Mott–Bethe formula: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:02, 17 May 2021

The Mott–Bethe formula is an approximation used to calculate atomic electron scattering form factors, $f_{e}(q,Z)$ , from atomic X-ray scattering form factors, $f_{x}(q,Z)$ .^[1]^[2]^[3] The formula was derived independently by Hans Bethe and Neville Mott both in 1930,^[4]^[5] and simply follows from applying the first Born approximation for the scattering of electrons via the Coulomb interaction together with the Poisson equation for the charge density of an atom (including both the nucleus and electron cloud) in the Fourier domain.^[4]^[5] Following the first Born approximation,

$f_{e}(q,Z)={\frac {me^{2}}{32\pi ^{3}\hbar ^{2}\epsilon _{0}}}{\Bigg (}{\frac {Z-f_{x}(q,Z)}{q^{2}}}{\Bigg )}={\frac {1}{8\pi ^{2}a_{0}}}{\Bigg (}{\frac {Z-f_{x}(q,Z)}{q^{2}}}{\Bigg )}\approx (0.2393{\textrm {nm}}^{-1})\cdot {\Bigg (}{\frac {Z-f_{x}(q,Z)}{q^{2}}}{\Bigg )}$

Here, $q$ is the magnitude of the scattering vector of momentum-transfer cross section in reciprocal space (in units of inverse distance), $Z$ the atomic number of the atom, $\hbar$ is Planck's constant, $\epsilon _{0}$ is the vacuum permittivity, and $m_{0}$ is the electron rest mass, $a_{0}$ is the Bohr Radius, and $f_{x}(q,Z)$ is the dimensionless X-ray scattering form factor for the electron density.

The electron scattering factor $f_{e}(q,Z)$ has units of length, as is typical for the scattering factor, unlike the X-ray form factor $f_{x}(q,Z)$ which is usually presented in dimensionless units. To perform a one-to-one comparison between the electron and X-ray form factors in the same units, the X-ray form factor should be multiplied by the square root of the Thomson cross section ${\sqrt {\sigma _{T}}}=r_{e}$ , where $r_{e}$ is the classical electron radius, to convert it back to a unit of length.

The Mott–Bethe formula was originally derived for free atoms, and is rigorously true provided the X-ray scattering form factor is known exactly. However, in solids, the accuracy of the Mott–Bethe formula is best for large values of $q$ ( $q>0.5$ Å^-1) because the distribution of the charge density at smaller $q$ (i.e. long distances) can deviate from the atomic distribution of electrons due the chemical bonds between atoms in a solid.^[2] For smaller values of $q$ , $f_{e}(q,Z)$ can be determined from tabulated values, such as those in the International Tables for Crystallography using (non)relativistic Hartee Fock calculations,^[1]^[6] or other numerical parameterizations of the calculated charge distribution of atoms.^[2]

References

^ ^a ^b Cowley, J. M. (2006). "Electron diffraction and electron microscopy in structure determination". International Tables for Crystallography. B: 276–345. doi:10.1107/97809553602060000558. ISBN 978-0-7923-6592-1 – via Wiley Library.
^ ^a ^b ^c Lobato, I.; Van Dyck, D. (2014-11-01). "An accurate parameterization for scattering factors, electron densities and electrostatic potentials for neutral atoms that obey all physical constraints". Acta Crystallographica Section A. 70 (6): 636–649. doi:10.1107/S205327331401643X. hdl:10067/1221030151162165141. ISSN 2053-2733.
^ Kirkland, Earl J. (17 April 2013). Advanced Computing in Electron Microscopy. ISBN 978-1475744064.
^ ^a ^b Mott, Nevill Francis; Bragg, William Lawrence (1930-06-02). "The scattering of electrons by atoms". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character. 127 (806): 658–665. doi:10.1098/rspa.1930.0082.
^ ^a ^b Bethe, H. (1930). "Zur Theorie des Durchgangs schneller Korpuskularstrahlen durch Materie". Annalen der Physik. 397 (3): 325–400. doi:10.1002/andp.19303970303. ISSN 1521-3889.
^ High-Energy Electron Diffraction and Microscopy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 2004. ISBN 9780198500742. {{cite book}}: Cite uses deprecated parameter |authors= (help)

[:0-1] Cowley, J. M. (2006). "Electron diffraction and electron microscopy in structure determination". International Tables for Crystallography. B: 276–345. doi:10.1107/97809553602060000558. ISBN 978-0-7923-6592-1 – via Wiley Library.

