Talk:ETC Group (eco-justice)

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

NPOV?[edit]

"Biotechnology: A variety of techniques that involve the use and manipulation of living organisms to make commercial products. These techniques include cell culture, tissue culture, embryo transfer, and recombinant DNA technology (genetic engineering). ETC group focuses on the social and economic impacts of new biotechnologies. ETC group is not fundamentally opposed to genetic engineering, but we have profound concerns about the way it is being foisted upon the world. In the current social, economic and political context, genetic engineering is not safe, and involves unacceptable levels of risk to people and the environment. For ETC group, the fundamental issue is control."

"We"? Is this article copy-pasted from ETC, or written by ETC? Either way, it seems extensive review/rewriting is needed. At the least, could someone please put an appropriate banner on this article? (Something about NPOV?) I'm not familiar enough with Wikipedia to know which banner would be appropriate. -Mysterius 07:34, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Four of the five references cited as "fact" are ETC publications and the fifth is a paid article that quotes ETC as a source. There is no independent verification of any of the statements here. 96.35.172.222 (talk) 21:35, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"to now think those same people will correct the climate crisis and the biosphere is little bit naïve." wheres your source? is this your point of view or hers? (sort it out) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.190.102.6 (talk) 20:35, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]