Heat and moisture exchanger: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
that is described over there, not here
complete citation, this is a review
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Heat and Moisture Exchanger.jpg|thumb|Heat and Moisture Exchanger (HME)]]
[[File:Heat and Moisture Exchanger.jpg|thumb|Heat and Moisture Exchanger (HME)]]


'''Heat and exchange moisturizers''' (HME) have been in clinical use for over 30 years.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Zuur|first=JK|coauthors=Muller SH, de Jongh FH, van Zandwijk N, Hilgers FJ|title=The physiological rationale of heat and moisture exchangers in post-laryngectomy pulmonary rehabilitation: a review.|journal=Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol|year=2006|volume=263|issue=1|pages=1-8}}</ref>
'''Heat and exchange moisturizers''' (HME) have been in clinical use for over 30 years.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Zuur JK, Muller SH, de Jongh FH, van Zandwijk N, Hilgers FJ |title=The physiological rationale of heat and moisture exchangers in post-laryngectomy pulmonary rehabilitation: a review |journal=Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol |volume=263 |issue=1 |pages=1–8 |year=2006 |month=January |pmid=16001247 |doi=10.1007/s00405-005-0969-3}}</ref>


An HME cassette plays a central part of lung rehabilitation after a total [[laryngectomy]].{{cn}}
An HME cassette plays a central part of lung rehabilitation after a total [[laryngectomy]].{{cn}}

Revision as of 16:26, 22 March 2012

Heat and Moisture Exchanger (HME)

Heat and exchange moisturizers (HME) have been in clinical use for over 30 years.[1]

An HME cassette plays a central part of lung rehabilitation after a total laryngectomy.[citation needed]

Function

An HME has three physical properties:

  1. heat and moisture exchanging capacity,
  2. resistance, and
  3. filtering particles.

Heat and moisture exchanging capacity

In the lungs a temperature of 37°C and 100% RH is the ideal condition for the ciliary activity. If the conditions differ i.e. too warm (fever) or too cold the cilia beat slower and at some point not at all. During normal nasal inspiration, air of 22°C and 40% Relative Humidity (RH) is conditioned into air of 32°C and 99% RH at the level of the trachea.[2] In a clinical study[3] these numbers for laryngectomized persons were examined without and with the use of an HME cassette. Without an HME cassette the numbers for the inhaled air were much lower for laryngectomized patients - air of 22°C and 40% RH was only conditioned to 27-28°C and 50% RH at the level of the upper trachea. The lower temperature and minor humidity have an impact on the ciliary activity in the trachea, which is significantly restricted if the RH drops. But the tracheal climate rapidly changed after application and removal of an HME by increase of the temperature and improvement of the RH.

Resistance

The effect of the increased resistance (compared to stoma breathing without HME) in laryngectomees is still poorly understood, but it is clear that HMEs add a variable resistance to the airflow resistance, depending on the flow rate, though the outcomes of studies are not consistent.[4][5] Although the breathing resistance of the HME contributes to a more ‘normal’ breathing situation, it should not be too high. Patients would not tolerate a breathing resistance like the normal upper airways because they do not have the possibility to breathe in through their mouth like non-laryngectomized people do when the breathing resistance of the nose is too high (for example when running).

Filtering particles

There are special HME cassettes with an electrostatic filter to enhance the protection against airborne microbes to help to reduce the transfer of viruses and bacteria. This is especially important since laryngectomees often have a compromised immune system. Wearing an HME cassette does not compensate for the loss of upper airway filtration of smaller particles such as bacteria and viruses; the pores of the HME filter are larger than the diameter of the infectious particles. Only larger particles are filtered by the HME. In a clinical study it is concluded that the use of HMEs does not endanger the exposure to infectious microorganisms.[6]

Pulmonary function rehabilitation

With the regular use of an HME cassette over a couple of weeks, the pulmonary functions can be significantly improved in the majority of patients regarding reduced sputum production, reduced forced expectoration in order to clear the airways, and thereby reduced stoma cleaning.[7] This is due to improved ventilation and blood oxygenation values, which leads to a better ciliary activity and thus more efficient coughing for mucus clearance from the trachea. Diverse studies, e.g. from Spain[8] and the US[9] show that with regular and enduring use of an HME cassette, pulmonary complaints decrease, regardless of country and climate. These improvements can even have an impact on voice quality regarding pitch, loudness and intelligibility. Apart from that it can have a positive impact on sleeping disorders and fatigue, which is often related to pulmonary problems.

Properties

Material

The basic component of a heat and moisture exchanger is foam, paper, or another substance, which acts as a condensation and absorption surface. The material is often impregnated with hygroscopic salts such as Calcium Chloride, in order to enhance the water-retaining capacity. The HMEs used for laryngectomees are mostly hygroscopic, that refers to the ability to attract and hold water and might have been impregnated with a bactericide solution in order to control bacterial colonization.

Size

HMEs can vary in size but they are designed to fit all adhesives or other attachment devices within a certain product line. There exist even HME cassettes for tracheostomy patients, those can vary in size and are usually a bit larger.

Design

Air openings are at the side or at the front of the HME. It is important that it cannot be accidentally covered by clothes or sheets. Some designs use crossbars to prevent clothing from blocking. Usually a rim on the lid helps to find the correct finger position for occlusion.

