Principle of locality: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Quantum mechanics: return EPR as the lead sentence, ref to secondary source.
→‎Quantum mechanics: cite the EPR paper, hopefully in away that makes it clear that the quote is from the review paper.
Line 27: Line 27:
{{main article|Local hidden-variable theory|Quantum nonlocality}}
{{main article|Local hidden-variable theory|Quantum nonlocality}}


In 1935, [[Albert Einstein]], [[Boris Podolsky]] and [[Nathan Rosen]] described "two spatially separated particles which have both perfectly correlated positions and momenta"<ref name=Colloquium >{{Cite journal |last=Reid |first=M. D. |last2=Drummond |first2=P. D. |last3=Bowen |first3=W. P. |last4=Cavalcanti |first4=E. G. |last5=Lam |first5=P. K. |last6=Bachor |first6=H. A. |last7=Andersen |first7=U. L. |last8=Leuchs |first8=G. |date=2009-12-10 |title=Colloquium : The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox: From concepts to applications |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1727 |journal=Reviews of Modern Physics |language=en |volume=81 |issue=4 |pages=1727–1751 |doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1727 |issn=0034-6861}}</ref> as a direct consequence of quantum theory. They intended to challenge the idea that the quantum wavefunction was a complete description of reality, but instead they sparked a debate on [[quantum nonlocality]].<ref name=Colloquium/>
In a 1935 paper,<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Einstein |first=A. |last2=Podolsky |first2=B. |last3=Rosen |first3=N. |date=1935-05-15 |title=Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.47.777 |journal=Physical Review |language=en |volume=47 |issue=10 |pages=777–780 |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.47.777 |issn=0031-899X}}</ref> [[Albert Einstein]], [[Boris Podolsky]] and [[Nathan Rosen]] described "two spatially separated particles which have both perfectly correlated positions and momenta"<ref name=Colloquium >{{Cite journal |last=Reid |first=M. D. |last2=Drummond |first2=P. D. |last3=Bowen |first3=W. P. |last4=Cavalcanti |first4=E. G. |last5=Lam |first5=P. K. |last6=Bachor |first6=H. A. |last7=Andersen |first7=U. L. |last8=Leuchs |first8=G. |date=2009-12-10 |title=Colloquium : The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox: From concepts to applications |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1727 |journal=Reviews of Modern Physics |language=en |volume=81 |issue=4 |pages=1727–1751 |doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1727 |issn=0034-6861}}</ref> as a direct consequence of quantum theory. They intended to challenge the idea that the quantum wavefunction was a complete description of reality, but instead they sparked a debate on [[quantum nonlocality]].<ref name=Colloquium/>
In 1964 [[John Stewart Bell]] formulated the "[[Bell inequality]]", which, if violated in actual experiments, implies that quantum mechanics violates '''local realism''', i.e. the intersection of locality and realism. '''Realism'''<!--boldface per WP:R#PLA; 'Realism in physics' redirects here--> refers to another principle, which relates to the value of unmeasured quantities before measurement ([[counterfactual definiteness]]).
In 1964 [[John Stewart Bell]] formulated the "[[Bell inequality]]", which, if violated in actual experiments, implies that quantum mechanics violates '''local realism''', i.e. the intersection of locality and realism. '''Realism'''<!--boldface per WP:R#PLA; 'Realism in physics' redirects here--> refers to another principle, which relates to the value of unmeasured quantities before measurement ([[counterfactual definiteness]]).



Revision as of 21:39, 4 October 2023

In physics, the principle of locality states that an object is influenced directly only by its immediate surroundings. A theory that includes the principle of locality is said to be a "local theory". This is an alternative to the concept of instantaneous, or "non-local" action at a distance. Locality evolved out of the field theories of classical physics. The idea is that for a cause at one point to have an effect at another point, something in the space between those points must mediate the action. To exert an influence, something, such as a wave or particle, must travel through the space between the two points, carrying the influence.

The special theory of relativity limits the maximum speed at which causal influence can travel to the speed of light, . Therefore, the principle of locality implies that an event at one point cannot cause a simultaneous result at another point. An event at point cannot cause a result at point in a time less than , where is the distance between the points and is the speed of light in vacuum.

Bell test experiments show that quantum mechanics broadly violates the inequalities established in Bell's theorem. According to some interpretations of quantum mechanics, this result implies that some quantum effects violate the principle of locality.

Pre-quantum mechanics

During the 17th century Newton's principle of universal gravitation was formulated in terms of "action at a distance", thereby violating the principle of locality.

It is inconceivable that inanimate Matter should, without the Mediation of something else, which is not material, operate upon, and affect other matter without mutual Contact…That Gravity should be innate, inherent and essential to Matter, so that one body may act upon another at a distance thro' a Vacuum, without the Mediation of any thing else, by and through which their Action and Force may be conveyed from one to another, is to me so great an Absurdity that I believe no Man who has in philosophical Matters a competent Faculty of thinking can ever fall into it. Gravity must be caused by an Agent acting constantly according to certain laws; but whether this Agent be material or immaterial, I have left to the Consideration of my readers.[1]

— Isaac Newton, Letters to Bentley, 1692/3

Coulomb's law of electric forces was initially also formulated as instantaneous action at a distance, but was later superseded by Maxwell's equations of electromagnetism, which obey locality.

