Tristan and Isolde (Egusquiza): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
create
(No difference)

Revision as of 08:34, 25 December 2021

Painting of a woman lying dead on top of a man who is also dead; they are in a field surrounded by flowers, with the sea in the distance.
Tristan and Isolde (Death), 1910, 160 by 240 cm (63 by 94 in)[1]
Painting of a man and woman embracing against a backdrop of distant light.
Tristan and Isolde (Life), 1912, 227 by 162 cm (89 by 64 in)[2]

Tristan and Isolde (Spanish: Tristán e Isolda) is the title of two oil paintings by the Spanish artist Rogelio de Egusquiza. Both works are based on the opera Tristan und Isolde by the German composer Richard Wagner, who Egusquiza idolised. The first painting, subtitled Death and also known as La mort d'Isolde (The Death of Isolde), was completed in 1910 and depicts Isolde's "Liebestod", as she collapses in death upon the lifeless body of Tristan. The second painting, subtitled Life, was completed two years later and depicts the lovers embracing in the night, a scene from the second act of Wagner's opera.

The two works are part of a series of paintings by Egusquiza depicting Wagnerian subjects after he developed a fascination for Wagner's music in 1879 and subsequently met with the composer several times. He worked on various studies and etchings in the late 19th and early 20th centuries that were precursors to the paintings. Death and Life were exhibited in Paris at the Salon of the Société Nationale des Beaux-Arts in 1911 and 1912, respectively. They received mixed reviews from contemporary French critics, who disagreed on whether the paintings were able to meet the standards of their influential source material.

Background

Black-and-white portrait of Egusquiza
Egusquiza in the 1880s

Egusquiza developed a fascination with the works of Richard Wagner in 1879 after attending a performance of Wagner's Der Ring des Nibelungen.[3] His enthusiasm for what he heard led to several meetings with the composer, including a September 1880 meeting in Venice where they discussed Wagner's opera Tristan und Isolde.[4] Egusquiza frequented the annual Bayreuth Festivals in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.[5] He attended the first Bayreuth performances of Parsifal and Tristan und Isolde in 1882 and 1886 respectively, two operas that were later featured prominently in his paintings.[6]

In 1892, he took part in the first Salon de la Rose + Croix hosted by Joséphin Péladan in Paris. Egusquiza's exhibitions included a painting of Siegmund and Sieglinde from Die Walküre, and another of Amfortas from Parsifal. Though he had not yet painted Tristan or Isolde, his depiction of Siegmund and Sieglinde's embrace was the precursor to Tristan and Isolde (Life), which it closely resembles.[7] Péladan later alluded to the connection in a description of Egusquiza's Salon paintings, writing: "Ses Tristan sont d'une splendour de vertige indicible" ("His Tristans are of an inexpressibly vertiginous splendour").[8] In 1896, Egusquiza produced an etching of Tristan and Isolde (Life), changing Siegmund's animal skin clothing into Tristan's knightly attire.[9]

Egusquiza began preparing studies in chalk for the paintings in the early 1890s. He depicted Isolde as nude in the early studies and experimented with both Tristan's and Isolde's positions. An 1899 sketch of Tristan was drawn with Egusquiza's own features, and by 1901 he had established the position of the lovers' bodies in Tristan and Isolde (Death).[10][11] He exhibited his works, including etchings of Tristan and Isolde, at the salons in France. They received critical acclaim, including from Péladan who wrote that Egusquiza's depictions of Der Ring des Nibelungen and Tristan und Isolde were worthy illustrations of Wagner's music.[12][13] Egusquiza, however, was dissatisfied with the lack of colour in his own works, an opinion that was shared by his mentor, the French artist Léon Bonnat. He destroyed his early paintings and and restarted several times.[14][15] Tristan and Isolde (Death) was completed in 1910 and exhibited the following year at the Salon of the Société Nationale des Beaux-Arts, where it was presented with the title La mort d'Isolde (The Death of Isolde).[16] Tristan and Isolde (Life) was completed in 1912 and exhibited at the Salon that same year.[2][17]

Composition

Tristan and Isolde (Death) depicts the lovers during the final scene in the third act of Wagner's opera, as Isolde collapses upon Tristan's body and dies.[18]