[:3-2] Lobato, I.; Van Dyck, D. (2014-11-01). "An accurate parameterization for scattering factors, electron densities and electrostatic potentials for neutral atoms that obey all physical constraints". Acta Crystallographica Section A. 70 (6): 636–649. doi:10.1107/S205327331401643X. hdl:10067/1221030151162165141. ISSN 2053-2733.

[3] Kirkland, Earl J. (17 April 2013). Advanced Computing in Electron Microscopy. ISBN 978-1475744064.

[:1-4] Mott, Nevill Francis; Bragg, William Lawrence (1930-06-02). "The scattering of electrons by atoms". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character. 127 (806): 658–665. doi:10.1098/rspa.1930.0082.

[:2-5] Bethe, H. (1930). "Zur Theorie des Durchgangs schneller Korpuskularstrahlen durch Materie". Annalen der Physik. 397 (3): 325–400. doi:10.1002/andp.19303970303. ISSN 1521-3889.

[6] High-Energy Electron Diffraction and Microscopy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 2004. ISBN 9780198500742. {{cite book}}: Cite uses deprecated parameter |authors= (help)

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-The '''Mott–Bethe formula''' is an approximation used to calculate atomic [[electron scattering]] [[Atomic form factor|form factor]]s, <math>f_e (q,Z)</math>, from atomic [[X-ray scattering]] form factors, <math>f_x(q,Z)</math>.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Cowley|first=J. M.|date=2006|title=Electron diffraction and electron microscopy in structure determination|url=https://doi.org/10.1107/97809553602060000558|journal=International Tables for Crystallography|volume=B|pages=276–345|via=Wiley Library}}</ref><ref name=":3" /><ref>{{cite book|title=Advanced Computing in Electron Microscopy|ISBN=1475744064}}</ref> The formula was derived independently by [[Hans Bethe]] and [[Nevill Francis Mott|Neville Mott]] both in 1930,<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last=Mott|first=Nevill Francis|last2=Bragg|first2=William Lawrence|date=1930-06-02|title=The scattering of electrons by atoms|url=https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.1930.0082|journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character|volume=127|issue=806|pages=658–665|doi=10.1098/rspa.1930.0082|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|last=Bethe|first=H.|date=1930|title=Zur Theorie des Durchgangs schneller Korpuskularstrahlen durch Materie|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/andp.19303970303|journal=Annalen der Physik|language=en|volume=397|issue=3|pages=325–400|doi=10.1002/andp.19303970303|issn=1521-3889}}</ref> and simply follows from applying the [[Born approximation|first Born approximation]] for the scattering of electrons via the [[Coulomb interaction]] together with the [[Poisson's equation|Poisson equation]] for the charge density of an atom (including both the nucleus and electron cloud) in the Fourier domain.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /> Following the first [[Born approximation]],
+The '''Mott–Bethe formula''' is an approximation used to calculate atomic [[electron scattering]] [[Atomic form factor|form factor]]s, <math>f_e (q,Z)</math>, from atomic [[X-ray scattering]] form factors, <math>f_x(q,Z)</math>.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Cowley|first=J. M.|date=2006|title=Electron diffraction and electron microscopy in structure determination|url=https://doi.org/10.1107/97809553602060000558|journal=International Tables for Crystallography|volume=B|pages=276–345|doi=10.1107/97809553602060000558|isbn=978-0-7923-6592-1|via=Wiley Library}}</ref><ref name=":3" /><ref>{{cite book|title=Advanced Computing in Electron Microscopy|isbn=978-1475744064|last1=Kirkland|first1=Earl J.|date=17 April 2013}}</ref> The formula was derived independently by [[Hans Bethe]] and [[Nevill Francis Mott|Neville Mott]] both in 1930,<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last1=Mott|first1=Nevill Francis|last2=Bragg|first2=William Lawrence|date=1930-06-02|title=The scattering of electrons by atoms|url=https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.1930.0082|journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character|volume=127|issue=806|pages=658–665|doi=10.1098/rspa.1930.0082|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|last=Bethe|first=H.|date=1930|title=Zur Theorie des Durchgangs schneller Korpuskularstrahlen durch Materie|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/andp.19303970303|journal=Annalen der Physik|language=en|volume=397|issue=3|pages=325–400|doi=10.1002/andp.19303970303|issn=1521-3889}}</ref> and simply follows from applying the [[Born approximation|first Born approximation]] for the scattering of electrons via the [[Coulomb interaction]] together with the [[Poisson's equation|Poisson equation]] for the charge density of an atom (including both the nucleus and electron cloud) in the Fourier domain.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /> Following the first [[Born approximation]],