Hands-free

A hands-free HME enables laryngectomees to speak without requiring finger occlusion. The device consists of a combination of HME and an automatic speaking valve, which closes automatically, when exhaling air for speaking, enabling the pulmonary air to be diverted through the voice prosthesis into the esophagus. It reopens automatically, when exhalation decreases. Beside that the hands-free HME enables easy removal in case of coughing, or even an adjustable cough relief valve, to release the air that is build up during coughing. In some devices, speech membranes in different strengths can accommodate different speaking pressures.

Even though the hands-free device offers a convenient method for speaking without using ones hands, the overall speech quality was reported to be slightly impaired compared to a regular HME,[10] due to the fact that more air pressure is required to close the valve. Another problem can occur with the seal of the base plate that is used to attach the HME.

Special devices

For physical exercise

There are special HME devices which have a lower airflow resistance, this makes them suitable for example during physical exercise or when adapting to the breathing resistance for patients that have not used any stoma protection before and start using an HME or have not used an HME for a longer time.

With antimicrobial filter

During normal nasal breathing, the inhaled air is also filtered to a certain extend. This filtration is important because the spread of viral and bacterial disease by way of the atmosphere requires, among other things, that infectious particles be inhaled by susceptible individuals and deposited at effective sites within the respiratory system for the initiation of disease.[11] An HME is not considered to be an efficient barrier for microorganisms due to a relatively poor bacterial filtration capacity of simple hygroscopic HMEs. There are special HMEs provided with an electrostatic filter, to provide some protection from small particles and airborne microorganisms. These HMEs can be compared to when individuals who breathe through their mouth are wearing an inhalation protection with an electrostatic filter.

Attachment of the device

HME devices can be attached to the tracheostoma in two different ways: peristomally, by use of a base plate, to which the HME can be attached, and intraluminally, by putting the HME into a laryngectomy tube or a stoma button. Adhesive baseplates come in different shapes and properties to meet the users’ differences in anatomy and skin types.

Peristomally through an adhesive on the neck surrounding the stoma

There is a variety of adhesive baseplates, that can be used to attach the HME and products that are recommended for proper application and removal of the adhesive complement the portfolio.

Intraluminally through a device that is inserted into the tracheostoma

Some laryngectomized patients require a laryngectomy tube to maintain stoma patency, especially in the early postsurgical days and during postoperative radiotherapy.[12] Laryngectomy tubes are available in different models, e.g. the Provox LaryTube is designed in a way that it can even hold a Provox HME. A stoma button however is primarily used in stomas that are shrinking. This is the preferred solution for many users, but there has to be a tight ‘lip’ or ‘rim’ that holds the button in place.

Device lifetime

The majority of patients use one adhesive per day and 1-2 HME cassettes per day.

Voice prosthesis

An individual combination of voice prosthesis, HME (Heat and Moisture Exchanger) and attachment is important for good speech and pulmonary rehabilitation.

References

  1. ^ Zuur JK, Muller SH, de Jongh FH, van Zandwijk N, Hilgers FJ (2006). "The physiological rationale of heat and moisture exchangers in post-laryngectomy pulmonary rehabilitation: a review". Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 263 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1007/s00405-005-0969-3. PMID 16001247. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  2. ^ Ingelstedt, S (1956). "Studies on the conditioning of air in the respiratory tract". Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 131: 1–80.
  3. ^ Keck, T (2005). "Tracheal climate in laryngectomees after use of a heat and moisture exchanger". Laryngoscope. 115 (3): 534–537. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  4. ^ Grolman, W (1997). "An efficiency comparison of four heat and moisture exchangers used in the laryngectomized patient". Laryngoscope. 107 (6): 814–820. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  5. ^ Verkerke, GJ (2002). "Airflow resistance of heat and moisture exchange filters with and without a tracheostoma valve". Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 111 (4): 333–337. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  6. ^ Kramp, B (2009). "Prospective controlled study of microbial colonization of the trachea in tracheotomized and laryngectomized patients with HME (heat and moisture exchanger)". Acta Otolaryngol. 129 (10): 1136–1144. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  7. ^ Hilgers, FJ (1991). "The influence of a heat and moisture exchanger (HME) on the respiratory symptoms after total laryngectomy". Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 16 (2): 152–156. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  8. ^ Herranz Gonzalez-Botas, J (2001). "Experience with the HME-Provox Stomafilter in laryngectomized patients". Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 52 (3): 221–225. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  9. ^ Ackerstaff, AH (2003). "Multicenter study assessing effects of heat and moisture exchanger use on respiratory symptoms and voice quality in laryngectomized individuals". Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 129 (6): 705–712. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  10. ^ Op de Coul, BM (2005). "Compliance, quality of life and quantitative voice quality aspects of hands-free speech". Acta Otolaryngol. 125 (6): 629–637. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  11. ^ Hatch, TF (1961). "Distribution and deposition of inhaled particles in respiratory tract". Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 25 (3): 237–240.
  12. ^ Ward, EC (2007). "11". Head and Neck Cancer: Treatment, Rehabilitation, and Outcomes. San Diego: Plural Publishing. pp. 289–311. {{cite book}}: More than one of |author= and |last= specified (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

Further reading