Talk:The rationality of atheism: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
Larry_Sanger (talk) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't know what you think of my changes, but I think it's essential that this kind of page not talk simply about what "theists" and "atheists" say. We need to talk about the views of particular philosophers, and attribute the ideas to somebody. This will help us ground the text in something more than our own ideas, and will provide information about what real philosophers have actually said on the subject. |
I don't know what you think of my changes, but I think it's essential that this kind of page not talk simply about what "theists" and "atheists" say. We need to talk about the views of particular philosophers, and attribute the ideas to somebody. This will help us ground the text in something more than our own ideas, and will provide information about what real philosophers have actually said on the subject. |
||
:You're absolutely right, of course. Thanks! |
|||
Obviously it's not done, and I don't even know if this is the right direction to go with an article like this -- you'd never find this in a traditional encyclopedia -- but I hope I've added something helpful. |
Obviously it's not done, and I don't even know if this is the right direction to go with an article like this -- you'd never find this in a traditional encyclopedia -- but I hope I've added something helpful. |
||
:A version of this article might eventually find its way into a traditional encyclopedia, though. --[[LMS]] |
|||
Revision as of 03:38, 17 July 2001
I don't know what you think of my changes, but I think it's essential that this kind of page not talk simply about what "theists" and "atheists" say. We need to talk about the views of particular philosophers, and attribute the ideas to somebody. This will help us ground the text in something more than our own ideas, and will provide information about what real philosophers have actually said on the subject.
- You're absolutely right, of course. Thanks!
Obviously it's not done, and I don't even know if this is the right direction to go with an article like this -- you'd never find this in a traditional encyclopedia -- but I hope I've added something helpful.
- A version of this article might eventually find its way into a traditional encyclopedia, though. --LMS