 <math>f_e(q,Z)=\frac{me^2}{32\pi^3\hbar^2\epsilon_0}\Bigg(\frac{Z-f_x(q,Z)}{q^2}\Bigg) =\frac{1}{8\pi^2 a_0}\Bigg(\frac{Z-f_x(q,Z)}{q^2}\Bigg) \approx (0.2393 \textrm{nm}^{-1})\cdot \Bigg(\frac{Z-f_x(q,Z)}{q^2}\Bigg)</math>
@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 The electron scattering factor <math>f_e(q,Z)</math> has units of length, as is typical for the scattering factor, unlike the [[Atomic scattering factor|X-ray form factor]] <math>f_x(q,Z)</math> which is usually presented in dimensionless units. To perform a one-to-one comparison between the electron and X-ray form factors in the same units, the X-ray form factor should be multiplied by the square root of the [[Thomson Cross Section|Thomson cross section]] <math>\sqrt{\sigma_{T}} = r_e</math>, where <math>r_e</math> is the [[classical electron radius]], to convert it back to a unit of length.
-The Mott–Bethe formula was originally derived for free atoms, and is rigorously true provided the X-ray scattering form factor is known exactly. However, in solids, the accuracy of the Mott–Bethe formula is best for large values of <math>q</math> (<math>q>0.5</math> Å{{sup|-1}}) because the distribution of the charge density at smaller <math>q</math> (i.e. long distances) can deviate from the atomic distribution of electrons due the chemical bonds between atoms in a solid.<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal|last=Lobato|first=I.|last2=Van Dyck|first2=D.|date=2014-11-01|title=An accurate parameterization for scattering factors, electron densities and electrostatic potentials for neutral atoms that obey all physical constraints|url=http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?mq5024|journal=Acta Crystallographica Section A|language=en|volume=70|issue=6|pages=636–649|doi=10.1107/S205327331401643X|issn=2053-2733|hdl=10067/1221030151162165141|hdl-access=free}}</ref> For smaller values of <math>q</math>, <math>f_e(q,Z)</math> can be determined from tabulated values, such as those in the International Tables for Crystallography using (non)relativistic [[Hartree–Fock method|Hartee Fock]] calculations,<ref name=":0" /><ref>{{cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/highenergyelectr0000peng|title=High-Energy Electron Diffraction and Microscopy|date=2004|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=New York, NY|url-access=registration|authors=L. M. Peng, S. L. Dudarev, M. J. Whalen}}</ref> or other numerical parameterizations of the calculated charge distribution of atoms.<ref name=":3" />
+The Mott–Bethe formula was originally derived for free atoms, and is rigorously true provided the X-ray scattering form factor is known exactly. However, in solids, the accuracy of the Mott–Bethe formula is best for large values of <math>q</math> (<math>q>0.5</math> Å{{sup|-1}}) because the distribution of the charge density at smaller <math>q</math> (i.e. long distances) can deviate from the atomic distribution of electrons due the chemical bonds between atoms in a solid.<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal|last1=Lobato|first1=I.|last2=Van Dyck|first2=D.|date=2014-11-01|title=An accurate parameterization for scattering factors, electron densities and electrostatic potentials for neutral atoms that obey all physical constraints|url=http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?mq5024|journal=Acta Crystallographica Section A|language=en|volume=70|issue=6|pages=636–649|doi=10.1107/S205327331401643X|issn=2053-2733|hdl=10067/1221030151162165141|hdl-access=free}}</ref> For smaller values of <math>q</math>, <math>f_e(q,Z)</math> can be determined from tabulated values, such as those in the International Tables for Crystallography using (non)relativistic [[Hartree–Fock method|Hartee Fock]] calculations,<ref name=":0" /><ref>{{cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/highenergyelectr0000peng|title=High-Energy Electron Diffraction and Microscopy|date=2004|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=New York, NY|url-access=registration|authors=L. M. Peng, S. L. Dudarev, M. J. Whalen|isbn=9780198500742}}</ref> or other numerical parameterizations of the calculated charge distribution of atoms.<ref name=":3" />
 == References ==