The other figures in the scene (Mark, Brangäne, and the bodies of Kurwenal and Melot) are omitted from the painting.[20] The sea is in the background beyond the horizon, consistent with Wagner's stage directions, and surrounding Tristan and Isolde are several types of flowers—a common element in Egusquiza's works.[18]

Painting of a man bending over and clutching the hand of a woman who lies dead
João Marques de Oliveira, Cephalus and Procrus (1887)

He likely took inspiration from The Two Commanders (1866) by José Casado del Alisal for the placement of Isolde's proper right arm. The work borrows elements from Cephalus and Procris (1879) by João Marques de Oliveira, with similarities in the structure and lighting of the two paintings and common elements such as the landscape and a semi-nude, dead female figure.[21] Egusquiza likely also borrowed from another painting titled Tristan and Isolde (1887) by Jean Delville for his depiction of Isolde's body.[22]

Tristan and Isolde (Life) is based on Act II of the opera, during a scene in which Tristan and Isolde passionately reunite during the night.[6] Wagner used the night as a metaphor for a realm in which the lovers can freely express their desire for each other and for death, in contrast to the daytime when they must hide their love, stifled by honor and shame.[23] Egusquiza, who published an influential 1885 treatise in the Bayreuther Blätter on the use of lighting in Wagner's works, strove to transcribe the day/night metaphor of Tristan und Isolde in his two paintings.[9][24]

Reception

A critic for Le Gaulois praised Tristan and Isolde (Death) during its 1911 exhibition at the Salon of the Société Nationale des Beaux-Arts, describing it as a particularly striking painting within Egusquiza's depictions of Wagner's works.[25] Péladan also championed the painting in a review of the 1911 Salon:

Camille Le Senne, writing for Le Ménestrel, was more critical; though he applauded Egusquiza for the effort in producing the painting, he felt that it did not meet the standards of Wagner's music.[28]

Tristan and Isolde (Life) received similarly mixed reviews from the contemporary French press the following year. A reviewer for Le Gaulois introduced the work as a continuation of Egusquiza's Wagnerian series, writing that the artist had a profound understanding of the source material.[17] However, Le Senne criticized the painting: "Nous rentrons dans la série des sujets avec [...] le Tristan et Isolde de M. Roger de Egusquiza, dont la couleur ne vaut pas le dessin" ("We return to the series of subjects with [...] the Tristan and Isolde of Mr Roger de Egusquiza, whose colour is not worth the drawing").[29]

References

Citations

  1. ^ Jiménez 2016, p. 4.
  2. ^ a b Jiménez 2016, p. 6.
  3. ^ Barón-Nusbaum 2013, p. 77.
  4. ^ Beruete y Moret 1918, p. 17.
  5. ^ Suárez García 2013–2014, pp. 316–318, 326.
  6. ^ a b Jiménez 2016, p. 5.
  7. ^ Jiménez 2016, p. 7.
  8. ^ Kahane & Wild 1983, p. 133.
  9. ^ a b Jiménez 2016, p. 8.
  10. ^ Carmena de la Cruz 1993, p. 138.
  11. ^ Jiménez 2016, pp. 10–12.
  12. ^ Péladan 1909, p. 272.
  13. ^ Jiménez 2016, p. 9.
  14. ^ Beruete y Moret 1918, pp. 23–24.
  15. ^ Carmena de la Cruz 1993, p. 136.
  16. ^ Jiménez 2016, pp. 4–5, 16.
  17. ^ a b Le Gaulois 1912, p. 1.
  18. ^ a b Jiménez 2016, p. 13.
  19. ^ Wagner 1912, pp. 320–321.
  20. ^ Jiménez 2016, p. 12.
  21. ^ Jiménez 2016, p. 11.
  22. ^ Jiménez 2016, p. 14.
  23. ^ Chafe 2005, pp. 11, 74.
  24. ^ Barón-Nusbaum 2013, pp. 77–78.
  25. ^ Le Gaulois 1911, p. 1.
  26. ^ Péladan 1911, p. 121.
  27. ^ Jiménez 2016, p. 16.
  28. ^ Le Senne 1911, p. 137.
  29. ^ Le Senne 1912, p. 138.

Bibliography