {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it also identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Appeals: If your username does not represent a group, organization, website, or other entity described above, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Drmies you block me by mistake twice, I do not represent any groups. I am a individual who was not aware 1 how wikipedia works, 2 I didn't genuinely know that you couldn't pay a person to do your page, I have many friends with less films that have a page and I thought I would do one for myself, I found it complicated and time consuming so I put an ad in upwork as I have used this space before.

I would like to know if you are going to block all my attempts to edit the page, the reason I accused you is simply because User:See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d told me this morning I would never be able to have a Wikipedia page under my name and it seemed too weird that you blocked my page twice. My apologies if you are not the same person but I was very frustrated this morning EUFilm (talk) 22:10, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Plainly Drmies issued a block for a policy based reason. They even said so, above Equally plainly you have not yet reached an equilibrium after your loss of money to an unpleasant scammer. When you reach equilibrium, which may take a day or two, please edit without complaint. Every complaint you make has the sting in the tail of an accusation.

I see you have your new user name. Good. What you have not achieved is being unblocked. If only you had followed the instructions in the big blue box just up there you would not be blocked still. Since I've pinged Drmies in this note I feel it is probable that they will drop by and take action.

I think you owe them an apology. See what they say here: But there is more than one victim: I'm also counting editors like GSS and Theroadislong--and I'm wondering if you weren't accusing me of being a scammer in this edit.

While you are apologising, and I mean apologising, not dissembling, GSS and Theroadislong each deserve to hear a real apology. "I genuinely was very frustrated to discover I was scammed" does not apologise. It offers justification; There is no justification for the behaviour you exhibited.

Making these apologies, proper apologies, ones made with humility and contrition, should be your second priority. Your first priority must be to request an unblock.

Why am I taking so much trouble to guide you? I am doing it because you deserve the chance to wipe the slate clean here, principally because you have been scammed. I have a threshold, however, where I will lose interest. You are close to that threshold, Please do not cross it. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand: the block template says very clearly, "Your username is the principal reason for the block." It says it in bold print. And I still don't understand what you are accusing me of, and why, in part because so many of those comments you made are incoherent or strangely formatted/indented. Are you now accusing me of being SeeNeverMind? How else am I to read "My apologies if you are not the same person"? And I didn't block you because you paid someone to write up your resume--I blocked you from editing for the very simple reason that your username doesn't meet our very simple requirements. To put all that together, I really do not think you understand how this works, and you haven't followed the proper procedures for anything. If you wish to edit here (and actually I have no reason to think you are here for anything besides your own article/resume), you will have to prove that you are capable of following our guidelines and policies. I don't need an apology since I don't believe in forced apologies, but you will have to a. post a proper COI template on your user page, following WP:DISCLOSE, and b. post a proper unblock template, following the rules in the template above. Some other administrator will see if you did so correctly; please do not ping me. Drmies (talk) 18:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]