Jump to content

User talk:JackkBrown

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Re: Cappuccino; bagna càuda[edit]

Hi, I'm fine thanks. I don't know: on Italian Wikipedia both are described as originating from Italy. Sources would be needed to clarify their origin. LukeWiller (talk) 14:35, 27 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Quick CheckUser request[edit]

If I were you, I'd revert your request because it doesn't belong there. If you read the instructions, it says "Use this section to request checkuser information relating to a situation that does not involve sock puppetry." As a matter of procedure, I'll let a CheckUser close your request if you don't revert yourself.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: and where can I do this? JacktheBrown (talk) 15:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You file a normal report at SPI. Follow the instructions on the page to do so if you've never done it before, although you can also use Twinkle.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:59, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposals[edit]

When you propose a merge, please be sure to tag both articles. I've added the tag to Ciambella for you. Thanks! Schazjmd (talk) 16:58, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dead links[edit]

You don't need to remove dead links if the source has been archived at archive.org. Use the [archive tags] in Template:Cite web. --Macrakis (talk) 19:06, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Macarons[edit]

I added a dispute resolution but can you look it up? There is a link that kept reverting the edits and I don't think it's in good faith, as it even deleted Larousse Gastronomy from the text making it vague but keeping the link, whose text he ignored ( it says Macarons have two possible origins, Italy and France). Now the page is protected with the possibly bad version being currently on 62.211.155.242 (talk) 08:51, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see you made some useful modifications yet the utent bad faith modifications are still there 62.211.155.242 (talk) 15:35, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate PRODs[edit]

Please stop making inappropriate PRODs such as your latest, this, on a cardinal. These are wasting everyone's time. Notability is not determined by the state of an article but by the existence and availability of sourcing on the subject, which means looking for it - something you clearly aren't bothering to do. You've been here more than long enough to have realised this. Ingratis (talk) 17:02, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]