Talk:List of European Court of Justice rulings

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

European Union (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Dortmund#City government past and present|City of Dortmund]] The anchor (#City government past and present) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Darı&Tüm vs UK[edit]

There is a recent notable decision of the court, letting Turkish people -even if they are illegal aliens who seek for asylum- to establish business in the EU without any work permit obligations. It is also a sign that the current visa practice against Turkish citizens is illegal. Here are the links:

http://www.turkishdailynews.com.tr/article.php?enewsid=84164 http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=122846

Do you think it should be added here as a notable decision? --212.31.0.50 14:52, 25 September 2007 (UTC)♠[reply]

The Cassis de Dijon case of 1979 gets very little coverage on this page of ECJ major rulings; the way all of my textbooks refer to, I am surprised. Should it not have a bigger write up?

See this page for more details on the case: http://www.kevinboone.com/lawglos_CassisDeDijon1979.html

Better organisation?[edit]

Hello everyone, there's got to be a better way of organising this page, no? The 2004 list of pre-accession cases is useful, but the rest above is not. The problem is that we can't really have a complete list of cases, as there are about 1500 a year in the CJEU (but maybe with the Grand Chamber?). So it's hard to do something like UKSC cases or SCOTUS cases - it'd just be too long. The problem then is how to define what's notable, as most simply are not. But some chronology would be better. Thoughts very welcome. Wik idea 14:16, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikidea, I would prefer to see the fifty-seven pre-accession cases integrated into the body of the article according to the subject matter covered, but with an asterick or some other marker to indicate that they belong to the list of 57. BobKilcoyne (talk) 09:19, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]