In 1905 Albert Einstein's special theory of relativity postulated that no matter or energy can travel faster than the speed of light, and Einstein thereby sought to reformulate physics in a way that obeyed the principle of locality. He later succeeded in producing an alternative theory of gravitation, general relativity, which obeys the principle of locality.

However, a different challenge to the principle of locality developed subsequently from the theory of quantum mechanics, which Einstein himself had helped to create.

Quantum mechanics

Local realism

In a 1935 paper,[2] Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen described "two spatially separated particles which have both perfectly correlated positions and momenta"[3] as a direct consequence of quantum theory. They intended to challenge the idea that the quantum wavefunction was a complete description of reality, but instead they sparked a debate on quantum nonlocality.[3] In 1964 John Stewart Bell formulated the "Bell inequality", which, if violated in actual experiments, implies that quantum mechanics violates local realism, i.e. the intersection of locality and realism. Realism refers to another principle, which relates to the value of unmeasured quantities before measurement (counterfactual definiteness).

Experimental tests of the Bell inequality, beginning with John Clauser and Alain Aspect's 1980s experiments, showed that quantum mechanics violates the inequality, so it must violate at least one of the assumptions of local realism. However, critics have noted these experiments included "loopholes", which prevented a definitive answer to this question. This problem is considered to have been resolved during 2015 when three "loophole-free" experiments were carried out by independent groups in Delft University of Technology,[4] University of Vienna[5] and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST),[6] addressing multiple loopholes at the same time. However, some loopholes might persist, like superdeterminism, with the result that the question may be fundamentally untestable.[7]

Because of the probabilistic nature of wave function collapse, this violation of local realism cannot be used to transmit information faster than light, in accordance to the no communication theorem.

Relativistic quantum mechanics

Locality is one of the axioms of relativistic quantum field theory, as required for causality. The formalization of locality in this case is as follows: if there are two observables, each localized within two distinct spacetime regions which happen to be at a spacelike separation from each other, the observables must commute. Alternatively, a solution to the field equations is local if the underlying equations are either Lorentz invariant or, more generally, generally covariant or locally Lorentz invariant.

See also

References

  1. ^ Berkovitz, Joseph (2008). "Action at a Distance in Quantum Mechanics". In Edward N. Zalta (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter ed.).
  2. ^ Einstein, A.; Podolsky, B.; Rosen, N. (May 15, 1935). "Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?". Physical Review. 47 (10): 777–780. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.47.777. ISSN 0031-899X.
  3. ^ a b Reid, M. D.; Drummond, P. D.; Bowen, W. P.; Cavalcanti, E. G.; Lam, P. K.; Bachor, H. A.; Andersen, U. L.; Leuchs, G. (December 10, 2009). "Colloquium : The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox: From concepts to applications". Reviews of Modern Physics. 81 (4): 1727–1751. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1727. ISSN 0034-6861.
  4. ^ Hanson, Ronald (2015). "Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres". Nature. 526 (7575): 682–686. arXiv:1508.05949. Bibcode:2015Natur.526..682H. doi:10.1038/nature15759. PMID 26503041. S2CID 205246446.
  5. ^ Giustina, Marissa; Versteegh, Marijn A. M.; Wengerowsky, Soeren; Handsteiner, Johannes; Hochrainer, Armin; Phelan, Kevin; Steinlechner, Fabian; Kofler, Johannes; Larsson, Jan-Ake; Abellan, Carlos; Amaya, Waldimar; Pruneri, Valerio; Mitchell, Morgan W.; Beyer, Joern; Gerrits, Thomas; Lita, Adriana E.; Shalm, Lynden K.; Nam, Sae Woo; Scheidl, Thomas; Ursin, Rupert; Wittmann, Bernhard; Zeilinger, Anton (2015). "A significant-loophole-free test of Bell's theorem with entangled photons". Physical Review Letters. 115 (25): 250401. arXiv:1511.03190. Bibcode:2015PhRvL.115y0401G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.250401. PMID 26722905. S2CID 13789503.
  6. ^ Shalm, Lynden K.; Meyer-Scott, Evan; Christensen, Bradley G.; Bierhorst, Peter; Wayne, Michael A.; Stevens, Martin J.; Gerrits, Thomas; Glancy, Scott; Hamel, Deny R.; Allman, Michael S.; Coakley, Kevin J.; Dyer, Shellee D.; Hodge, Carson; Lita, Adriana E.; Verma, Varun B.; Lambrocco, Camilla; Tortorici, Edward; Migdall, Alan L.; Zhang, Yanbao; Kumor, Daniel R.; Farr, William H.; Marsili, Francesco; Shaw, Matthew D.; Stern, Jeffrey A.; Abellán, Carlos; Amaya, Waldimar; Pruneri, Valerio; Jennewein, Thomas; Mitchell, Morgan W.; et al. (2015). "A strong loophole-free test of local realism". Phys Rev Lett. 115 (25): 250402. arXiv:1511.03189. Bibcode:2015PhRvL.115y0402S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.250402. PMC 5815856. PMID 26722906.
  7. ^ Holmes, Rebecca (2017). "Local realism is dead, long live local realism?". Physics World. 30 (6): 21–25. Bibcode:2017PhyW...30f..21H. doi:10.1088/2058-7058/30/6/41.

External links