User talk:Annh07

Archives (Index)

2024/February 2024/March 2024/May

edits

Why is my page not taken? M NASIR IRFAN KHAN (talk) 15:56, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi @M NASIR IRFAN KHAN,

Your draft has no indication of significance, no context, no improvement after previous rejection. Also it looks like you are writing about yourself, please review the autobiography policy. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 16:09, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

I want to create a page of my name that contains everything about me M NASIR IRFAN KHAN (talk) 17:14, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi @M NASIR IRFAN KHAN,

We always want new editors here on Wikipedia, but the encyclopaedia is not a place to promote yourself or your project. If you there is enough independent coverage about what you're doing, it might indeed be appropriate for there to be an article about you, but it would need to be written neutrally rather than promotionally, not include external links to your work, and be written by someone with no connection to you. That last point is crucial; no one should be making an article about themselves. Please read WP:COI. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 17:27, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	AIV, UAA, spam clean up and anti-vandalism — your efforts don’t go unnoticed. – DreamRimmer (talk) 18:17, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks so much for the barnstar :). -- Annh07 (talk) 18:54, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Hey!Annh07, Hello and Thank you removing Vandalism from my usertalkpage. ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 07:43, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

You're welcome! :) -- Annh07 (talk) 08:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Re:Not providing reliable sources

Hello @Annh07 I saw that you reverted my edits in the José Raúl Mulino article,

• first of all, i'm from Panama, I saw the elections and so I have knowledge about topic.
• Second of all, I translated that from the Spanish Wikipedia.
• third of all, the Spanish Wikipedia was just providing footnotes (I don't know a lot of footnotes because I don't use them) so I didn't place them in the article.

Last of all, i'm not trying to start a edit war, or a discussion, just wanted you to know this points, have a good day.

15:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi @W!kipedista. Yes, I reverted your edits in the José Raúl Mulino article because it was completely unsourced.

Some bold edits are required by Wikipedia policies for example unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion (see WP:BLPSOURCE). With some bold edits the reversal of the edit can only be made if the version reverted to includes a citation from a reliable source (see WP:PROVEIT).

Usually, if someone reverts your bold changes, then discuss the proposed changes on the article's talk page and reach a consensus for the changes before reverting a revert (see How consensus emerges during the editing process). Happy editing! Annh07 (talk) 15:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Ok, understood, thanks for responding, happy editing! 13:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Sky-Watch

Hi Annh07,

I tried to update the Sky-Watch page to reflect current management team and products. It seems you reverted it. I am not sure why, the information currently published is not correct. Please let me know what I can do to make sure the information provide reflects what the correct company information Tje-sky-watch (talk) 18:07, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

@Tje-sky-watch: Your were informed on your user talk page why your edits were unacceptable. I suggest you read the comments there. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Tje-sky-watch. Get this straight, because you have a conflict of interest with Sky-Watch, you should not directly edit articles about this organization (see WP:COI), all edits must be through the article's talk page, please use this template: Edit COI. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 18:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

@Tje-sky-watch. In addition, you should not add promotional materials to the article nor remove existing references. Please read WP:ADS. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 18:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

User Guhyjlkm

I'm not sure what the next steps are to take with regards to this editor. Do you have any ideas? Regards, Kiwipete (talk) 18:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

@Kiwipete. I have sent them a final warning. If they continue, report them at AIV. Annh07 (talk) 18:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

End of world war 2

The Italians ,the defeat,resisters.The liberation of the concentration camps Mosa2121 (talk) 11:55, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

@Mosa2121. What do you want to discuss? If you want to add content to the article again, please provide a reliable source. In addition, you should not copy text from elsewhere (most sources are copyrighted materials). Please review the policies and guidelines on your talk page. If you need help, please post a question at Tea house. Annh07 (talk) 19:27, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

User:152.58.72.246

Thanks for your report. You mentioned block evasion. What other addresses or accounts are involved? Jake Wartenberg (talk) 17:36, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

@Jake Wartenberg. You can see Gulab Chand Kataria's page history, many IPs have been blocked for similar behavior. I also requested temporary page protection. Annh07 (talk) 17:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

I've semi-protected the page. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 17:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. They made too many worthless edits, causing the history of the article to become unnecessarily bloated. Annh07 (talk) 18:22, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

John Singer Sargent

Why did you revert my edit regarding the movie? "Link spam" does not explain it. The link was not an advertisement. Maurice Magnus (talk) 11:19, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Maurice Magnus. That link was posted by an editor with a conflict of interest: ExhibitionOnScreen – they based their username on Exhibition On Screen (see the about page on their website). They spammed their site in many articles. You should also visit their talk page to see the discussions. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 12:20, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

But I reposted it independently of that person. I have no conflict of interest. Maurice Magnus (talk) 12:25, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Of course you can restore the content because you have no conflict of interest. However, if you can find a better and more independent source, you should replace it. Annh07 (talk) 12:49, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

I restored it and added a link to an independent source, namely a review in The Guardian. But I see no reason to delete the official source. Of course, it promotes the film, but it also contains information about it. Maurice Magnus (talk) 14:53, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

thetruthlies website

Hello, I had recently added a website as a reference to the Black ops 6 Wikipedia page under marketing and you seemed to revert the page giving the reason "not needed". I apologize if I find it unclear as to the reason why you reverted as I am new to Wikipedia editing. But I think the website could be needed if people would like to preview the marketing material used. I do understand that the website could possibly be a temporary website. TheOminousBlade (talk) 19:57, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi @TheOminousBlade. Your edit is not adding a reference, you are actually just providing an external link to a website as a reference. The purpose of references is to help readers verify the content in the article – what is stated in the article must be cited from reliable published sources (see Wikipedia:Verifiability). When adding references, you must provide a specific link to the page containing the source material, not just a link to its home page, which is not helpful to the reader because they need to verify information, not learning about that website. I encourage you to read Help:Referencing for beginners and Wikipedia:Citing sources. Happy editing! Annh07 (talk) 21:31, 26 May 2024 (UTC)