User talk:Rahio1234

This is Rahio1234's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

June 2024[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Wikipedia:Sandbox, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. I'm just placing this warning for you as you need to stop doing what you've been doing on Wikipedia:Sandbox. This type of repeated instantaneous reverts when people are trying to use the sandbox that you've been doing to other people is not allowed. Ergzay (talk) 04:17, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ergzay The sandboxs may be reset by users and bots. I recommended use your own sandbox. Rahio 1234 07:06, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rahio1234 Yes, but intentionally "trolling" by repeatedly resetting a sandbox when it was in the middle of use is a form of disruptive editing. Do not continue to do so. You cannot revert someone's changes to sandbox and then try to claim they're "edit warring" when they continue to try to use it. You do not "own" the sandbox. Stop trying to claim ownership of it. Ergzay (talk) 10:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Rahio1234 reported by User:Ergzay (Result: ). Thank you. Ergzay (talk) 11:06, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Using {{One source}} and {{More citations needed}} templates in Twinkle on stub pages[edit]

Hi Rahio1234, I reverted several of your changes on several stub pages where you added citation templates. As the instructions on {{one source}} state:

Citing only one source is not a violation of any policy.  Consider not adding this tag to stubs, articles that are being actively expanded, or articles that have no apparent problems with verifiability and neutrality.

I would suggest that you not add those templates to stub pages that don't seem to have obvious issues with their verifiability or neutrality. Those pages need to be expanded, not have additional sources added for their already slim content. Ergzay (talk) 15:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Harrassment[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's harassment policy, as you did at User:Ergzay, you may be blocked from editing. Your recent edits [1] [2] on my user page, blanking it and then reverting it are harrasment. Do not do that. Ergzay (talk) 16:37, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Ergzay (talk) 17:25, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no, What happened Rahio 1234 07:21, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your user talk page (this page) is not the forum to discuss an issue that is at WP:ANI. If you don't know what happened (but you do know what happened), you can look at WP:ANI, and you should look at WP:ANI anyway. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 14:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rahio1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedians I have been blocked for some reason. Please unblock my account, Rahio 1234 15:12, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Bbb23 (talk) 15:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.